Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion Exposure community?

"Mayutan A." <mayutan.arumaithurai@gmail.com> Sat, 05 September 2009 05:46 UTC

Return-Path: <mayutan.arumaithurai@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: re-ecn@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: re-ecn@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F1E33A6909 for <re-ecn@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Sep 2009 22:46:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4nRafrhEPArp for <re-ecn@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Sep 2009 22:46:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yx0-f190.google.com (mail-yx0-f190.google.com [209.85.210.190]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A5813A68FB for <re-ecn@ietf.org>; Fri, 4 Sep 2009 22:46:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by yxe28 with SMTP id 28so1566060yxe.19 for <re-ecn@ietf.org>; Fri, 04 Sep 2009 22:46:16 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=44yKrHM7kBScogbq4fYm+jO5anMvaIDA/gvx4UbIsxE=; b=qzkAuGornO8/HPsOuGbbnZ4aVG7OiTHp4iFOvcdh4hu/LHaJfYD1cxdJUTyRwCILnK EgyX1cT+Xitl6QPKO5BF9sFKQL1orkHsjpksIBqATe5zWQWKZL0iYt0Ruva1TPrhv0cj nph44UoEWp6cSl9tmjOEjDWQXbOJ9PC1l6SgU=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=VmjEL6OG8t+wA+qRIazdwt+Z4pMYMOOzOSQhtGyh5/hcQU9aFZgAl/7A72Z4BPjv0O cJWi7XQFl5arKh8r1wEsdoMdzAZVgviJrqgWUC1nxAPC7KkfZsKYwud3pjvCwMrQPFC5 wiXngP3IG+zDHjtmk9ogmtb6/LfSVn07X+DQs=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.151.28.10 with SMTP id f10mr19859459ybj.121.1252129576326; Fri, 04 Sep 2009 22:46:16 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <200909021633.n82GXbsp012052@bagheera.jungle.bt.co.uk>
References: <200909021633.n82GXbsp012052@bagheera.jungle.bt.co.uk>
Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2009 07:46:16 +0200
Message-ID: <f18355b80909042246x33c655cp2e71078bea925d6e@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Mayutan A." <mayutan.arumaithurai@gmail.com>
To: Bob Briscoe <rbriscoe@jungle.bt.co.uk>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd5c6da9c18aa0472ce2263
Cc: re-ecn@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion Exposure community?
X-BeenThere: re-ecn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: re-inserted explicit congestion notification <re-ecn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/re-ecn>, <mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/re-ecn>
List-Post: <mailto:re-ecn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/re-ecn>, <mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Sep 2009 05:46:39 -0000

Hi,

I have been following the re-ECN development for a long time and would be
very interested in playing an active role.  I am willing to help in various
activities such as implementation, simulation, promoting a re-ECN flavour,
co-authoring documents etc.

Cheers,
Mayutan

On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 6:33 PM, Bob Briscoe <rbriscoe@jungle.bt.co.uk>wrote;wrote:

> Folks,
>
> I'd like to try to arrange a Congestion Exposure (re-ECN) BoF in Nov at the
> Hiroshima IETF. If so, we have to notify the area directors v soon - by
> 24:00 UTC Mon 7 Sep 09. #1 gating function for Area Directors: activity on
> an ietf list.
>
> Therefore, pls respond preferably *on this list* if you're interested in
> being involved, no matter how insignificantly, e.g.
>
> - you want congestion visibility for other stuff you're doing
>  (but don't intend to work on it itself)
> - reviewing docs,
> - alternative way to achieve congestion exposure
> - participate in mailing list discussion,
> - co-authoring docs
> - design ways to do incremental deployment
> - using code for other stuff you're doing
> - thinking up new uses for the protocol
> - breaking it
> - analysing benefits/costs
> - implement protocol
> - implement a demo
> - running or participating in trials
> - standing on the sidelines booing or clapping
> - whatever
>
> Perceived problem:
> Most people want to work on something finite like a new cool
> non-TCP-friendly congestion control. Less people want to go into an
> pseudo-infinite loop fixing IP to allow other cool stuff to happen. If you
> want something like re-ECN to be there, but don't have the bandwidth to work
> on it, that's cool too - please say this - it's still palpable support. And
> you will be likely to have review comments related to how you want to use
> it.
>
> Cheers
>
>
> Bob
>
>
> ________________________________________________________________
> Bob Briscoe,               Networks Research Centre, BT Research
> _______________________________________________
> re-ECN mailing list
> re-ECN@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/re-ecn
>



-- 
Mayutan Arumaithurai
0049-551-2712647 (Home number)
0049-176-20322049 (mobile number)