[re-ECN] Talk on re-ECN in intarea

Bob Briscoe <rbriscoe@jungle.bt.co.uk> Thu, 23 July 2009 14:59 UTC

Return-Path: <rbriscoe@jungle.bt.co.uk>
X-Original-To: re-ecn@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: re-ecn@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A31AF3A6B17 for <re-ecn@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 07:59:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.779
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.779 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.338, BAYES_00=-2.599, DNS_FROM_RFC_BOGUSMX=1.482, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hn6MbfMpXhau for <re-ecn@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 07:59:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp3.smtp.bt.com (smtp3.smtp.bt.com [217.32.164.138]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2D4E3A6B48 for <re-ecn@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 07:59:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from i2kc08-ukbr.domain1.systemhost.net ([193.113.197.71]) by smtp3.smtp.bt.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Thu, 23 Jul 2009 15:58:09 +0100
Received: from cbibipnt08.iuser.iroot.adidom.com ([147.149.100.81]) by i2kc08-ukbr.domain1.systemhost.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Thu, 23 Jul 2009 15:58:09 +0100
Received: From bagheera.jungle.bt.co.uk ([132.146.168.158]) by cbibipnt08.iuser.iroot.adidom.com (WebShield SMTP v4.5 MR1a P0803.399); id 1248361088781; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 15:58:08 +0100
Received: from mut.jungle.bt.co.uk ([10.73.130.61]) by bagheera.jungle.bt.co.uk (8.13.5/8.12.8) with ESMTP id n6NEw5nA006553 for <re-ecn@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 15:58:05 +0100
Message-Id: <200907231458.n6NEw5nA006553@bagheera.jungle.bt.co.uk>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2009 15:58:00 +0100
To: re-ECN unIETF list <re-ecn@ietf.org>
From: Bob Briscoe <rbriscoe@jungle.bt.co.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.56 on 132.146.168.158
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 23 Jul 2009 14:58:09.0601 (UTC) FILETIME=[FE370B10:01CA0BA5]
Subject: [re-ECN] Talk on re-ECN in intarea
X-BeenThere: re-ecn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: re-inserted explicit congestion notification <re-ecn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/re-ecn>, <mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/re-ecn>
List-Post: <mailto:re-ecn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/re-ecn>, <mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2009 14:59:36 -0000

re-ECN list,

I said the ad hoc BoF (below) isn't intended to be a general 
show-and-tell. I should have mentioned that those who want a status 
update on re-ECN (and my latest attempt to explain it briefly) might 
be interested in an overview talk I'm giving about re-ECN in the 
Internet Area Open Meeting on Wed in Stockholm.
<http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/75/agenda/intarea.txt>

                     Internet Area WG Agenda - IETF 75
                         1510-1610 2009-07-29 (Wed)
/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
Internet Capacity Sharing for packets not flows Briscoe          30 minutes
   <http://www.cs.ucl.ac.uk/staff/B.Briscoe/projects/refb/#fairfastWP>
/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\

I will give a brief status update in the Bar BoF too, of course.

Bob

>Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2009 19:00:39 +0100
>To: re-ECN unIETF list <re-ecn@ietf.org>
>From: Bob Briscoe <rbriscoe@jungle.bt.co.uk>
>Subject: Congestion Transparency (re-ECN) ad hoc BoF @Stockholm IETF
>
>Folks,
>
>I'd like to get together people who might be interested in helping 
>organise a BoF on Congestion Transparency (re-ECN) for a future IETF.
>
>15:00 - 16:30 CET Thu 30 Jul Rm 501 @ Stockholm IETF conference venue
>
>This isn't intended to be a general show-and-tell - it's mainly for 
>people interested in helping/reviewing/discussing plans for a BoF to 
>form an IETF working group.





________________________________________________________________
Bob Briscoe,               Networks Research Centre, BT Research