Re: [re-ECN] implementations
<alan.p.smith@bt.com> Fri, 16 October 2009 09:01 UTC
Return-Path: <alan.p.smith@bt.com>
X-Original-To: re-ecn@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: re-ecn@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id 388313A6822 for <re-ecn@core3.amsl.com>;
Fri, 16 Oct 2009 02:01:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Q5rtBNfY21nW for
<re-ecn@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 16 Oct 2009 02:01:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp2.smtp.bt.com (smtp2.smtp.bt.com [217.32.164.150]) by
core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3956B3A67D2 for <re-ecn@ietf.org>;
Fri, 16 Oct 2009 02:01:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from E03MVB1-UKBR.domain1.systemhost.net ([193.113.197.110]) by
smtp2.smtp.bt.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959);
Fri, 16 Oct 2009 10:01:45 +0100
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2009 10:00:28 +0100
Message-ID: <C9BB98B434D19544A9D39022083A558E0515DFE3@E03MVB1-UKBR.domain1.systemhost.net>
In-Reply-To: <4AD7A078.8000100@thinkingcat.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [re-ECN] implementations
thread-index: AcpN5e6oT3uv3JP5RTejmkl/42RRwwAVFXXA
From: <alan.p.smith@bt.com>
To: <re-ecn@ietf.org>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 16 Oct 2009 09:01:45.0951 (UTC)
FILETIME=[49ADBEF0:01CA4E3F]
Subject: Re: [re-ECN] implementations
X-BeenThere: re-ecn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: re-inserted explicit congestion notification <re-ecn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/re-ecn>,
<mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/re-ecn>
List-Post: <mailto:re-ecn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/re-ecn>,
<mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2009 09:01:44 -0000
BT has produced an implementation on Linux. It has specifically been built on kernel version 2.6.27.7, but would work on any version where the patched files are not altered from this version. It has a simplified version of byte accounting i.e it attempts to forward mark packets to an equivalent number of bytes to those that have been congestion marked. It does this by keeping a record of the largest segment transmitted and assuming that feedback of a congestion mark relates to the largest packet transmitted so far. This is a conservative approach, ensuring that the implementation does not under report expected congestion. Re-ECN interworking with ECN (Re-ECN co-mode) has also been implemented. Availability is via email to me. Alan -----Original Message----- From: re-ecn-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:re-ecn-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Leslie Daigle Sent: 15 October 2009 23:22 To: re-ecn@ietf.org Subject: [re-ECN] implementations Hi, Following up an off-list suggestion -- we've heard passing references to re-ecn implementations, but it would probably be good to be able to be a bit more authoritative. If you've done such implementation work -- I'm happy to collect references here and at least have a slide up in Hiroshima to list them/provide further pointers for people. Thanks, Leslie. -- ------------------------------------------------------------------- "Reality: Yours to discover." -- ThinkingCat Leslie Daigle leslie@thinkingcat.com ------------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ re-ECN mailing list re-ECN@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/re-ecn
- [re-ECN] implementations Leslie Daigle
- Re: [re-ECN] implementations toby.moncaster
- Re: [re-ECN] implementations alan.p.smith
- Re: [re-ECN] implementations Mirja Kühlewind
- Re: [re-ECN] implementations Don Bowman
- Re: [re-ECN] implementations Matt Mathis
- Re: [re-ECN] implementations Don Bowman
- Re: [re-ECN] implementations Bob Briscoe
- Re: [re-ECN] implementations Don Bowman
- Re: [re-ECN] implementations Bob Briscoe
- [re-ECN] What do we mean by "Congestion" John Leslie
- Re: [re-ECN] What do we mean by "Congestion" Don Bowman
- Re: [re-ECN] implementations Don Bowman
- Re: [re-ECN] What do we mean by "Congestion" Bob Briscoe