Re: [re-ECN] Congestion Transparency (re-ECN) ad hoc BoF @Stockholm IETF

Michael Menth <menth@informatik.uni-wuerzburg.de> Wed, 22 July 2009 22:24 UTC

Return-Path: <menth@informatik.uni-wuerzburg.de>
X-Original-To: re-ecn@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: re-ecn@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 493FC3A67F3 for <re-ecn@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Jul 2009 15:24:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.379
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.379 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, SARE_MLH_Stock1=0.87]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IDttUvetEIiQ for <re-ecn@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Jul 2009 15:24:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailrelay.rz.uni-wuerzburg.de (mailrelay.rz.uni-wuerzburg.de [132.187.3.28]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1791C3A69FB for <re-ecn@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Jul 2009 15:23:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from virusscan.mail (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailrelay.mail (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C6D7A093C; Wed, 22 Jul 2009 23:09:12 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by virusscan.mail (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E87AA093A; Wed, 22 Jul 2009 23:09:12 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [192.168.1.2] (g228028068.adsl.alicedsl.de [92.228.28.68]) by mailmaster.uni-wuerzburg.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC7C5199290; Wed, 22 Jul 2009 23:09:11 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <4A677FF6.6030405@informatik.uni-wuerzburg.de>
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2009 23:09:10 +0200
From: Michael Menth <menth@informatik.uni-wuerzburg.de>
Organization: University of Wuerzburg
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (Windows/20090605)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Bob Briscoe <rbriscoe@jungle.bt.co.uk>
References: <200907221800.n6MI0s9a006678@bagheera.jungle.bt.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <200907221800.n6MI0s9a006678@bagheera.jungle.bt.co.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at uni-wuerzburg.de
Cc: re-ECN unIETF list <re-ecn@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [re-ECN] Congestion Transparency (re-ECN) ad hoc BoF @Stockholm IETF
X-BeenThere: re-ecn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: menth@informatik.uni-wuerzburg.de
List-Id: re-inserted explicit congestion notification <re-ecn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/re-ecn>, <mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/re-ecn>
List-Post: <mailto:re-ecn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/re-ecn>, <mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2009 22:24:28 -0000

Hi Bob,

just to give you some feedback: I'll be there.

Michael

Bob Briscoe schrieb:
> Folks,
>
> I'd like to get together people who might be interested in helping 
> organise a BoF on Congestion Transparency (re-ECN) for a future IETF.
>
> 15:00 - 16:30 CET Thu 30 Jul Rm 501 @ Stockholm IETF conference venue
>
> Pls give ideas for agenda items (I will too).
>
> This isn't intended to be a general show-and-tell - it's mainly for 
> people interested in helping/reviewing/discussing plans for a BoF to 
> form an IETF working group. This should complement the design team 
> work going on in ICCRG on a new capacity sharing architecture for the 
> Internet. 
> <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/irtf/trac/wiki/CapacitySharingArch>
>
> For those who won't be able to attend (and those who will), this list 
> would also be a fine place to start discussions.
>
> The main idea is to get some protocol specification activity going 
> around re-ECN. Probably initially experimental track. So we can make 
> some practical progress. But there is also room for writing docs about 
> uses of congestion transparency and so on.
>
> My colleague Alan Smith has (finally) got the green light from our 
> employers to open source the Linux kernel code he has written. And 
> there are two implementations in ns2 that I know of, with another two 
> being planned. So we ought to be making sure the spec becomes truly 
> common property and starts to evolve to commonly agreed requirements.
>
> That means we have to be open to any changes, including using 
> better/different fields in protocol headers, choosing a different 
> name, and so on. But the most important thing is to make some 
> practical progress.
>
>
>
> Bob
>
>
> ________________________________________________________________
> Bob Briscoe,               Networks Research Centre, BT Research
> _______________________________________________
> re-ECN mailing list
> re-ECN@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/re-ecn

-- 
Dr. Michael Menth, Assistant Professor
University of Wuerzburg, Institute of Computer Science
Am Hubland, D-97074 Wuerzburg, Germany, room B206
phone: (+49)-931/31-86644 (new), fax: (+49)-931/888-6632
mailto:menth@informatik.uni-wuerzburg.de
http://www3.informatik.uni-wuerzburg.de/research/ngn