Re: [re-ECN] Fwd: Pls bash: Congestion Exposure (re-ECN) BoF inHiroshima?

<toby.moncaster@bt.com> Fri, 04 September 2009 16:39 UTC

Return-Path: <toby.moncaster@bt.com>
X-Original-To: re-ecn@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: re-ecn@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC6DC3A68BB for <re-ecn@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Sep 2009 09:39:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.241
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.241 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.358, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bHMOM-3XZqhe for <re-ecn@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Sep 2009 09:39:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp2.smtp.bt.com (smtp2.smtp.bt.com [217.32.164.150]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65CCD3A69B7 for <re-ecn@ietf.org>; Fri, 4 Sep 2009 09:39:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from E03MVZ1-UKDY.domain1.systemhost.net ([193.113.30.61]) by smtp2.smtp.bt.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Fri, 4 Sep 2009 17:39:51 +0100
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 17:39:50 +0100
Message-ID: <AEDCAF87EEC94F49BA92EBDD49854CC70CEB7E0C@E03MVZ1-UKDY.domain1.systemhost.net>
In-Reply-To: <200909041536.n84Fah0G028653@bagheera.jungle.bt.co.uk>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [re-ECN] Fwd: Pls bash: Congestion Exposure (re-ECN) BoF inHiroshima?
Thread-Index: AcotdZ5aN60talcdS6CmaWq02kbwTQACKoIQ
References: <200909041536.n84Fah0G028653@bagheera.jungle.bt.co.uk>
From: <toby.moncaster@bt.com>
To: <rbriscoe@jungle.bt.co.uk>, <re-ecn@ietf.org>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 04 Sep 2009 16:39:51.0938 (UTC) FILETIME=[53410620:01CA2D7E]
Subject: Re: [re-ECN] Fwd: Pls bash: Congestion Exposure (re-ECN) BoF inHiroshima?
X-BeenThere: re-ecn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: re-inserted explicit congestion notification <re-ecn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/re-ecn>, <mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/re-ecn>
List-Post: <mailto:re-ecn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/re-ecn>, <mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2009 16:39:48 -0000

I'm happy to review it...

> -----Original Message-----
> From: re-ecn-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:re-ecn-bounces@ietf.org] On
> Behalf Of Bob Briscoe
> Sent: 04 September 2009 16:37
> To: re-ECN unIETF list
> Subject: [re-ECN] Fwd: Pls bash: Congestion Exposure (re-ECN) BoF
> inHiroshima?
> 
> Folks,
> 
> Does anyone want to help co-author the BoF proposal (by Monday night)?
> Or specifically commit to review it?
> 
> 
> Bob
> 
> 
> >Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2009 17:32:25 +0100
> >To: re-ecn@ietf.org
> >From: Bob Briscoe <rbriscoe@jungle.bt.co.uk>
> >Subject: Pls bash: Congestion Exposure (re-ECN) BoF in Hiroshima?
> >
> >Hi Folks,
> >
> >I'd like to try to arrange a Congestion Exposure (re-ECN) BoF in Nov
> >at the Hiroshima IETF. Pls bash the following proposals.
> >
> >A/ Basic idea: Expose Congestion at network layer, so operators can
> >encourage endpoint behaviours that minimise congestion while
> >maximising performance (e.g. LEDBAT).
> >
> >B/ Which Area?
> >I suggest we should notify Int Area & Transport Area, but I imagine
> >Transport Area would own this.
> >
> >C/ Community (see separate mail)
> >
> >D/ Ultimate documents to deliver (draft charter milestones):...?
> >1. (INF) Motivating cases for congestion exposure
> >2. (EXP) protocol spec (re-ECN is one proposal)
> >    - choosing an encoding in IP, plus alternative encodings in an
> appendix
> >3. <if the encoding uses bit 48 in IPv4>
> >    (STD) Reassign value 1 of bit 48 from 'reserved' to 'experimental
> use'
> >    Also describe conditions on experiments, e.g.:
> >    - confined in space and in time
> >    - multiple simultaneous experiments with same value would need v
> > strong case
> >4. (INF) Report(s) on experimental uses of protocols
> >
> >E/ Supporting text to work on
> >- BoF Description     (by 07 Sep 09 BoF deadline - Monday!!)
> >- Proposed BoF Agenda (by 28 Oct 09 WG agendas deadline)
> >- Problem statement   (by 19 Oct 09 I-D deadline)
> >- Protocol proposal(s) (by 19 Oct 09 I-D deadline)
> >- have I missed anything?
> >
> >F/ Other requirements
> >- What's the "elevator pitch"?
> >- Demo? Of what? The protocol, or a use of the protocol? What use?
> >- BoF Chairs x2 (Rich Woundy has volunteered)
> >
> >_____
> >Minutes of Stockholm Bar BoF where we discussed this, and links to
> >supporting docs so far:
> ><http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/tsv/trac/wiki/re-ECN>
> >
> >
> >
> >Bob
> >
> >________________________________________________________________
> >Bob Briscoe,               Networks Research Centre, BT Research
> 
> ________________________________________________________________
> Bob Briscoe,               Networks Research Centre, BT Research
> 
> _______________________________________________
> re-ECN mailing list
> re-ECN@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/re-ecn