Re: [re-ECN] Fwd: Pls bash: Congestion Exposure (re-ECN) BoF in Hiroshima?

marcelo bagnulo braun <marcelo@it.uc3m.es> Fri, 04 September 2009 18:07 UTC

Return-Path: <marcelo@it.uc3m.es>
X-Original-To: re-ecn@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: re-ecn@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CB983A66B4 for <re-ecn@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Sep 2009 11:07:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.52
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.52 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.079, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LK-c9i4m+gC6 for <re-ecn@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Sep 2009 11:07:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp03.uc3m.es (smtp03.uc3m.es [163.117.176.133]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BADE3A6358 for <re-ecn@ietf.org>; Fri, 4 Sep 2009 11:07:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from marcelo-bagnulos-macbook-pro.local (206.pool85-53-144.dynamic.orange.es [85.53.144.206]) by smtp03.uc3m.es (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03B897F2160; Fri, 4 Sep 2009 19:45:56 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <4AA15254.2040509@it.uc3m.es>
Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2009 19:45:56 +0200
From: marcelo bagnulo braun <marcelo@it.uc3m.es>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Macintosh/20090812)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Bob Briscoe <rbriscoe@jungle.bt.co.uk>
References: <200909041536.n84Fah0G028653@bagheera.jungle.bt.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <200909041536.n84Fah0G028653@bagheera.jungle.bt.co.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSS-7.0.0.3116-5.6.0.1016-16868.000
Cc: re-ECN unIETF list <re-ecn@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [re-ECN] Fwd: Pls bash: Congestion Exposure (re-ECN) BoF in Hiroshima?
X-BeenThere: re-ecn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: re-inserted explicit congestion notification <re-ecn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/re-ecn>, <mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/re-ecn>
List-Post: <mailto:re-ecn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/re-ecn>, <mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2009 18:07:16 -0000

I can review it.
regards, marcelo


Bob Briscoe escribió:
> Folks,
>
> Does anyone want to help co-author the BoF proposal (by Monday night)?
> Or specifically commit to review it?
>
>
> Bob
>
>
>> Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2009 17:32:25 +0100
>> To: re-ecn@ietf.org
>> From: Bob Briscoe <rbriscoe@jungle.bt.co.uk>
>> Subject: Pls bash: Congestion Exposure (re-ECN) BoF in Hiroshima?
>>
>> Hi Folks,
>>
>> I'd like to try to arrange a Congestion Exposure (re-ECN) BoF in Nov 
>> at the Hiroshima IETF. Pls bash the following proposals.
>>
>> A/ Basic idea: Expose Congestion at network layer, so operators can 
>> encourage endpoint behaviours that minimise congestion while 
>> maximising performance (e.g. LEDBAT).
>>
>> B/ Which Area?
>> I suggest we should notify Int Area & Transport Area, but I imagine 
>> Transport Area would own this.
>>
>> C/ Community (see separate mail)
>>
>> D/ Ultimate documents to deliver (draft charter milestones):...?
>> 1. (INF) Motivating cases for congestion exposure
>> 2. (EXP) protocol spec (re-ECN is one proposal)
>>    - choosing an encoding in IP, plus alternative encodings in an 
>> appendix
>> 3. <if the encoding uses bit 48 in IPv4>
>>    (STD) Reassign value 1 of bit 48 from 'reserved' to 'experimental 
>> use'
>>    Also describe conditions on experiments, e.g.:
>>    - confined in space and in time
>>    - multiple simultaneous experiments with same value would need v 
>> strong case
>> 4. (INF) Report(s) on experimental uses of protocols
>>
>> E/ Supporting text to work on
>> - BoF Description     (by 07 Sep 09 BoF deadline - Monday!!)
>> - Proposed BoF Agenda (by 28 Oct 09 WG agendas deadline)
>> - Problem statement   (by 19 Oct 09 I-D deadline)
>> - Protocol proposal(s) (by 19 Oct 09 I-D deadline)
>> - have I missed anything?
>>
>> F/ Other requirements
>> - What's the "elevator pitch"?
>> - Demo? Of what? The protocol, or a use of the protocol? What use?
>> - BoF Chairs x2 (Rich Woundy has volunteered)
>>
>> _____
>> Minutes of Stockholm Bar BoF where we discussed this, and links to 
>> supporting docs so far:
>> <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/tsv/trac/wiki/re-ECN>
>>
>>
>>
>> Bob
>>
>> ________________________________________________________________
>> Bob Briscoe,               Networks Research Centre, BT Research
>
> ________________________________________________________________
> Bob Briscoe,               Networks Research Centre, BT Research
> _______________________________________________
> re-ECN mailing list
> re-ECN@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/re-ecn
>