[re-ECN] Trend report
Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com> Tue, 29 September 2009 14:09 UTC
Return-Path: <fred@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: re-ecn@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: re-ecn@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id 75DC13A6AC6 for <re-ecn@core3.amsl.com>;
Tue, 29 Sep 2009 07:09:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.179
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.179 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.420,
BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 37m81vNQxApm for
<re-ecn@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Sep 2009 07:09:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sj-iport-1.cisco.com (sj-iport-1.cisco.com [171.71.176.70]) by
core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF1A23A6AAF for <re-ecn@ietf.org>;
Tue, 29 Sep 2009 07:09:41 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com;
i=fred@cisco.com; l=585; q=dns/txt; s=sjiport01001; t=1254233462; x=1255443062;
h=from:sender:reply-to:subject:date:message-id:to:cc: mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-id:
content-description:resent-date:resent-from:resent-sender:
resent-to:resent-cc:resent-message-id:in-reply-to:
references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe:
list-subscribe:list-post:list-owner:list-archive;
z=From:=20Fred=20Baker=20<fred@cisco.com>|Subject:=20Trend
=20report|Date:=20Tue,=2029=20Sep=202009=2007:10:57=20-07
00|Message-Id:=20<F52C50AC-6510-475E-A4D1-2DA93806B4B2@ci
sco.com>|To:=20re-ECN=20unIETF=20list=20<re-ecn@ietf.org>
|Mime-Version:=201.0=20(Apple=20Message=20framework=20v93
6)|Content-Transfer-Encoding:=207bit;
bh=SCx1TmabDPowjfmnHAUAJ1DtP9ncnRKIaDstMkAK/rY=;
b=ijymVaNZy772OjxuDGEtFjHavwo9fbnXodvzWLA9gOBjJfSEwCHiBvQP
cdMg7bba6+krc4hWPlkg04ShHsSTBFy1E8GhtdSJ7sMrDxDOHkYYHqQhz
gekCUtOADqLhTcjhgNUHkpEKzgV1qkRN61WuzjotqHM8TxTrLs1nORZQv 8=;
Authentication-Results: sj-iport-1.cisco.com;
dkim=pass (signature verified [TEST])
header.i=fred@cisco.com
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApoEANCywUqrR7MV/2dsb2JhbADAG4hTAY9/BYQe
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.44,473,1249257600"; d="scan'208";a="248453154"
Received: from sj-dkim-1.cisco.com ([171.71.179.21]) by sj-iport-1.cisco.com
with ESMTP; 29 Sep 2009 14:10:58 +0000
Received: from sj-core-5.cisco.com (sj-core-5.cisco.com [171.71.177.238]) by
sj-dkim-1.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id n8TEAv7S022229 for
<re-ecn@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Sep 2009 07:10:57 -0700
Received: from stealth-10-32-244-221.cisco.com
(stealth-10-32-244-221.cisco.com [10.32.244.221]) by sj-core-5.cisco.com
(8.13.8/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n8TEAv3s025236 for <re-ecn@ietf.org>;
Tue, 29 Sep 2009 14:10:57 GMT
Message-Id: <F52C50AC-6510-475E-A4D1-2DA93806B4B2@cisco.com>
From: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>
To: re-ECN unIETF list <re-ecn@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936)
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 07:10:57 -0700
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=585; t=1254233458; x=1255097458;
c=relaxed/simple; s=sjdkim1004;
h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version;
d=cisco.com; i=fred@cisco.com;
z=From:=20Fred=20Baker=20<fred@cisco.com> |Subject:=20Trend=20report
|Sender:=20; bh=SCx1TmabDPowjfmnHAUAJ1DtP9ncnRKIaDstMkAK/rY=;
b=dcUoBhLxAkEvki9tfX+dRW7sCqhIkeJhr6dY2HHCJheIPiqEHqh/ih9EMN
+SxDgWca0sminSzVeayuHizxG18TV6322Sc1c9GbonWv/uluAl6dckKWZ9Qu
LtjMV108OivZ23iYI3ZXoIPoKR0GULFienkJqywpEyTB34wo2fQ1g=;
Subject: [re-ECN] Trend report
X-BeenThere: re-ecn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: re-inserted explicit congestion notification <re-ecn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/re-ecn>,
<mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/re-ecn>
List-Post: <mailto:re-ecn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/re-ecn>,
<mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 14:09:42 -0000
~24 hours into this poll, let me report on the status. The poll is at
http://doodle.com/p7fvfpfebtey4xvp
11 people have stated a preference.
Of the names mentioned the other day:
6 Expect - EXPosing CongesTion
6 CEX - Congestion EXposure or Congestion Exposure eXperiments
8 ConEx - Congestion Exposure
4 CEEX - congestion experience exposure
3 CEEEX - congestion experience explicit exposure
and the rest are nil.
Again, these are not "people", they are "statements of preference"; a
person can, and most do, mark more than one option.
- [re-ECN] Trend report Fred Baker
- Re: [re-ECN] Trend report John Leslie
- Re: [re-ECN] Trend report Fred Baker