Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion Exposure community?
Lixia Zhang <lixia@CS.UCLA.EDU> Wed, 09 September 2009 19:24 UTC
Return-Path: <lixia@CS.UCLA.EDU>
X-Original-To: re-ecn@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: re-ecn@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id 897893A683E for <re-ecn@core3.amsl.com>;
Wed, 9 Sep 2009 12:24:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.302
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.302 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.297,
BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5gxVNbKJP3Hg for
<re-ecn@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Sep 2009 12:24:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.cs.ucla.edu (smtp.cs.ucla.edu [131.179.128.62]) by
core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A23523A6803 for <re-ecn@ietf.org>;
Wed, 9 Sep 2009 12:24:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by
smtp.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 182F239E8083 for <re-ecn@ietf.org>;
Wed, 9 Sep 2009 12:24:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at smtp.cs.ucla.edu
Received: from smtp.cs.ucla.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.cs.ucla.edu
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Pq9GlaI8K6Ez for
<re-ecn@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Sep 2009 12:24:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.1.5] (cpe-98-151-23-234.socal.res.rr.com [98.151.23.234])
by smtp.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43E8F39E807B for
<re-ecn@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Sep 2009 12:24:41 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <2BA42E63-9ED1-41C4-BF28-3E7CC3338523@CS.UCLA.EDU>
From: Lixia Zhang <lixia@CS.UCLA.EDU>
To: re-ecn@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <200909041706.n84H6rfQ030463@bagheera.jungle.bt.co.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936)
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 12:24:40 -0700
References: <200909041706.n84H6rfQ030463@bagheera.jungle.bt.co.uk>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936)
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 02:38:53 -0700
Subject: Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion Exposure community?
X-BeenThere: re-ecn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: re-inserted explicit congestion notification <re-ecn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/re-ecn>,
<mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/re-ecn>
List-Post: <mailto:re-ecn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/re-ecn>,
<mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2009 19:24:16 -0000
Like Aaron, I realized that I already missed the Monday deadline, and I very much share what Aaron said in his reply that - the topic is relevant - getting right people to the room is important (and need effort) - I may not have lots cycles to work on it myself, but can try - my hand-up for having this BOF Lixia > Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2009 17:33:36 +0100 > To: re-ecn@ietf.org > From: Bob Briscoe <rbriscoe@jungle.bt.co.uk> > Subject: Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion Exposure community? > > Folks, > > I'd like to try to arrange a Congestion Exposure (re-ECN) BoF in Nov > at the Hiroshima IETF. If so, we have to notify the area directors v > soon - by 24:00 UTC Mon 7 Sep 09. #1 gating function for Area > Directors: activity on an ietf list. > > Therefore, pls respond preferably *on this list* if you're > interested in being involved, no matter how insignificantly, e.g. > > - you want congestion visibility for other stuff you're doing > (but don't intend to work on it itself) > - reviewing docs, > - alternative way to achieve congestion exposure > - participate in mailing list discussion, > - co-authoring docs > - design ways to do incremental deployment > - using code for other stuff you're doing > - thinking up new uses for the protocol > - breaking it > - analysing benefits/costs > - implement protocol > - implement a demo > - running or participating in trials > - standing on the sidelines booing or clapping > - whatever > > Perceived problem: > Most people want to work on something finite like a new cool non-TCP- > friendly congestion control. Less people want to go into an pseudo- > infinite loop fixing IP to allow other cool stuff to happen. If you > want something like re-ECN to be there, but don't have the bandwidth > to work on it, that's cool too - please say this - it's still > palpable support. And you will be likely to have review comments > related to how you want to use it. > > Cheers > > > Bob > > ________________________________________________________________ > Bob Briscoe, Networks Research Centre, BT Research
- [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion Exp… Bob Briscoe
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Michael Welzl
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Soo-Hyun Choi
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Agarwal, Anil
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Woundy, Richard
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Michael Menth
- [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion Exp… Costas Courcoubetis
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Mirja Kuehlewind
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Bob Briscoe
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Howard Green
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Bruce Davie
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… marcelo bagnulo braun
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Tom Taylor
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Rolf Winter
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Steven J Bauer
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Kwok Ho Chan
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Richard Bennett
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Don Bowman
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Steven Blake
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Scott Brim
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Matt Mathis
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Janardhan Iyengar
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Leslie Daigle
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Varghese Reji-A16389
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Mayutan A.
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… ken carlberg
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Bob Briscoe
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Bob Briscoe
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… PAPADIMITRIOU Dimitri
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… João Taveira Araújo
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… marcelo bagnulo braun
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Ford, Alan
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Bob Briscoe
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Anna Charny (acharny)
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… João Taveira Araújo
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… marcelo bagnulo braun
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Bob Briscoe
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… João Taveira Araújo
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Bob Briscoe
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Ingemar Johansson S
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Barbara van Schewick
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… alan.p.smith
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Piers O'Hanlon
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Zaheduzzaman Sarker
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Dragana Damjanovic
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Joe Babiarz
- Re: [re-ECN] Fwd: Pls respond: Do we have a Conge… Aaron Falk
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Bob Briscoe
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Bob Briscoe
- Re: [re-ECN] Fwd: Pls respond: Do we have a Conge… Bob Briscoe
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Lixia Zhang
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Livingood, Jason
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Piers O'Hanlon
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Bob Briscoe