Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion Exposure community?

Lixia Zhang <lixia@CS.UCLA.EDU> Wed, 09 September 2009 19:24 UTC

Return-Path: <lixia@CS.UCLA.EDU>
X-Original-To: re-ecn@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: re-ecn@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 897893A683E for <re-ecn@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Sep 2009 12:24:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.302
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.302 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.297, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5gxVNbKJP3Hg for <re-ecn@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Sep 2009 12:24:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.cs.ucla.edu (smtp.cs.ucla.edu [131.179.128.62]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A23523A6803 for <re-ecn@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Sep 2009 12:24:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 182F239E8083 for <re-ecn@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Sep 2009 12:24:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at smtp.cs.ucla.edu
Received: from smtp.cs.ucla.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.cs.ucla.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Pq9GlaI8K6Ez for <re-ecn@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Sep 2009 12:24:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.1.5] (cpe-98-151-23-234.socal.res.rr.com [98.151.23.234]) by smtp.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43E8F39E807B for <re-ecn@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Sep 2009 12:24:41 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <2BA42E63-9ED1-41C4-BF28-3E7CC3338523@CS.UCLA.EDU>
From: Lixia Zhang <lixia@CS.UCLA.EDU>
To: re-ecn@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <200909041706.n84H6rfQ030463@bagheera.jungle.bt.co.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936)
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 12:24:40 -0700
References: <200909041706.n84H6rfQ030463@bagheera.jungle.bt.co.uk>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936)
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 02:38:53 -0700
Subject: Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion Exposure community?
X-BeenThere: re-ecn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: re-inserted explicit congestion notification <re-ecn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/re-ecn>, <mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/re-ecn>
List-Post: <mailto:re-ecn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/re-ecn>, <mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2009 19:24:16 -0000

Like Aaron, I realized that I already missed the Monday deadline, and  
I very much share what Aaron said in his reply that
- the topic is relevant
- getting right people to the room is important (and need effort)
- I may not have lots cycles to work on it myself, but can try
- my hand-up for having this BOF

Lixia

> Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2009 17:33:36 +0100
> To: re-ecn@ietf.org
> From: Bob Briscoe <rbriscoe@jungle.bt.co.uk>
> Subject: Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion Exposure community?
>
> Folks,
>
> I'd like to try to arrange a Congestion Exposure (re-ECN) BoF in Nov  
> at the Hiroshima IETF. If so, we have to notify the area directors v  
> soon - by 24:00 UTC Mon 7 Sep 09. #1 gating function for Area  
> Directors: activity on an ietf list.
>
> Therefore, pls respond preferably *on this list* if you're  
> interested in being involved, no matter how insignificantly, e.g.
>
> - you want congestion visibility for other stuff you're doing
>  (but don't intend to work on it itself)
> - reviewing docs,
> - alternative way to achieve congestion exposure
> - participate in mailing list discussion,
> - co-authoring docs
> - design ways to do incremental deployment
> - using code for other stuff you're doing
> - thinking up new uses for the protocol
> - breaking it
> - analysing benefits/costs
> - implement protocol
> - implement a demo
> - running or participating in trials
> - standing on the sidelines booing or clapping
> - whatever
>
> Perceived problem:
> Most people want to work on something finite like a new cool non-TCP- 
> friendly congestion control. Less people want to go into an pseudo- 
> infinite loop fixing IP to allow other cool stuff to happen. If you  
> want something like re-ECN to be there, but don't have the bandwidth  
> to work on it, that's cool too - please say this - it's still  
> palpable support. And you will be likely to have review comments  
> related to how you want to use it.
>
> Cheers
>
>
> Bob
>
> ________________________________________________________________
> Bob Briscoe,               Networks Research Centre, BT Research