Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion Exposurecommunity?
"Varghese Reji-A16389" <Reji.Varghese@motorola.com> Sat, 05 September 2009 05:30 UTC
Return-Path: <Reji.Varghese@motorola.com>
X-Original-To: re-ecn@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: re-ecn@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id 022293A66B4 for <re-ecn@core3.amsl.com>;
Fri, 4 Sep 2009 22:30:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bn0wAusAYsPa for
<re-ecn@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Sep 2009 22:30:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail153.messagelabs.com (mail153.messagelabs.com
[216.82.253.51]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D86473A67B2 for
<re-ecn@ietf.org>; Fri, 4 Sep 2009 22:30:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-VirusChecked: Checked
X-Env-Sender: Reji.Varghese@motorola.com
X-Msg-Ref: server-5.tower-153.messagelabs.com!1252128660!9592069!1
X-StarScan-Version: 6.1.3; banners=-,-,-
X-Originating-IP: [129.188.136.8]
Received: (qmail 32618 invoked from network); 5 Sep 2009 05:31:01 -0000
Received: from motgate8.mot.com (HELO motgate8.mot.com) (129.188.136.8) by
server-5.tower-153.messagelabs.com with DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP;
5 Sep 2009 05:31:01 -0000
Received: from il06exr04.mot.com (il06exr04.mot.com [129.188.137.134]) by
motgate8.mot.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n855UtiZ012479 for
<re-ecn@ietf.org>; Fri, 4 Sep 2009 22:31:00 -0700 (MST)
Received: from il06vts03.mot.com (il06vts03.mot.com [129.188.137.143]) by
il06exr04.mot.com (8.13.1/Vontu) with SMTP id n855Utag003648 for
<re-ecn@ietf.org>; Sat, 5 Sep 2009 00:30:55 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from ZMY16EXM67.ds.mot.com (zmy16exm67.ap.mot.com [10.179.4.27]) by
il06exr04.mot.com (8.13.1/8.13.0) with ESMTP id n855UrwM003644 for
<re-ecn@ietf.org>; Sat, 5 Sep 2009 00:30:54 -0500 (CDT)
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01CA2DE9.FC443AFA"
Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2009 13:28:17 +0800
Message-ID: <36AA252D80F2584CAF9649BCE8EC87ED146958@ZMY16EXM67.ds.mot.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion Exposurecommunity?
Thread-Index: AcotsNVR13wKcNDnTj6bcB2CvsirGwAONcJ2
References: <4AA19776.1000104@thinkingcat.com>
From: "Varghese Reji-A16389" <Reji.Varghese@motorola.com>
To: <re-ecn@ietf.org>
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Subject: Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion Exposurecommunity?
X-BeenThere: re-ecn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: re-inserted explicit congestion notification <re-ecn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/re-ecn>,
<mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/re-ecn>
List-Post: <mailto:re-ecn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/re-ecn>,
<mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Sep 2009 05:30:41 -0000
Hi,
I'm interested in getting involved in this effort, though I may not be able to work directly on any items, right away. I would like to take part in mailing list discussions and in reviewing documents.
Regards
Reji Varghese
[Bob wrote:]
> Folks,
>
> I'd like to try to arrange a Congestion Exposure (re-ECN) BoF in Nov
> at the Hiroshima IETF. If so, we have to notify the area directors v
> soon - by 24:00 UTC Mon 7 Sep 09. #1 gating function for Area
> Directors: activity on an ietf list.
>
> Therefore, pls respond preferably *on this list* if you're interested
> in being involved, no matter how insignificantly, e.g.
>
> - you want congestion visibility for other stuff you're doing (but
> don't intend to work on it itself) - reviewing docs, - alternative
> way to achieve congestion exposure - participate in mailing list
> discussion, - co-authoring docs - design ways to do incremental
> deployment - using code for other stuff you're doing - thinking up
> new uses for the protocol - breaking it - analysing benefits/costs -
> implement protocol - implement a demo - running or participating in
> trials - standing on the sidelines booing or clapping - whatever
>
> Perceived problem: Most people want to work on something finite like
> a new cool non-TCP-friendly congestion control. Less people want to
> go into an pseudo-infinite loop fixing IP to allow other cool stuff
> to happen. If you want something like re-ECN to be there, but don't
> have the bandwidth to work on it, that's cool too - please say this -
> it's still palpable support. And you will be likely to have review
> comments related to how you want to use it.
>
> Cheers
>
>
> Bob
>
> ________________________________________________________________ Bob
> Briscoe, Networks Research Centre, BT Research
--
-------------------------------------------------------------------
"Reality:
Yours to discover."
-- ThinkingCat
Leslie Daigle
leslie@thinkingcat.com
-------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
re-ECN mailing list
re-ECN@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/re-ecn
- [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion Exp… Bob Briscoe
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Michael Welzl
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Soo-Hyun Choi
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Agarwal, Anil
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Woundy, Richard
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Michael Menth
- [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion Exp… Costas Courcoubetis
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Mirja Kuehlewind
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Bob Briscoe
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Howard Green
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Bruce Davie
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… marcelo bagnulo braun
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Tom Taylor
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Rolf Winter
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Steven J Bauer
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Kwok Ho Chan
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Richard Bennett
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Don Bowman
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Steven Blake
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Scott Brim
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Matt Mathis
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Janardhan Iyengar
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Leslie Daigle
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Varghese Reji-A16389
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Mayutan A.
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… ken carlberg
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Bob Briscoe
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Bob Briscoe
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… PAPADIMITRIOU Dimitri
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… João Taveira Araújo
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… marcelo bagnulo braun
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Ford, Alan
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Bob Briscoe
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Anna Charny (acharny)
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… João Taveira Araújo
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… marcelo bagnulo braun
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Bob Briscoe
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… João Taveira Araújo
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Bob Briscoe
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Ingemar Johansson S
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Barbara van Schewick
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… alan.p.smith
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Piers O'Hanlon
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Zaheduzzaman Sarker
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Dragana Damjanovic
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Joe Babiarz
- Re: [re-ECN] Fwd: Pls respond: Do we have a Conge… Aaron Falk
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Bob Briscoe
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Bob Briscoe
- Re: [re-ECN] Fwd: Pls respond: Do we have a Conge… Bob Briscoe
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Lixia Zhang
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Livingood, Jason
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Piers O'Hanlon
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Bob Briscoe