IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [re-ECN] Draft Agenda

"Ingemar Johansson S" <ingemar.s.johansson@ericsson.com> Fri, 09 October 2009 06:24 UTC

Return-Path: <ingemar.s.johansson@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: re-ecn@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: re-ecn@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F3003A67E6 for <re-ecn@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Oct 2009 23:24:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.509
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.509 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.740, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Pas32Ye-EOrq for <re-ecn@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Oct 2009 23:24:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailgw5.ericsson.se (mailgw5.ericsson.se [193.180.251.36]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34BCB3A67BE for <re-ecn@ietf.org>; Thu, 8 Oct 2009 23:24:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb24-b7ba0ae000005786-04-4aced7845c0f
Received: from esealmw128.eemea.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.124]) by mailgw5.ericsson.se (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 90.D0.22406.487DECA4; Fri, 9 Oct 2009 08:26:12 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from esealmw109.eemea.ericsson.se ([153.88.200.2]) by esealmw128.eemea.ericsson.se with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Fri, 9 Oct 2009 08:26:12 +0200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2009 08:26:10 +0200
Message-ID: <130EBB38279E9847BAAAE0B8F9905F8C01FCFF3C@esealmw109.eemea.ericsson.se>
In-Reply-To: <mailman.6614.1255031691.4737.re-ecn@ietf.org>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: Draft Agenda
Thread-Index: AcpIUXJn5/JVndfHTlW3vKo3+A8TmQAV3NOA
References: <mailman.6614.1255031691.4737.re-ecn@ietf.org>
From: "Ingemar Johansson S" <ingemar.s.johansson@ericsson.com>
To: <re-ecn@ietf.org>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 09 Oct 2009 06:26:12.0031 (UTC) FILETIME=[655654F0:01CA48A9]
X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA==
Subject: Re: [re-ECN] Draft Agenda
X-BeenThere: re-ecn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: re-inserted explicit congestion notification <re-ecn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/re-ecn>, <mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/re-ecn>
List-Post: <mailto:re-ecn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/re-ecn>, <mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Oct 2009 06:24:31 -0000

Hi

My personal feeling is that a demo would be good. There are some worries
that this exercise is purely academic, while a demo wont remove all the
concerns it may help to remove at least some of them

/Ingemar

> 
> Message: 1
> Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2009 15:56:24 -0400
> From: "Woundy, Richard" <Richard_Woundy@cable.comcast.com>
> Subject: Re: [re-ECN] Draft Agenda
> To: <toby.moncaster@bt.com>
> Cc: re-ecn@ietf.org
> Message-ID:
> 	
snip snip...

> 
> I am not optimistic that a skeptic, e.g. "it's just Bob's 
> pipe dream", will be convinced by a short scripted demo 
> during the BoF. At the same time, it seems way too early in 
> the IETF process to reject a concept based on implementation 
> issues, so I'm not sure the skeptic's objection would be 
> valid in any case.
> 
> That's my input on the demo -- I'll leave it to your and 
> Alan's best judgment about where to go from here.
> 
> -- Rich
> 
> P.S. Here is what I used as a basis for learning styles:
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Learning_style#Other_models and 
> http://www.metamath.com/lsweb/fourls.htm. I am not a 
> psychologist or neuroscientist, so your mileage may vary.
>

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email