Re: [re-ECN] Comments on "congestion exposure problem" document
"Ingemar Johansson S" <ingemar.s.johansson@ericsson.com> Wed, 30 September 2009 06:54 UTC
Return-Path: <ingemar.s.johansson@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: re-ecn@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: re-ecn@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id B8C7E3A6847 for <re-ecn@core3.amsl.com>;
Tue, 29 Sep 2009 23:54:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.476
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.476 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.773,
BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iVloxEloOsd2 for
<re-ecn@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Sep 2009 23:54:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailgw4.ericsson.se (mailgw4.ericsson.se [193.180.251.62]) by
core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 923A83A682B for <re-ecn@ietf.org>;
Tue, 29 Sep 2009 23:54:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb3e-b7b63ae0000049dc-70-4ac300d6cf47
Received: from esealmw128.eemea.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.125])
by mailgw4.ericsson.se (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id
C7.21.18908.6D003CA4; Wed, 30 Sep 2009 08:55:18 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from esealmw109.eemea.ericsson.se ([153.88.200.2]) by
esealmw128.eemea.ericsson.se with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959);
Wed, 30 Sep 2009 08:53:48 +0200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 08:53:47 +0200
Message-ID: <130EBB38279E9847BAAAE0B8F9905F8C01ECF43A@esealmw109.eemea.ericsson.se>
In-Reply-To: <130EBB38279E9847BAAAE0B8F9905F8C01ECF41D@esealmw109.eemea.ericsson.se>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: Comments on "congestion exposure problem" document
Thread-Index: AcpA33Op6QhYLGeERfW9Jr6i1XdutgAsyg2QAAH139A=
References: <mailman.4777.1254213095.4737.re-ecn@ietf.org>
<130EBB38279E9847BAAAE0B8F9905F8C01ECF41D@esealmw109.eemea.ericsson.se>
From: "Ingemar Johansson S" <ingemar.s.johansson@ericsson.com>
To: <re-ecn@ietf.org>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 30 Sep 2009 06:53:48.0824 (UTC)
FILETIME=[C3252180:01CA419A]
X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA==
Cc: Ingemar Johansson S <ingemar.s.johansson@ericsson.com>
Subject: Re: [re-ECN] Comments on "congestion exposure problem" document
X-BeenThere: re-ecn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: re-inserted explicit congestion notification <re-ecn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/re-ecn>,
<mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/re-ecn>
List-Post: <mailto:re-ecn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/re-ecn>,
<mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 06:54:01 -0000
Hi I read through the latest "congestion exposure problem" document A few comments: Section 5.1, last sentence in first para: "The main effect of this has been that users now routinely see their network connections running slow in the evenings" >From a laymans perspective I can probably agree with this, I experience it every now than then when I "surf the internet" from home. I have however not been able to determine for sure if the problem is in the network or in the webservers. I would believe that a reference to scientific paper or mailing list discussion or whatever that describes this problem would be beneficial. Section 6 (Use cases): Maybe obvious (and maybe does not fit into the use cases) but as I see it the future results of this WG would be to provide mainly the operators with at least one of the tools necessary to give e.g content providers and application developers a sustainable "carrot and whip" offer. "Make your traffic behave according to these rules and you're granted access to our network". I have no opinion regarding what kinds of traffic this would include, I guess time will tell, but the main task for the WG should be to provide with one important item to the "carrot and whip" toolbox. PS.. Resent as the first effort looked like crap on the list Regards /Ingemar
- [re-ECN] Comments on "congestion exposure problem… Ingemar Johansson S
- Re: [re-ECN] Comments on "congestion exposure pro… Ingemar Johansson S
- Re: [re-ECN] Comments on "congestion exposure pro… toby.moncaster