Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion Exposure community?

"Ingemar Johansson S" <ingemar.s.johansson@ericsson.com> Mon, 07 September 2009 07:42 UTC

Return-Path: <ingemar.s.johansson@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: re-ecn@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: re-ecn@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 839223A67B2 for <re-ecn@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Sep 2009 00:42:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.418
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.418 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.831, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pf6SPqdFeAZC for <re-ecn@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Sep 2009 00:42:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailgw4.ericsson.se (mailgw4.ericsson.se [193.180.251.62]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB1DD28C12A for <re-ecn@ietf.org>; Mon, 7 Sep 2009 00:42:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb3e-b7c00ae0000007bf-d7-4aa4b97279c5
Received: from esealmw126.eemea.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.125]) by mailgw4.ericsson.se (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id EF.B0.01983.279B4AA4; Mon, 7 Sep 2009 09:42:42 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from esealmw109.eemea.ericsson.se ([153.88.200.2]) by esealmw126.eemea.ericsson.se with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Mon, 7 Sep 2009 09:42:41 +0200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2009 09:42:41 +0200
Message-ID: <130EBB38279E9847BAAAE0B8F9905F8C01C3A575@esealmw109.eemea.ericsson.se>
In-Reply-To: <mailman.924.1252082539.4737.re-ecn@ietf.org>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion Exposure community?
Thread-Index: AcotfrkxL+7cN65xTC6vrmnkOfDanQCDkUEQ
References: <mailman.924.1252082539.4737.re-ecn@ietf.org>
From: "Ingemar Johansson S" <ingemar.s.johansson@ericsson.com>
To: <re-ecn@ietf.org>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 07 Sep 2009 07:42:41.0645 (UTC) FILETIME=[C7BDD9D0:01CA2F8E]
X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA==
Subject: Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion Exposure community?
X-BeenThere: re-ecn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: re-inserted explicit congestion notification <re-ecn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/re-ecn>, <mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/re-ecn>
List-Post: <mailto:re-ecn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/re-ecn>, <mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Sep 2009 07:42:22 -0000

Hi

I am interested in this work.
I will try to focus my involvement (as much as possible) to the
application/transport layer aspects, initially I can help with reviewing
docs and participate in email discussions. In the future, depending on
how things evolve and if time permits I can possibly run simulations
where HSPA/LTE access is involved.

Regards
/Ingemar

> -----Original Message-----
> From: re-ecn-bounces@ietf.org 
> [mailto:re-ecn-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Bob Briscoe
> Sent: Wednesday, September 02, 2009 9:34 AM
> To: re-ecn@ietf.org
> Subject: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion 
> Exposure community?
> 
> Folks,
> 
> I'd like to try to arrange a Congestion Exposure (re-ECN) BoF 
> in Nov at the Hiroshima IETF. If so, we have to notify the 
> area directors v soon - by 24:00 UTC Mon 7 Sep 09. #1 gating 
> function for Area
> Directors: activity on an ietf list.
> 
> Therefore, pls respond preferably *on this list* if you're 
> interested in being involved, no matter how insignificantly, e.g.
> 
> - you want congestion visibility for other stuff you're doing
>    (but don't intend to work on it itself)
> - reviewing docs,
> - alternative way to achieve congestion exposure
> - participate in mailing list discussion,
> - co-authoring docs
> - design ways to do incremental deployment
> - using code for other stuff you're doing
> - thinking up new uses for the protocol
> - breaking it
> - analysing benefits/costs
> - implement protocol
> - implement a demo
> - running or participating in trials
> - standing on the sidelines booing or clapping
> - whatever
> 
> Perceived problem:
> Most people want to work on something finite like a new cool 
> non-TCP-friendly congestion control. Less people want to go 
> into an pseudo-infinite loop fixing IP to allow other cool 
> stuff to happen. 
> If you want something like re-ECN to be there, but don't have 
> the bandwidth to work on it, that's cool too - please say 
> this - it's still palpable support. And you will be likely to 
> have review comments related to how you want to use it.
> 
> Cheers
> 
> 
> Bob
> 
> 
> ________________________________________________________________
> Bob Briscoe,               Networks Research Centre, BT Research 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> re-ECN mailing list
> re-ECN@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/re-ecn
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> re-ECN mailing list
> re-ECN@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/re-ecn
> 
> 
> End of re-ECN Digest, Vol 7, Issue 14
> *************************************
>