Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion Exposure community?
"Ingemar Johansson S" <ingemar.s.johansson@ericsson.com> Mon, 07 September 2009 07:42 UTC
Return-Path: <ingemar.s.johansson@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: re-ecn@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: re-ecn@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id 839223A67B2 for <re-ecn@core3.amsl.com>;
Mon, 7 Sep 2009 00:42:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.418
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.418 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.831,
BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pf6SPqdFeAZC for
<re-ecn@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Sep 2009 00:42:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailgw4.ericsson.se (mailgw4.ericsson.se [193.180.251.62]) by
core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB1DD28C12A for <re-ecn@ietf.org>;
Mon, 7 Sep 2009 00:42:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb3e-b7c00ae0000007bf-d7-4aa4b97279c5
Received: from esealmw126.eemea.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.125])
by mailgw4.ericsson.se (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id
EF.B0.01983.279B4AA4; Mon, 7 Sep 2009 09:42:42 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from esealmw109.eemea.ericsson.se ([153.88.200.2]) by
esealmw126.eemea.ericsson.se with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959);
Mon, 7 Sep 2009 09:42:41 +0200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2009 09:42:41 +0200
Message-ID: <130EBB38279E9847BAAAE0B8F9905F8C01C3A575@esealmw109.eemea.ericsson.se>
In-Reply-To: <mailman.924.1252082539.4737.re-ecn@ietf.org>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion Exposure community?
Thread-Index: AcotfrkxL+7cN65xTC6vrmnkOfDanQCDkUEQ
References: <mailman.924.1252082539.4737.re-ecn@ietf.org>
From: "Ingemar Johansson S" <ingemar.s.johansson@ericsson.com>
To: <re-ecn@ietf.org>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 07 Sep 2009 07:42:41.0645 (UTC)
FILETIME=[C7BDD9D0:01CA2F8E]
X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA==
Subject: Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion Exposure community?
X-BeenThere: re-ecn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: re-inserted explicit congestion notification <re-ecn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/re-ecn>,
<mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/re-ecn>
List-Post: <mailto:re-ecn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/re-ecn>,
<mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Sep 2009 07:42:22 -0000
Hi I am interested in this work. I will try to focus my involvement (as much as possible) to the application/transport layer aspects, initially I can help with reviewing docs and participate in email discussions. In the future, depending on how things evolve and if time permits I can possibly run simulations where HSPA/LTE access is involved. Regards /Ingemar > -----Original Message----- > From: re-ecn-bounces@ietf.org > [mailto:re-ecn-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Bob Briscoe > Sent: Wednesday, September 02, 2009 9:34 AM > To: re-ecn@ietf.org > Subject: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion > Exposure community? > > Folks, > > I'd like to try to arrange a Congestion Exposure (re-ECN) BoF > in Nov at the Hiroshima IETF. If so, we have to notify the > area directors v soon - by 24:00 UTC Mon 7 Sep 09. #1 gating > function for Area > Directors: activity on an ietf list. > > Therefore, pls respond preferably *on this list* if you're > interested in being involved, no matter how insignificantly, e.g. > > - you want congestion visibility for other stuff you're doing > (but don't intend to work on it itself) > - reviewing docs, > - alternative way to achieve congestion exposure > - participate in mailing list discussion, > - co-authoring docs > - design ways to do incremental deployment > - using code for other stuff you're doing > - thinking up new uses for the protocol > - breaking it > - analysing benefits/costs > - implement protocol > - implement a demo > - running or participating in trials > - standing on the sidelines booing or clapping > - whatever > > Perceived problem: > Most people want to work on something finite like a new cool > non-TCP-friendly congestion control. Less people want to go > into an pseudo-infinite loop fixing IP to allow other cool > stuff to happen. > If you want something like re-ECN to be there, but don't have > the bandwidth to work on it, that's cool too - please say > this - it's still palpable support. And you will be likely to > have review comments related to how you want to use it. > > Cheers > > > Bob > > > ________________________________________________________________ > Bob Briscoe, Networks Research Centre, BT Research > > _______________________________________________ > re-ECN mailing list > re-ECN@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/re-ecn > > > ------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > re-ECN mailing list > re-ECN@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/re-ecn > > > End of re-ECN Digest, Vol 7, Issue 14 > ************************************* >
- [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion Exp… Bob Briscoe
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Michael Welzl
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Soo-Hyun Choi
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Agarwal, Anil
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Woundy, Richard
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Michael Menth
- [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion Exp… Costas Courcoubetis
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Mirja Kuehlewind
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Bob Briscoe
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Howard Green
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Bruce Davie
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… marcelo bagnulo braun
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Tom Taylor
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Rolf Winter
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Steven J Bauer
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Kwok Ho Chan
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Richard Bennett
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Don Bowman
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Steven Blake
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Scott Brim
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Matt Mathis
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Janardhan Iyengar
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Leslie Daigle
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Varghese Reji-A16389
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Mayutan A.
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… ken carlberg
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Bob Briscoe
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Bob Briscoe
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… PAPADIMITRIOU Dimitri
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… João Taveira Araújo
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… marcelo bagnulo braun
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Ford, Alan
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Bob Briscoe
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Anna Charny (acharny)
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… João Taveira Araújo
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… marcelo bagnulo braun
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Bob Briscoe
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… João Taveira Araújo
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Bob Briscoe
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Ingemar Johansson S
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Barbara van Schewick
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… alan.p.smith
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Piers O'Hanlon
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Zaheduzzaman Sarker
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Dragana Damjanovic
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Joe Babiarz
- Re: [re-ECN] Fwd: Pls respond: Do we have a Conge… Aaron Falk
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Bob Briscoe
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Bob Briscoe
- Re: [re-ECN] Fwd: Pls respond: Do we have a Conge… Bob Briscoe
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Lixia Zhang
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Livingood, Jason
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Piers O'Hanlon
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Bob Briscoe