Re: [re-ECN] Trend report
Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com> Wed, 30 September 2009 15:11 UTC
Return-Path: <fred@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: re-ecn@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: re-ecn@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id 3E3743A69F4 for <re-ecn@core3.amsl.com>;
Wed, 30 Sep 2009 08:11:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.176
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.176 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.423,
BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GbWpZFNGBoXO for
<re-ecn@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Sep 2009 08:11:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sj-iport-1.cisco.com (sj-iport-1.cisco.com [171.71.176.70]) by
core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 431AE3A69C4 for <re-ecn@ietf.org>;
Wed, 30 Sep 2009 08:11:13 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com;
i=fred@cisco.com; l=907; q=dns/txt; s=sjiport01001; t=1254323556; x=1255533156;
h=from:sender:reply-to:subject:date:message-id:to:cc: mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-id:
content-description:resent-date:resent-from:resent-sender:
resent-to:resent-cc:resent-message-id:in-reply-to:
references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe:
list-subscribe:list-post:list-owner:list-archive;
z=From:=20Fred=20Baker=20<fred@cisco.com>|Subject:=20Re: =20[re-ECN]=20Trend=20report|Date:=20Wed,=2030=20Sep=2020
09=2008:12:35=20-0700|Message-Id:=20<98883D9B-A082-48EE-A
439-ACD6C22EE710@cisco.com>|To:=20re-ECN=20unIETF=20list
=20<re-ecn@ietf.org>|Mime-Version:=201.0=20(Apple=20Messa
ge=20framework=20v936)|Content-Transfer-Encoding:=207bit
|In-Reply-To:=20<F52C50AC-6510-475E-A4D1-2DA93806B4B2@cis
co.com>|References:=20<F52C50AC-6510-475E-A4D1-2DA93806B4 B2@cisco.com>;
bh=OdlzLaxw+kfluHvVJz8CsG0JUTITnxgCgopmFus/jog=;
b=FMCF6IzFQ/ZcQWnbI4Y8kdScmOAFwCVQ5zU45ve4mYpnYvk+kO+ALIr7
Kn+8IUNA8+COe090sKH/xLhP1j3ge58b+FKarNGKsNrUtwASTlUgStuqQ
qbguONINUCGOeRn7bM91SRr2DCzSyXpOgUCDEWHU8m8JBGWVcRpJlnrLf 8=;
Authentication-Results: sj-iport-1.cisco.com;
dkim=pass (signature verified [TEST])
header.i=fred@cisco.com
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApoEAFwSw0qrR7PE/2dsb2JhbADAS4hbAZAJBoQn
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.44,480,1249257600"; d="scan'208";a="249094017"
Received: from sj-dkim-4.cisco.com ([171.71.179.196]) by sj-iport-1.cisco.com
with ESMTP; 30 Sep 2009 15:12:36 +0000
Received: from sj-core-5.cisco.com (sj-core-5.cisco.com [171.71.177.238]) by
sj-dkim-4.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id n8UFCa3d017880 for
<re-ecn@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Sep 2009 08:12:36 -0700
Received: from stealth-10-32-244-221.cisco.com
(stealth-10-32-244-221.cisco.com [10.32.244.221]) by sj-core-5.cisco.com
(8.13.8/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n8UFCa5k029386 for <re-ecn@ietf.org>;
Wed, 30 Sep 2009 15:12:36 GMT
Message-Id: <98883D9B-A082-48EE-A439-ACD6C22EE710@cisco.com>
From: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>
To: re-ECN unIETF list <re-ecn@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <F52C50AC-6510-475E-A4D1-2DA93806B4B2@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936)
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 08:12:35 -0700
References: <F52C50AC-6510-475E-A4D1-2DA93806B4B2@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=907; t=1254323556; x=1255187556;
c=relaxed/simple; s=sjdkim4002;
h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version;
d=cisco.com; i=fred@cisco.com;
z=From:=20Fred=20Baker=20<fred@cisco.com>
|Subject:=20Re=3A=20[re-ECN]=20Trend=20report |Sender:=20;
bh=OdlzLaxw+kfluHvVJz8CsG0JUTITnxgCgopmFus/jog=;
b=tgJIgX6mcKZBD7/+pYn0BJzjix33u7ZRwLQTNaEeTW8lbnKIHCooe2w/qP
3vajS8RFl4YxMdUJJl1QEdt9DamYZWdJZajn3gkp6w4X6RZnQWpM+/d+QOuJ u3c0mVW0zr;
Subject: Re: [re-ECN] Trend report
X-BeenThere: re-ecn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: re-inserted explicit congestion notification <re-ecn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/re-ecn>,
<mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/re-ecn>
List-Post: <mailto:re-ecn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/re-ecn>,
<mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 15:11:14 -0000
Near as I can tell, people are probably done responding. The
statistics this morning are {7, 7, 10, 5, 3}.
On Sep 29, 2009, at 7:10 AM, Fred Baker wrote:
> ~24 hours into this poll, let me report on the status. The poll is at
> http://doodle.com/p7fvfpfebtey4xvp
>
> 11 people have stated a preference.
>
> Of the names mentioned the other day:
> 6 Expect - EXPosing CongesTion
> 6 CEX - Congestion EXposure or Congestion Exposure eXperiments
> 8 ConEx - Congestion Exposure
> 4 CEEX - congestion experience exposure
> 3 CEEEX - congestion experience explicit exposure
>
> and the rest are nil.
>
> Again, these are not "people", they are "statements of preference";
> a person can, and most do, mark more than one option.
> _______________________________________________
> re-ECN mailing list
> re-ECN@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/re-ecn
- [re-ECN] Trend report Fred Baker
- Re: [re-ECN] Trend report John Leslie
- Re: [re-ECN] Trend report Fred Baker