[re-ECN] DRAFT charter
Leslie Daigle <leslie@thinkingcat.com> Thu, 05 November 2009 05:57 UTC
Return-Path: <leslie@thinkingcat.com>
X-Original-To: re-ecn@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: re-ecn@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id 7310D3A6781 for <re-ecn@core3.amsl.com>;
Wed, 4 Nov 2009 21:57:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SCcVSvDemw23 for
<re-ecn@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Nov 2009 21:57:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from zeke.ecotroph.net (zeke.ecotroph.net [70.164.19.155]) by
core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78E1D3A63EC for <re-ecn@ietf.org>;
Wed, 4 Nov 2009 21:57:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from beethoven.local ([::ffff:72.254.105.208]) (AUTH: PLAIN leslie,
SSL: TLSv1/SSLv3,256bits,AES256-SHA) by zeke.ecotroph.net with esmtp;
Thu, 05 Nov 2009 00:57:44 -0500 id 015B008E.4AF26959.000029B9
Message-ID: <4AF26950.90208@thinkingcat.com>
Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2009 00:57:36 -0500
From: Leslie Daigle <leslie@thinkingcat.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Macintosh/20090812)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: re-ecn@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [re-ECN] DRAFT charter
X-BeenThere: re-ecn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: re-inserted explicit congestion notification <re-ecn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/re-ecn>,
<mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/re-ecn>
List-Post: <mailto:re-ecn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/re-ecn>,
<mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2009 05:57:29 -0000
Hi,
Here's a draft charter for a potential WG in this area. Note that we
have to be pretty successful in working our way through the BoF agenda
to even get to a point where it is sensible to discuss a charter, but it
seemed reasonable to have a draft in hand.
CONEX Charter
The purpose of the CONEX working group is to develop a mechanism to
allow senders to inform the network of the level of congestion they
expect their packets to encounter. This information is currently only
visible at the transport layer. With the output of CONEX, it will be
possible to provide sufficient information in each IP datagram so that
any node in the network can see the expected rest-of-path congestion.
Once any node can see the impact it causes (and suffers) by sending or
forwarding packets, it will be possible to hold senders and whole
networks accountable for the congestion they cause downstream. Tools
that exploit the CONEX output could be used for mitigating distributed
denial of service (DDoS); simplifying differentiation of quality of
service (QoS); policing compliance to congestion control; and so on.
Output of the CONEX WG will include:
o An applicability statement -- the specific cases in which CONEX is
useful, especially in different network conditions, incremental
deployment considerations, etc.
o Specification of IP (v4 and v6) packet structure to encapsulate
congestion exposure information (header bits, interpretation)
o Use cases -- possible uses of the CONEX information to reduce
congestion and/or increase accountability for it
o Specification of necessary CONEX features in TCP, for example to carry
congestion information from receiver to sender
o Analysis of security threats from falsifying or suppressing CONEX
information
Future work may include specifications to implement one or more use cases.
Milestones [Hopelessly ambitious for now -- to be hammered out when the
output is settled]
Feb 2010 Draft applicability statement (-00)
Mar 2010 Evaluation of candidate protocol approaches
Apr 2010 Determination of protocol approach
May 2010 Draft use cases (-00)
Jun 2010 Revised applicability statement
Jun 2010 Draft CONEX IPv4 specification (-00)
Jun 2010 Draft CONEX IPv6 specification (-00)
Dec 2010 Revised CONEX IPv4 specification
Dec 2010 Revised CONEX IPv6 specification
Jan 2011 Revised use cases
--
-------------------------------------------------------------------
"Reality:
Yours to discover."
-- ThinkingCat
Leslie Daigle
leslie@thinkingcat.com
-------------------------------------------------------------------
- [re-ECN] DRAFT charter Leslie Daigle
- Re: [re-ECN] DRAFT charter toby.moncaster
- Re: [re-ECN] DRAFT charter marcelo bagnulo braun
- Re: [re-ECN] DRAFT charter Leslie Daigle
- Re: [re-ECN] DRAFT charter ken carlberg
- Re: [re-ECN] DRAFT charter Leslie Daigle