Re: [re-ECN] Fwd: Congestion Exposure (re-ECN): to BoF or to Bar BoF?
Lars Eggert <lars.eggert@nokia.com> Fri, 22 May 2009 02:04 UTC
Return-Path: <lars.eggert@nokia.com>
X-Original-To: re-ecn@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: re-ecn@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id 6F0FA3A6987 for <re-ecn@core3.amsl.com>;
Thu, 21 May 2009 19:04:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.549
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.549 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.050,
BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XstjH0j5FQwJ for
<re-ecn@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 May 2009 19:04:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.fit.nokia.com (mail.fit.nokia.com [195.148.124.195]) by
core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63D7C3A680C for <re-ecn@ietf.org>;
Thu, 21 May 2009 19:04:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.18] (event-241.akiba-b.hpcc.jp [192.50.75.241])
(authenticated bits=0) by mail.fit.nokia.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id
n4M25C3I085725 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT);
Fri, 22 May 2009 05:05:20 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from lars.eggert@nokia.com)
Message-Id: <ED0A9E9D-F966-4F9C-98DB-5CE1D3F4C3AC@nokia.com>
From: Lars Eggert <lars.eggert@nokia.com>
To: Bob Briscoe <rbriscoe@jungle.bt.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <200905220155.n4M1tvp2022022@bagheera.jungle.bt.co.uk>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=Apple-Mail-10-510218004; micalg=sha1;
protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v935.3)
Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 11:05:06 +0900
References: <200905220155.n4M1tvp2022022@bagheera.jungle.bt.co.uk>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.935.3)
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.2
(mail.fit.nokia.com [212.213.221.39]); Fri, 22 May 2009 05:06:06 +0300 (EEST)
Cc: re-ECN unIETF list <re-ecn@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [re-ECN] Fwd: Congestion Exposure (re-ECN): to BoF or to Bar BoF?
X-BeenThere: re-ecn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: re-inserted explicit congestion notification <re-ecn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/re-ecn>,
<mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/re-ecn>
List-Post: <mailto:re-ecn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/re-ecn>,
<mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 02:04:33 -0000
On 2009-5-22, at 10:56, Bob Briscoe wrote: > This list has been dead for a while. Do you intend to close this list then, or keep it around to organize a possible future effort (after the tsvarea discussion)? Lars