IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [re-ECN] Pls bash: Congestion Exposure (re-ECN) BoF in Hiroshima?

<toby.moncaster@bt.com> Tue, 08 September 2009 10:18 UTC

Return-Path: <toby.moncaster@bt.com>
X-Original-To: re-ecn@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: re-ecn@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78A803A6890 for <re-ecn@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Sep 2009 03:18:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.603
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.603 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.204, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_72=0.6, J_CHICKENPOX_91=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bI88x9lKFqFm for <re-ecn@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Sep 2009 03:18:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp3.smtp.bt.com (smtp3.smtp.bt.com [217.32.164.138]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 909BE3A69F4 for <re-ecn@ietf.org>; Tue, 8 Sep 2009 03:18:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from E03MVZ1-UKDY.domain1.systemhost.net ([193.113.30.61]) by smtp3.smtp.bt.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Tue, 8 Sep 2009 11:19:06 +0100
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 11:19:05 +0100
Message-ID: <AEDCAF87EEC94F49BA92EBDD49854CC70CF2BCE5@E03MVZ1-UKDY.domain1.systemhost.net>
In-Reply-To: <7D6FD9F3-B80E-4227-B215-EA22F20552CF@g11.org.uk>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [re-ECN] Pls bash: Congestion Exposure (re-ECN) BoF in Hiroshima?
Thread-Index: AcowbOBDm+bk6tUHQLKnuACLToj3YAAALuLQ
References: <200909071019.n87AJgBB030579@bagheera.jungle.bt.co.uk> <AEDCAF87EEC94F49BA92EBDD49854CC70CEB8418@E03MVZ1-UKDY.domain1.systemhost.net> <8A82D1BFEDDE7E4597978355239BBBCB04389F@PACDCEXCMB06.cable.comcast.com> <AEDCAF87EEC94F49BA92EBDD49854CC70CF2B7C9@E03MVZ1-UKDY.domain1.systemhost.net> <20090907164107.GR8532@verdi> <AEDCAF87EEC94F49BA92EBDD49854CC70CF2B885@E03MVZ1-UKDY.domain1.systemhost.net> <200909080035.n880Zs1t012039@bagheera.jungle.bt.co.uk> <AEDCAF87EEC94F49BA92EBDD49854CC70CF2BAD1@E03MVZ1-UKDY.domain1.systemhost.net> <7D6FD9F3-B80E-4227-B215-EA22F20552CF@g11.org.uk>
From: <toby.moncaster@bt.com>
To: <carlberg@g11.org.uk>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 08 Sep 2009 10:19:06.0665 (UTC) FILETIME=[CC100190:01CA306D]
Cc: re-ecn@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [re-ECN] Pls bash: Congestion Exposure (re-ECN) BoF in Hiroshima?
X-BeenThere: re-ecn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: re-inserted explicit congestion notification <re-ecn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/re-ecn>, <mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/re-ecn>
List-Post: <mailto:re-ecn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/re-ecn>, <mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2009 10:18:38 -0000

That's a much clearer way of phrasing what I was trying to say :-)

I am working on a draft problem statement and should have an
introduction available for people to comment on in a few hours...

Toby

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ken carlberg [mailto:carlberg@g11.org.uk]
> Sent: 08 September 2009 11:12
> To: Moncaster,T,Toby,DER3 R
> Cc: Briscoe,RJ,Bob,XVR9 BRISCORJ R; re-ecn@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [re-ECN] Pls bash: Congestion Exposure (re-ECN) BoF in
> Hiroshima?
> 
> 
> On Sep 8, 2009, at 4:52 AM, <toby.moncaster@bt.com> wrote:
> 
> > 2) Define EXACTLY the problem we are addressing (by writing a
problem
> > statement document). And keep this concise and focussed (e.g. only
> > concentrate on a single aspect).
> 
> one other thing that is related and helpful in this initial process is
> to bring up a discussion of what is and is not in scope for the BoF.
> 
> -ken

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email