Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion Exposure community?
Steven J Bauer <bauer@MIT.EDU> Fri, 04 September 2009 18:31 UTC
Return-Path: <bauer@MIT.EDU>
X-Original-To: re-ecn@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: re-ecn@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id 65BA13A6801 for <re-ecn@core3.amsl.com>;
Fri, 4 Sep 2009 11:31:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No,
score=-3.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.001,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RxlLROZ76X6l for
<re-ecn@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Sep 2009 11:31:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from south-station-annex.mit.edu (SOUTH-STATION-ANNEX.MIT.EDU
[18.72.1.2]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62E103A67B3 for
<re-ecn@ietf.org>; Fri, 4 Sep 2009 11:31:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from grand-central-station.mit.edu (GRAND-CENTRAL-STATION.MIT.EDU
[18.7.21.82]) by south-station-annex.mit.edu (8.13.6/8.9.2) with ESMTP id
n84IUFPp012959 for <re-ecn@ietf.org>; Fri, 4 Sep 2009 14:30:15 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from outgoing-legacy.mit.edu (OUTGOING-LEGACY.MIT.EDU [18.7.22.104])
by grand-central-station.mit.edu (8.13.6/8.9.2) with ESMTP id n84IU139003316
for <re-ecn@ietf.org>; Fri, 4 Sep 2009 14:30:06 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from webmail-2.mit.edu (WEBMAIL-2.MIT.EDU [18.9.23.12]) ) by
outgoing-legacy.mit.edu (8.13.6/8.12.4) with ESMTP id n84IU0Tc005436 for
<re-ecn@ietf.org>; Fri, 4 Sep 2009 14:30:00 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from webmail-2.mit.edu (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by
webmail-2.mit.edu (8.13.8) with ESMTP id n84ITiAG019141;
Fri, 4 Sep 2009 14:29:44 -0400
Received: (from nobody@localhost) by webmail-2.mit.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit)
id n84IThnP019140 for re-ecn@ietf.org; Fri, 4 Sep 2009 14:29:43 -0400
X-Authentication-Warning: webmail-2.mit.edu: nobody set sender to
bauer@mit.edu using -f
Received: from wd3.csail.mit.edu (wd3.csail.mit.edu [18.26.1.91]) (User
authenticated as bauer@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by webmail.mit.edu (Horde MIME
library) with HTTP; Fri, 04 Sep 2009 14:29:43 -0400
Message-ID: <20090904142943.5lncw16twok8w4ws@webmail.mit.edu>
Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2009 14:29:43 -0400
From: Steven J Bauer <bauer@MIT.EDU>
To: re-ecn@ietf.org
References: <200909041608.n84G8Ztp029170@bagheera.jungle.bt.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <200909041608.n84G8Ztp029170@bagheera.jungle.bt.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format="flowed"
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H3 (4.0.3)
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.42
Subject: Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion Exposure community?
X-BeenThere: re-ecn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: re-inserted explicit congestion notification <re-ecn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/re-ecn>,
<mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/re-ecn>
List-Post: <mailto:re-ecn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/re-ecn>,
<mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2009 18:31:11 -0000
> Therefore, pls respond preferably *on this list* if you're interested > in being involved, no matter how insignificantly, e.g. > > - you want congestion visibility for other stuff you're doing > - reviewing docs, > - alternative way to achieve congestion exposure > - participate in mailing list discussion, > - co-authoring docs > - design ways to do incremental deployment > - using code for other stuff you're doing > - thinking up new uses for the protocol > - breaking it > - analysing benefits/costs > - running or participating in trials This is squarely in the middle of things we are very interested in in our research group (Advanced Network Architecture) at MIT. We are particularly interested in the above work items. Steven Bauer MIT
- [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion Exp… Bob Briscoe
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Michael Welzl
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Soo-Hyun Choi
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Agarwal, Anil
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Woundy, Richard
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Michael Menth
- [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion Exp… Costas Courcoubetis
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Mirja Kuehlewind
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Bob Briscoe
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Howard Green
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Bruce Davie
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… marcelo bagnulo braun
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Tom Taylor
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Rolf Winter
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Steven J Bauer
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Kwok Ho Chan
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Richard Bennett
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Don Bowman
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Steven Blake
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Scott Brim
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Matt Mathis
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Janardhan Iyengar
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Leslie Daigle
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Varghese Reji-A16389
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Mayutan A.
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… ken carlberg
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Bob Briscoe
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Bob Briscoe
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… PAPADIMITRIOU Dimitri
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… João Taveira Araújo
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… marcelo bagnulo braun
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Ford, Alan
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Bob Briscoe
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Anna Charny (acharny)
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… João Taveira Araújo
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… marcelo bagnulo braun
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Bob Briscoe
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… João Taveira Araújo
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Bob Briscoe
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Ingemar Johansson S
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Barbara van Schewick
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… alan.p.smith
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Piers O'Hanlon
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Zaheduzzaman Sarker
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Dragana Damjanovic
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Joe Babiarz
- Re: [re-ECN] Fwd: Pls respond: Do we have a Conge… Aaron Falk
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Bob Briscoe
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Bob Briscoe
- Re: [re-ECN] Fwd: Pls respond: Do we have a Conge… Bob Briscoe
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Lixia Zhang
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Livingood, Jason
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Piers O'Hanlon
- Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion… Bob Briscoe