[re-ECN] Fwd: Pls bash: Congestion Exposure (re-ECN) BoF in Hiroshima?

Bob Briscoe <rbriscoe@jungle.bt.co.uk> Fri, 04 September 2009 15:37 UTC

Return-Path: <rbriscoe@jungle.bt.co.uk>
X-Original-To: re-ecn@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: re-ecn@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AF1B3A6903 for <re-ecn@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Sep 2009 08:37:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.869
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.869 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.248, BAYES_00=-2.599, DNS_FROM_RFC_BOGUSMX=1.482, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DsKXXN1xIZsI for <re-ecn@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Sep 2009 08:36:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp3.smtp.bt.com (smtp3.smtp.bt.com [217.32.164.138]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 765903A68DE for <re-ecn@ietf.org>; Fri, 4 Sep 2009 08:36:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from i2kc08-ukbr.domain1.systemhost.net ([193.113.197.71]) by smtp3.smtp.bt.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Fri, 4 Sep 2009 16:36:46 +0100
Received: from cbibipnt08.iuser.iroot.adidom.com ([147.149.100.81]) by i2kc08-ukbr.domain1.systemhost.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Fri, 4 Sep 2009 16:36:46 +0100
Received: From bagheera.jungle.bt.co.uk ([132.146.168.158]) by cbibipnt08.iuser.iroot.adidom.com (WebShield SMTP v4.5 MR1a P0803.399); id 1252078605543; Fri, 4 Sep 2009 16:36:45 +0100
Received: from MUT.jungle.bt.co.uk ([10.215.130.87]) by bagheera.jungle.bt.co.uk (8.13.5/8.12.8) with ESMTP id n84Fah0G028653 for <re-ecn@ietf.org>; Fri, 4 Sep 2009 16:36:43 +0100
Message-Id: <200909041536.n84Fah0G028653@bagheera.jungle.bt.co.uk>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9
Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2009 16:36:43 +0100
To: re-ECN unIETF list <re-ecn@ietf.org>
From: Bob Briscoe <rbriscoe@jungle.bt.co.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.56 on 132.146.168.158
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 04 Sep 2009 15:36:46.0557 (UTC) FILETIME=[82FDB8D0:01CA2D75]
Subject: [re-ECN] Fwd: Pls bash: Congestion Exposure (re-ECN) BoF in Hiroshima?
X-BeenThere: re-ecn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: re-inserted explicit congestion notification <re-ecn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/re-ecn>, <mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/re-ecn>
List-Post: <mailto:re-ecn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/re-ecn>, <mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2009 15:37:04 -0000

Folks,

Does anyone want to help co-author the BoF proposal (by Monday night)?
Or specifically commit to review it?


Bob


>Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2009 17:32:25 +0100
>To: re-ecn@ietf.org
>From: Bob Briscoe <rbriscoe@jungle.bt.co.uk>
>Subject: Pls bash: Congestion Exposure (re-ECN) BoF in Hiroshima?
>
>Hi Folks,
>
>I'd like to try to arrange a Congestion Exposure (re-ECN) BoF in Nov 
>at the Hiroshima IETF. Pls bash the following proposals.
>
>A/ Basic idea: Expose Congestion at network layer, so operators can 
>encourage endpoint behaviours that minimise congestion while 
>maximising performance (e.g. LEDBAT).
>
>B/ Which Area?
>I suggest we should notify Int Area & Transport Area, but I imagine 
>Transport Area would own this.
>
>C/ Community (see separate mail)
>
>D/ Ultimate documents to deliver (draft charter milestones):...?
>1. (INF) Motivating cases for congestion exposure
>2. (EXP) protocol spec (re-ECN is one proposal)
>    - choosing an encoding in IP, plus alternative encodings in an appendix
>3. <if the encoding uses bit 48 in IPv4>
>    (STD) Reassign value 1 of bit 48 from 'reserved' to 'experimental use'
>    Also describe conditions on experiments, e.g.:
>    - confined in space and in time
>    - multiple simultaneous experiments with same value would need v 
> strong case
>4. (INF) Report(s) on experimental uses of protocols
>
>E/ Supporting text to work on
>- BoF Description     (by 07 Sep 09 BoF deadline - Monday!!)
>- Proposed BoF Agenda (by 28 Oct 09 WG agendas deadline)
>- Problem statement   (by 19 Oct 09 I-D deadline)
>- Protocol proposal(s) (by 19 Oct 09 I-D deadline)
>- have I missed anything?
>
>F/ Other requirements
>- What's the "elevator pitch"?
>- Demo? Of what? The protocol, or a use of the protocol? What use?
>- BoF Chairs x2 (Rich Woundy has volunteered)
>
>_____
>Minutes of Stockholm Bar BoF where we discussed this, and links to 
>supporting docs so far:
><http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/tsv/trac/wiki/re-ECN>
>
>
>
>Bob
>
>________________________________________________________________
>Bob Briscoe,               Networks Research Centre, BT Research

________________________________________________________________
Bob Briscoe,               Networks Research Centre, BT Research