IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion Exposure community?

Michael Welzl <michawe@ifi.uio.no> Wed, 02 September 2009 17:10 UTC

Return-Path: <michawe@ifi.uio.no>
X-Original-To: re-ecn@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: re-ecn@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61E273A6A7E for <re-ecn@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Sep 2009 10:10:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.245
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.245 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.354, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2oCRBOT-qo9g for <re-ecn@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Sep 2009 10:10:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-out1.uio.no (mail-out1.uio.no [129.240.10.57]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E5773A6884 for <re-ecn@ietf.org>; Wed, 2 Sep 2009 10:10:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-mx2.uio.no ([129.240.10.30]) by mail-out1.uio.no with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <michawe@ifi.uio.no>) id 1MitKY-0005Wd-EE; Wed, 02 Sep 2009 19:09:10 +0200
Received: from timon129.uio.no ([129.240.250.129] helo=[127.0.0.1]) by mail-mx2.uio.no with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <michawe@ifi.uio.no>) id 1MitKY-0008V1-2x; Wed, 02 Sep 2009 19:09:10 +0200
Message-ID: <4A9EA6BB.1040003@ifi.uio.no>
Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2009 19:09:15 +0200
From: Michael Welzl <michawe@ifi.uio.no>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Bob Briscoe <rbriscoe@jungle.bt.co.uk>
References: <200909021633.n82GXbsp012052@bagheera.jungle.bt.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <200909021633.n82GXbsp012052@bagheera.jungle.bt.co.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-UiO-Ratelimit-Test: rcpts/h 3 msgs/h 2 sum rcpts/h 7 sum msgs/h 3 total rcpts 3053 max rcpts/h 33 ratelimit 0
X-UiO-Spam-info: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-5.0, required=5.0, autolearn=disabled, UIO_MAIL_IS_INTERNAL=-5, uiobl=NO, uiouri=NO)
X-UiO-Scanned: 0572EB87CA791FEBBD65CFC541EA5B90E945C63B
X-UiO-SPAM-Test: remote_host: 129.240.250.129 spam_score: -49 maxlevel 80 minaction 2 bait 0 mail/h: 2 total 1817 max/h 13 blacklist 0 greylist 0 ratelimit 0
Cc: re-ecn@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion Exposure community?
X-BeenThere: re-ecn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: re-inserted explicit congestion notification <re-ecn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/re-ecn>, <mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/re-ecn>
List-Post: <mailto:re-ecn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/re-ecn>, <mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2009 17:10:42 -0000

Hi,

> people want to go into an pseudo-infinite loop fixing IP to allow 
> other cool stuff to happen. If you want something like re-ECN to be 
> there, but don't have the bandwidth to work on it, that's cool too - 
> please say this - it's still palpable support. And you will be likely 
> to have review comments related to how you 

For now, I fall in this category (and with "for now", I only mean the
bandwidth thing, not the opinion of course  :-)   )

Cheers,
Michael

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email