Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion Exposure community?

Bob Briscoe <rbriscoe@jungle.bt.co.uk> Wed, 09 September 2009 21:00 UTC

Return-Path: <rbriscoe@jungle.bt.co.uk>
X-Original-To: re-ecn@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: re-ecn@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 647D73A687F for <re-ecn@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Sep 2009 14:00:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.852
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.852 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.265, BAYES_00=-2.599, DNS_FROM_RFC_BOGUSMX=1.482, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aV8GmCPHEwLe for <re-ecn@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Sep 2009 14:00:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp3.smtp.bt.com (smtp3.smtp.bt.com [217.32.164.138]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62B5E3A682D for <re-ecn@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Sep 2009 14:00:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from i2kc06-ukbr.domain1.systemhost.net ([193.113.197.70]) by smtp3.smtp.bt.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Wed, 9 Sep 2009 22:00:33 +0100
Received: from cbibipnt05.iuser.iroot.adidom.com ([147.149.196.177]) by i2kc06-ukbr.domain1.systemhost.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Wed, 9 Sep 2009 22:00:33 +0100
Received: From bagheera.jungle.bt.co.uk ([132.146.168.158]) by cbibipnt05.iuser.iroot.adidom.com (WebShield SMTP v4.5 MR1a P0803.399); id 1252530032811; Wed, 9 Sep 2009 22:00:32 +0100
Received: from MUT.jungle.bt.co.uk ([10.73.61.4]) by bagheera.jungle.bt.co.uk (8.13.5/8.12.8) with ESMTP id n89L0T8C021086; Wed, 9 Sep 2009 22:00:30 +0100
Message-Id: <200909092100.n89L0T8C021086@bagheera.jungle.bt.co.uk>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9
Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2009 22:00:28 +0100
To: Dragana Damjanovic <Dragana.Damjanovic@uibk.ac.at>
From: Bob Briscoe <rbriscoe@jungle.bt.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <1252414082.4aa652830002e@web-mail1.uibk.ac.at>
References: <200909041611.n84GBpnS029196@bagheera.jungle.bt.co.uk> <abe39f780909080451s5723b591kef876931be377df3@mail.gmail.com> <1252414082.4aa652830002e@web-mail1.uibk.ac.at>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.56 on 132.146.168.158
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 09 Sep 2009 21:00:33.0677 (UTC) FILETIME=[9285BBD0:01CA3190]
Cc: re-ecn@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion Exposure community?
X-BeenThere: re-ecn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: re-inserted explicit congestion notification <re-ecn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/re-ecn>, <mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/re-ecn>
List-Post: <mailto:re-ecn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/re-ecn>, <mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2009 21:00:08 -0000

Dragana,

Never too late. Thank you for your note of support.


Bob


At 13:48 08/09/2009, Dragana Damjanovic wrote:

>It is a bit late, but I would just  like  to say that I  am also interested in
>this BoF and further  activities.
>
>Cheers,
>Dragana
>
>
> >
> > > Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2009 17:33:36 +0100
> > > To: re-ecn@ietf.org
> > > From: Bob Briscoe <rbriscoe@jungle.bt.co.uk>
> > > Subject: Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion Exposure community?
> > >
> > > Folks,
> > >
> > > I'd like to try to arrange a Congestion Exposure (re-ECN) BoF 
> in Nov at the
> > Hiroshima IETF. If so, we have to notify the area directors v 
> soon - by 24:00
> > UTC Mon 7 Sep 09. #1 gating function for Area Directors: activity 
> on an ietf
> > list.
> > >
> > > Therefore, pls respond preferably *on this list* if you're interested in
> > being involved, no matter how insignificantly, e.g.
> > >
> > > - you want congestion visibility for other stuff you're doing
> > >  (but don't intend to work on it itself)
> > > - reviewing docs,
> > > - alternative way to achieve congestion exposure
> > > - participate in mailing list discussion,
> > > - co-authoring docs
> > > - design ways to do incremental deployment
> > > - using code for other stuff you're doing
> > > - thinking up new uses for the protocol
> > > - breaking it
> > > - analysing benefits/costs
> > > - implement protocol
> > > - implement a demo
> > > - running or participating in trials
> > > - standing on the sidelines booing or clapping
> > > - whatever
> > >
> > > Perceived problem:
> > > Most people want to work on something finite like a new cool
> > non-TCP-friendly congestion control. Less people want to go into an
> > pseudo-infinite loop fixing IP to allow other cool stuff to happen. If you
> > want something like re-ECN to be there, but don't have the 
> bandwidth to work
> > on it, that's cool too - please say this - it's still palpable support. And
> > you will be likely to have review comments related to how you 
> want to use it.
> > >
> > > Cheers
> > >
> > >
> > > Bob
> > >
> > > ________________________________________________________________
> > > Bob Briscoe,               Networks Research Centre, BT Research
> >
> > ________________________________________________________________
> > Bob Briscoe,               Networks Research Centre, BT Research
> > _______________________________________________
> > re-ECN mailing list
> > re-ECN@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/re-ecn
> >
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>re-ECN mailing list
>re-ECN@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/re-ecn

________________________________________________________________
Bob Briscoe,               Networks Research Centre, BT Research