Re: [re-ECN] Fwd: Congestion Exposure (re-ECN): to BoF or to Bar BoF?
michawe@ifi.uio.no Sat, 23 May 2009 13:32 UTC
Return-Path: <michawe@ulrik.uio.no>
X-Original-To: re-ecn@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: re-ecn@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id F12C43A6C77 for <re-ecn@core3.amsl.com>;
Sat, 23 May 2009 06:32:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kk64i9Vw9BxL for
<re-ecn@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 23 May 2009 06:32:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-out2.uio.no (mail-out2.uio.no [129.240.10.58]) by
core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1ECC93A6810 for <re-ecn@ietf.org>;
Sat, 23 May 2009 06:32:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-mx4.uio.no ([129.240.10.45]) by mail-out2.uio.no with
esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <michawe@ulrik.uio.no>) id 1M7rMX-00014c-Dz;
Sat, 23 May 2009 15:34:09 +0200
Received: from w3prod-wm02.uio.no ([129.240.4.215] helo=webmail.uio.no) by
mail-mx4.uio.no with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) user michawe (Exim 4.69)
(envelope-from <michawe@ulrik.uio.no>) id 1M7rMW-00028H-U8;
Sat, 23 May 2009 15:34:09 +0200
Received: from 210.196.144.17 (SquirrelMail authenticated user michawe) by
webmail.uio.no with HTTP; Sat, 23 May 2009 15:34:09 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <935bcf51669a82c07626d62b42dcc394.squirrel@webmail.uio.no>
In-Reply-To: <200905220650.n4M6on2W031172@bagheera.jungle.bt.co.uk>
References: <200905220155.n4M1tvp2022022@bagheera.jungle.bt.co.uk>
<ED0A9E9D-F966-4F9C-98DB-5CE1D3F4C3AC@nokia.com>
<200905220650.n4M6on2W031172@bagheera.jungle.bt.co.uk>
Date: Sat, 23 May 2009 15:34:09 +0200 (CEST)
From: michawe@ifi.uio.no
To: "Bob Briscoe" <rbriscoe@jungle.bt.co.uk>
User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.17
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-UiO-Ratelimit-Test: rcpts/h 4 msgs/h 2 sum rcpts/h 5 sum msgs/h 3 total
rcpts 444 max rcpts/h 19 ratelimit 0
X-UiO-Spam-info: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-5.0, required=5.0,
autolearn=disabled, UIO_MAIL_IS_INTERNAL=-5, uiobl=NO, uiouri=_URIID_)
X-UiO-Scanned: 0A18C1C57AB6EA703C3BD3246FE1D2C983BFC5EA
X-UiO-SPAM-Test: remote_host: 129.240.4.215 spam_score: -49 maxlevel 80
minaction 2 bait 0 mail/h: 47 total 1315342 max/h 707 blacklist 0 greylist 0
ratelimit 0
Cc: re-ECN unIETF list <re-ecn@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [re-ECN] Fwd: Congestion Exposure (re-ECN): to BoF or to Bar BoF?
X-BeenThere: re-ecn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: re-inserted explicit congestion notification <re-ecn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/re-ecn>,
<mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/re-ecn>
List-Post: <mailto:re-ecn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/re-ecn>,
<mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 May 2009 13:37:01 -0000
By the way, I think this BoF session is a great plan and support it. Cheers, Michael > Lars, > > At 03:05 22/05/2009, Lars Eggert wrote: >>On 2009-5-22, at 10:56, Bob Briscoe wrote: >>>This list has been dead for a while. >> >>Do you intend to close this list then, or keep it around to organize a >>possible future effort (after the tsvarea discussion)? > > If a community re-forms as hoped, I'd hope to move BoF formation > discussion to this re-ecn@ietf.org list. Unless you'd prefer it to > remain on tsvarea. > > > Bob > > >>Lars >> > > ________________________________________________________________ > Bob Briscoe, Networks Research Centre, BT Research > > _______________________________________________ > re-ECN mailing list > re-ECN@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/re-ecn >