Re: [re-ECN] BoF Proposal for wider IETF
Tom Taylor <tom.taylor@rogers.com> Fri, 18 September 2009 17:14 UTC
Return-Path: <tom.taylor@rogers.com>
X-Original-To: re-ecn@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: re-ecn@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id 003F23A6894 for <re-ecn@core3.amsl.com>;
Fri, 18 Sep 2009 10:14:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.095
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.095 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.096,
BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_72=0.6]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rjnZJO0bCN7j for
<re-ecn@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 10:14:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp114.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com (smtp114.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com
[68.142.225.230]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 11AF63A68AE for
<re-ecn@ietf.org>; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 10:14:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 56350 invoked from network); 18 Sep 2009 17:14:53 -0000
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=rogers.com;
h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding;
b=3nEts95MKoijEUSQf8t3abamUIgyx885ZhnNIe0J5qiQjyPVJ0lWyDnmlkfjCrmg9h0SKQ+RKv0K08P7KJ/0MzDTGK/ZYdFB1LGgJS9R9XeP7UNaMxLRz9ZPpNzQop/zHKE4y6jRpyOPnyQs/B1Dme8BPJCm4Ay08rbijO5rRQs=
;
Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.0.100?) (tom.taylor@174.115.211.243 with
plain) by smtp114.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 18 Sep 2009 17:14:53 -0000
X-YMail-OSG: pdPraYoVM1nfixo8qsCEbpiEOqOpG5iBq6T4OZ0EbH7N3uXyOx8uwyds0zXU0QYIYA--
X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3
Message-ID: <4AB3C00A.5020501@rogers.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 13:14:50 -0400
From: Tom Taylor <tom.taylor@rogers.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: toby.moncaster@bt.com
References: <8A82D1BFEDDE7E4597978355239BBBCB05A348@PACDCEXCMB06.cable.comcast.com> <8A82D1BFEDDE7E4597978355239BBBCB2A1B75@PACDCEXCMB06.cable.comcast.com>
<AEDCAF87EEC94F49BA92EBDD49854CC70D1D1FDF@E03MVZ1-UKDY.domain1.systemhost.net>
In-Reply-To: <AEDCAF87EEC94F49BA92EBDD49854CC70D1D1FDF@E03MVZ1-UKDY.domain1.systemhost.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Richard_Woundy@cable.comcast.com, re-ecn@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [re-ECN] BoF Proposal for wider IETF
X-BeenThere: re-ecn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: re-inserted explicit congestion notification <re-ecn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/re-ecn>,
<mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/re-ecn>
List-Post: <mailto:re-ecn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/re-ecn>,
<mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 17:14:02 -0000
I'd be willing. toby.moncaster@bt.com wrote: > Just in case people are interested, it looks as though the IESG will > make their decisions on which BoFs to accept next Friday (25th). > > By that time it would be nice to have started some of the preliminary > work that will need to be done if we do get approval... One of the key > things we need to think about is suitable people to chair the BoF. I > believe Rich has already expressed an interest and so we would need to > find A.N.Other... > > Toby > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: re-ecn-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:re-ecn-bounces@ietf.org] On >> Behalf Of Woundy, Richard >> Sent: 10 September 2009 19:06 >> To: lars.eggert@nokia.com; Briscoe,RJ,Bob,XVR9 BRISCORJ R >> Cc: re-ecn@ietf.org >> Subject: Re: [re-ECN] BoF Proposal for wider IETF >> >> I think I found my own answer (yes, officially), per >> http://trac.tools.ietf.org/bof/trac/wiki/WikiStart#Transport. >> >> -- Rich >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: re-ecn-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:re-ecn-bounces@ietf.org] On >> Behalf >> Of Woundy, Richard >> Sent: Thursday, September 10, 2009 10:33 AM >> To: lars.eggert@nokia.com; rbriscoe@jungle.bt.co.uk >> Cc: re-ecn@ietf.org >> Subject: Re: [re-ECN] BoF Proposal for wider IETF >> >>> you need to have submitted a BOF proposal by the deadline. See >> RFC5434, >> Section 2, Step 5. >> >> Did we make the deadline? >> >> -- Rich >> _______________________________________________ >> re-ECN mailing list >> re-ECN@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/re-ecn >> _______________________________________________ >> re-ECN mailing list >> re-ECN@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/re-ecn > _______________________________________________ > re-ECN mailing list > re-ECN@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/re-ecn >
- [re-ECN] BoF Proposal for wider IETF Bob Briscoe
- Re: [re-ECN] BoF Proposal for wider IETF Lars Eggert
- Re: [re-ECN] BoF Proposal for wider IETF Woundy, Richard
- Re: [re-ECN] BoF Proposal for wider IETF Woundy, Richard
- Re: [re-ECN] BoF Proposal for wider IETF Bob Briscoe
- Re: [re-ECN] BoF Proposal for wider IETF toby.moncaster
- Re: [re-ECN] BoF Proposal for wider IETF Tom Taylor
- Re: [re-ECN] BoF Proposal for wider IETF Woundy, Richard
- Re: [re-ECN] BoF Proposal for wider IETF Woundy, Richard