IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion Exposure community?

Bob Briscoe <rbriscoe@jungle.bt.co.uk> Sat, 05 September 2009 11:35 UTC

Return-Path: <rbriscoe@jungle.bt.co.uk>
X-Original-To: re-ecn@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: re-ecn@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59B593A67D8 for <re-ecn@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 5 Sep 2009 04:35:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.081
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.081 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.453, BAYES_05=-1.11, DNS_FROM_RFC_BOGUSMX=1.482, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2QnQt0hodATB for <re-ecn@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 5 Sep 2009 04:35:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp3.smtp.bt.com (smtp3.smtp.bt.com [217.32.164.138]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4735A3A67F2 for <re-ecn@ietf.org>; Sat, 5 Sep 2009 04:35:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from i2kc08-ukbr.domain1.systemhost.net ([193.113.197.71]) by smtp3.smtp.bt.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Sat, 5 Sep 2009 12:08:03 +0100
Received: from cbibipnt08.iuser.iroot.adidom.com ([147.149.100.81]) by i2kc08-ukbr.domain1.systemhost.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Sat, 5 Sep 2009 12:08:02 +0100
Received: From bagheera.jungle.bt.co.uk ([132.146.168.158]) by cbibipnt08.iuser.iroot.adidom.com (WebShield SMTP v4.5 MR1a P0803.399); id 1252148881397; Sat, 5 Sep 2009 12:08:01 +0100
Received: from MUT.jungle.bt.co.uk ([10.73.176.93]) by bagheera.jungle.bt.co.uk (8.13.5/8.12.8) with ESMTP id n85B7w9r013320; Sat, 5 Sep 2009 12:07:58 +0100
Message-Id: <200909051107.n85B7w9r013320@bagheera.jungle.bt.co.uk>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9
Date: Sat, 05 Sep 2009 12:07:57 +0100
To: Matt Mathis <matt.mathis@gmail.com>
From: Bob Briscoe <rbriscoe@jungle.bt.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <fc0ff13d0909041413m49736da5j8856414c976d7885@mail.gmail.co m>
References: <1252086856.1118.47.camel@tachyon> <20090904203758.GD487@cisco.com> <fc0ff13d0909041413m49736da5j8856414c976d7885@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.56 on 132.146.168.158
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 05 Sep 2009 11:08:02.0884 (UTC) FILETIME=[22F23840:01CA2E19]
Cc: re-ecn@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [re-ECN] Pls respond: Do we have a Congestion Exposure community?
X-BeenThere: re-ecn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: re-inserted explicit congestion notification <re-ecn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/re-ecn>, <mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/re-ecn>
List-Post: <mailto:re-ecn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/re-ecn>, <mailto:re-ecn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Sep 2009 11:35:55 -0000

Matt,

At 22:13 04/09/2009, Matt Mathis wrote:
>Given that this week is high time for vacation and holiday travel,
>one week might not be sufficient polling time.

Yes, the timing was not as planned. But a fortnight ago I had a disk 
head crash on my laptop. Once I got another machine built and all my 
data scraped off back-ups and the old disk, we were only a few days 
from the deadline.

Also, once I got back, I had to deal with the rest of the stack that 
had overtaken events - including my employer continuing to try to 
manage the recession by making researchers into contract software 
developers for its product lines... Whoops, is this a public list?

But I think we're seeing enough interest on the list anyway - for now 
- even tho the US is asleep the rest of the world is still ticking.


Bob



________________________________________________________________
Bob Briscoe,               Networks Research Centre, BT Research

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email