Re: [Reap] [saag] PSA: New list for discussing EAP related methods
Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com> Fri, 27 October 2017 18:08 UTC
Return-Path: <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: reap@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: reap@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A369413F088; Fri, 27 Oct 2017 11:08:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2TUXVOjBGOAu; Fri, 27 Oct 2017 11:08:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg0-x236.google.com (mail-pg0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c05::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C34E913F3AC; Fri, 27 Oct 2017 11:08:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg0-x236.google.com with SMTP id y5so5856124pgq.7; Fri, 27 Oct 2017 11:08:29 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=mfLuGKQymS9Pve+iWDqSwLU/XAqvuuWAL12NUZs79G0=; b=it3+p7qq+tMWWu24Y/lXtbqNbyWlsYlhks9/BN45T40MjVbPzIMmJkvWIk1z5bYoNW Pk2oPLbxaQzIAbQO5UpuN0nzm30jZtiyN4hqCKAxgWBo+LlD6ZyCvUgTIXSrv0YM7K2H Q4TmmQjf3CMgtM+qil7CmS2yc7fGoelopfXTielJFDnLhOGKunckQkNWwfwSAPQyasxQ T/Rju/CEMTzSra4GAwhwvE9MN46hSI9FJx5QQixPJIR/9q6heMa231DHCsrPqUqwVUah xlwgKhDlMK4VOwQOTgJf1L4CQpYcQ+KMrGPMQzy/5pli4w+U1RQ0tefYNr7JncHBZ7i5 Sipg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=mfLuGKQymS9Pve+iWDqSwLU/XAqvuuWAL12NUZs79G0=; b=OkgBrotfqyVANY+5tTTf+0bluDN17DAfwJktDfvHNcWPaaJzrB0OugXrYCW1YJ3Xgi f979Y0OMzrWCGhAiF1gtj/Pl6l0Loi87q/YUzXvEB74H/F5z8MKK7PunIMf1lGgOXzA5 cRrVHbJnQ5ojhSPjICVRBqCMRSBwI7f6ryzL9kio69mz3klliuYYmmTfa9fxR3ee+hgg E+dMjWv+CjyTjGKAFqNDN0NWDgLpHox1RXGmORT/uQEOcwVk6PEgdUKerW5sfKpufWWs of1HNPTiwLC0g3zT3KsVtc/WNBm0GpgVH0HxTW9rORep+fY1Kwdv4bEBk9PCUdum2vqS zG9Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMCzsaWxgmprggTPlozZBGTQlZv1FI1m64lC3bEWW+K5uYOM7mYk+TMM POawfna2VqM5HAprZjTWcBh0nFpFsAVcZE1FpBk=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABhQp+TJw88MYEwrb3/WH/vr73KxRatVu52bcF93PJKkDVnO9VaeD8ryS0f2nffXeiafHytAsHNTuM9vL92znxUh9os=
X-Received: by 10.98.201.87 with SMTP id k84mr1225147pfg.109.1509127709345; Fri, 27 Oct 2017 11:08:29 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.100.186.194 with HTTP; Fri, 27 Oct 2017 11:07:48 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <dcbfbc1b-1638-57dd-af14-36fcbf848348@cisco.com>
References: <3dbe94b9-4b2d-1479-8433-8b040cb1cfba@ericsson.com> <CAOW+2ds9Sez7otrs682hqzzXR8qbJYAdPwW8A8TEL+ms_a0=UA@mail.gmail.com> <6b3dcad6-f00c-1fb9-4df6-19f3dc744371@ericsson.com> <CAHbuEH74=Ca8oEWS5YpFByP1o3GaC0NajrZ8ChJxQAoffTajUg@mail.gmail.com> <CAOW+2du_08fcfZs2878LsjnLV8L0cmDMa3pLN2cxQeHbFKxOCA@mail.gmail.com> <112200E8-0E1D-4A38-800D-54892BFF67F6@gmail.com> <dcbfbc1b-1638-57dd-af14-36fcbf848348@cisco.com>
From: Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2017 14:07:48 -0400
Message-ID: <CAHbuEH6Bm=nev2dNgPXsGz3WYMMDtqo2qQQpGWt8eCKRhOQY+g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
Cc: Bernard Aboba <bernard.aboba@gmail.com>, reap@ietf.org, Mohit Sethi <mohit.m.sethi@ericsson.com>, "saag@ietf.org" <saag@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/reap/HaWLlVwbiP8DRsX01XmEBAJvMDQ>
Subject: Re: [Reap] [saag] PSA: New list for discussing EAP related methods
X-BeenThere: reap@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "REAP \(RENEW\) EAP" <reap.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/reap>, <mailto:reap-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/reap/>
List-Post: <mailto:reap@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:reap-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/reap>, <mailto:reap-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2017 18:08:32 -0000
EKR and I chatted and agree using EMU is the best go forward plan. Thank you for raising the issue that slipped by us. Best regards, Kathleen On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 7:55 AM, Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> wrote: > Kathleen, > > So the plan is to close reap and use emu? > > Eliot > > > On 10/27/17 3:43 AM, Kathleen Moriarty wrote: > > That sounds like the best plan. > > Thank you, > Kathleen > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Oct 26, 2017, at 9:16 PM, Bernard Aboba <bernard.aboba@gmail.com> wrote: > > Yes, the EMU WG list has been used for discussion of EAP methods since the > WG closed. > > That list is a better venue for discussion of EAP methods than a new REAP > list, so as to ensure that proper attention is paid to backward > compatibility, IPR, security properties and other critical aspects of EAP > method design. > > After all, we are talking about a protocol that is 20+ years old that is > implemented on billions of devices, many of which utilize open-source. > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 11:53 AM, Kathleen Moriarty > <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 1:16 PM, Mohit Sethi <mohit.m.sethi@ericsson.com> >> wrote: >> > Hi Bernard, >> > >> > The EAP-TLS 1.3 document is a very rough drafty version that was >> > submitted >> > before the cut-off for the last IETF. As you rightly point out, it has >> > the >> > skeleton and a lot of material from RFC5216, and still many important >> > details are missing. >> > >> > The purpose of this list is to exactly receive these kind of comments. >> > Should RFC5216 be updated or obsoleted by this draft. And it would be >> > great >> > if we can have your contributions to the document. We will definitely >> > add an >> > acknowledgement section and contact the authors of RFC5216 to see if >> > they >> > can contribute and comment. We plan to have more EAP related >> > contributions >> > in the near future. We discussed this with the Security ADs and thought >> > that >> > a separate list would be appropriate to get feedback/criticism and >> > contributions from the folks interested. >> >> I'm sorry, I didn't realize that a revision of 5216 was involved and >> that the authors were not notified at the onset as is normal practice >> in case they want to continue as authors. Thank you for spotting this >> issue Bernard. >> >> Is there an existing list that should be used? Is there adequate >> overlap in objectives and personnel? >> >> Thank you, >> Kathleen >> >> > >> > --Mohit >> > >> > >> > On 10/26/2017 06:51 PM, Bernard Aboba wrote: >> > >> > There are existing functioning IETF mailing lists relating to EAP. >> > >> > Why are you starting yet another one? >> > >> > From what I can tell, the EAP-TLS 1.3 draft is merely a copy of RFC 5216 >> > (with no acknowledgement to the original authors) stating that EAP-TLS >> > implementations must support TLS 1.3. >> > >> > This is ridiculous because there are 1+ Billion existing implementations >> > out >> > there that >> > >> > >> > On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 6:02 AM, Mohit Sethi >> > <mohit.m.sethi@ericsson.com> >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> Dear all, >> >> >> >> We have started a mailing list for discussing new EAP related work that >> >> currently has no obvious home. The mailing list is called REAP (Renew >> >> EAP) >> >> reap@ietf.org and you can subscribe here: >> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/reap >> >> >> >> Recently several new EAP methods have been proposed. These include for >> >> example: >> >> >> >> EAP-TLS 1.3: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-mattsson-eap-tls13-00 >> >> >> >> EAP-NOOB: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-aura-eap-noob-02 >> >> >> >> EAP-SASL: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-vanrein-eap-sasl-00 >> >> >> >> The list serves as a venue for discussion of these and other EAP >> >> related >> >> drafts that will be submitted in the near future. As courtesy, we will >> >> post >> >> any new draft to SAAG, but we plan to continue the discussion only on >> >> the >> >> REAP mailing list. We have also asked for a short presentation slot >> >> during >> >> SECDISPATCH at IETF 100 in Singapore. >> >> >> >> Comments, early feedback, and discussion on existing or new work is >> >> more >> >> than welcome. >> >> >> >> --Mohit >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> saag mailing list >> >> saag@ietf.org >> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/saag >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > saag mailing list >> > saag@ietf.org >> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/saag >> > >> > >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > saag mailing list >> > saag@ietf.org >> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/saag >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Best regards, >> Kathleen > > > > > _______________________________________________ > saag mailing list > saag@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/saag > > -- Best regards, Kathleen
- [Reap] PSA: New list for discussing EAP related m… Mohit Sethi
- Re: [Reap] [saag] PSA: New list for discussing EA… Bernard Aboba
- Re: [Reap] [saag] PSA: New list for discussing EA… Mohit Sethi
- Re: [Reap] [saag] PSA: New list for discussing EA… Yoav Nir
- Re: [Reap] [saag] PSA: New list for discussing EA… David Mitton
- Re: [Reap] [saag] PSA: New list for discussing EA… Alan DeKok
- Re: [Reap] [saag] PSA: New list for discussing EA… Kathleen Moriarty
- Re: [Reap] [saag] PSA: New list for discussing EA… Mohit Sethi
- Re: [Reap] [saag] PSA: New list for discussing EA… Bernard Aboba
- Re: [Reap] [saag] PSA: New list for discussing EA… Bernard Aboba
- Re: [Reap] [saag] PSA: New list for discussing EA… Bernard Aboba
- Re: [Reap] [saag] PSA: New list for discussing EA… Kathleen Moriarty
- Re: [Reap] [saag] PSA: New list for discussing EA… Eliot Lear
- Re: [Reap] [saag] PSA: New list for discussing EA… Kathleen Moriarty
- Re: [Reap] [saag] PSA: New list for discussing EA… Zhen Cao
- Re: [Reap] [saag] PSA: New list for discussing EA… Bernard Aboba
- Re: [Reap] [saag] PSA: New list for discussing EA… Mohit Sethi
- [Reap] EAP - TLS 1.3 Mohit Sethi
- Re: [Reap] EAP - TLS 1.3 Bernard Aboba
- Re: [Reap] [Emu] EAP - TLS 1.3 Jari Arkko
- Re: [Reap] EAP - TLS 1.3 Alan DeKok
- Re: [Reap] EAP - TLS 1.3 Bernard Aboba
- Re: [Reap] EAP - TLS 1.3 Bernard Aboba
- Re: [Reap] [Emu] EAP - TLS 1.3 Bernard Aboba
- Re: [Reap] EAP - TLS 1.3 John Mattsson
- Re: [Reap] [Emu] EAP - TLS 1.3 John Mattsson