Re: [Recentattendees] [104all] Further Clarification Re: IETF 104 Preliminary Agenda

Dear All,
I'm disappointed to find that the number of conflicts for me at IETF-104 is
as high as in Bangkok which was two times higher than at any meeting
before. I'm stressed that I'll have to run from DetNet to BFD to deliver
presentations on work being done, forget being able to follow the
discussion adequately. If that's the new normal, then why to come to the
meeting at all.
I strongly encourage IESG to let us use all available time for WG sessions
and let attendees use their time for "corridor talks".

Regards,
Greg

On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 9:08 PM IETF Agenda <agenda@ietf.org> wrote:

> Hi everyone,
>
> Our message earlier today announcing the preliminary agenda [1] was
> missing some further context. As previously mentioned by Alissa after IETF
> 103 [2], the IESG wanted to continue the unstructured time experiment at
> IETF 104.
>
> Wednesday's schedule has regular sessions until 13:20, unstructured time
> in the afternoon, and the plenary in the evening at 17:10. This leaves
> almost four hours of unstructured time for attendees to reserve for side
> meetings. During this period, there will also be one unique Technology Deep
> Dive session with the acronym WGTLGO [3].
>
> Monday through Friday, we will have two rooms available for attendees to
> reserve for side meetings as usual. On Wednesday afternoon, we will have
> five rooms available for side meetings. Further details about how to sign
> up for these rooms will be announced shortly.
>
> Thanks,
> IETF Secretariat
>
>
> [1]
> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-announce/_JeP2fQ7rHPosZWpNtpl8I_uL5U
> [2]
> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-announce/H64AuTYhxsGqM1a8BfTkszCZyso
> [3]  https://www.ietf.org/blog/ietf104-bofs/
>
> --
> 104all mailing list
> 104all@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/104all
>