Re: [Recentattendees] [104all] Further Clarification Re: IETF 104 Preliminary Agenda

Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com> Mon, 25 February 2019 20:33 UTC

Return-Path: <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: recentattendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: recentattendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A360131011; Mon, 25 Feb 2019 12:33:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LrvHD94HUlGX; Mon, 25 Feb 2019 12:33:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ot1-x330.google.com (mail-ot1-x330.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::330]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2A750130FF5; Mon, 25 Feb 2019 12:33:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ot1-x330.google.com with SMTP id 32so9036447ota.12; Mon, 25 Feb 2019 12:33:30 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=iUu5Sks+lesdCJrNyZaS9DHfOWOugsX0eiDFqtDVzjY=; b=kZt542uEuX857kcVbl6bk4L5lhhuLORWcqoBY/3967mfZoEeab3GkeNHSWW6gWlx9q xZHgjhIhMXGCpHuyz12xp1w3bJylnJ7sHFceXbvq4WgZMCuzdMEvJ/N8pE/Q4PNnO2+p aHlzkWE4tdDZl3x97K/6ervksw8xygVOiiKMMZT1f0FQ4CRZGpipHpFDkJJi4MymefAm sqGjlQmP9BQ9b5G2yS7/q42GSHeFkP8u1+vUP4OOT4zSIimNHO5bgDrleAbygixOYCTk muICGjemoU9LsnwTYZZamz5EIVQ0Vi/Vv/l5cEfnmvsWXg2aSGzIG8MrZ6r8R7vKY2JT S/zw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=iUu5Sks+lesdCJrNyZaS9DHfOWOugsX0eiDFqtDVzjY=; b=avFa00yI0ZLOS2q9NZAw1UA+XoI3DjVA9jl9E459j6v4dkb7VE9VkL/hF4GzPYOP4g 09lX8XP6fbDWmVB6SFaGQdWsqD8544e6wdv1UyM8xOfL7EMPE5v+wwkBbKRaXDB+C4Nv s45RhMJLieFU52yty2kD8fLwBI+15T9eEFJb4FyHR+4ZY2CGcSki04Rm5pn2JjrTNr7l pUf6Xw95wa8OUMbaDHXY1zh2huEXG2O9bks/NisnMm7Hk2vBel0gcrq3zUHxS7t999JC h5UBKXYvnjM04sIMMT0DXIqVr8GQXRMXKSJO2scH/DxkqrPfOEtMWTo63Y7xUyZS5PR3 A8eA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AHQUAuaYuUY3tXw9nM+23fKQUp8VZPc3YeM7eUo3yyvW45Ancsiri/Vp 3oo7Nl63+6FtL8gjXsMivGg=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AHgI3IYYgjcpTPMEDl9RT0WL/NKbl+T7WCqtLoi9qf0IJS+iYumpHmzFbOVQSwuG71632+zevuSpwQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a9d:80e:: with SMTP id 14mr2540054oty.108.1551126809333; Mon, 25 Feb 2019 12:33:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?IPv6:2600:8802:5600:164::100b? ([2600:8802:5600:164::100b]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 187sm4503646oid.22.2019.02.25.12.33.27 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 25 Feb 2019 12:33:28 -0800 (PST)
From: Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <9DE19647-BA11-4ACD-B57B-FE49D760F255@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_6DEA013D-E9B8-4684-B953-50EC8A256C9B"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.2\))
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2019 12:33:25 -0800
In-Reply-To: <8EB337F5-D68B-4160-A26C-E8C7693E13F2@gmail.com>
Cc: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>, Working Group Chairs <wgchairs@ietf.org>, IETF <ietf@ietf.org>, recentattendees@ietf.org, 104all@ietf.org
To: Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>
References: <155089851917.5347.209761560453230605.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <23D062E4-4464-48C2-9464-61697C2351D6@cooperw.in> <A7B3EF23-DE19-4330-A660-D27744B95A34@gmail.com> <3a201a22-6ed2-ab83-5205-a28af7ba49d7@labn.net> <ea13d9b6-78bb-8067-d8f2-a7b98c5de307@pi.nu> <EE41BDFB-ED4E-4944-9E87-5E56766FAE37@cooperw.in> <8EB337F5-D68B-4160-A26C-E8C7693E13F2@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.2)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/recentattendees/jiyQ66b-TXWpDtwlo8hgM2wYtnc>
Subject: Re: [Recentattendees] [104all] Further Clarification Re: IETF 104 Preliminary Agenda
X-BeenThere: recentattendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Recent IETF Attendees <recentattendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/recentattendees>, <mailto:recentattendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/recentattendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:recentattendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:recentattendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/recentattendees>, <mailto:recentattendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2019 20:33:32 -0000


> On Feb 24, 2019, at 11:34 PM, Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>; wrote:
> 
> A better approach might be to ask people at registration what sessions they needed to attend.

An even better approach, although it delays feedback by one meeting, would be to look into the IETFers Application data. People list what they want to attend for the purpose of calendar maintenance. That would inform the next meeting's agenda development.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The fact that there is a highway to hell and a stairway to heaven is an interesting comment on projected traffic volume...