Re: [recipe] Application layer

Tom Herbst <tomherbst@yahoo.com> Fri, 12 February 2010 08:24 UTC

Return-Path: <tomherbst@yahoo.com>
X-Original-To: recipe@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: recipe@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB54A3A7654 for <recipe@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Feb 2010 00:24:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UpMXFXQEJveu for <recipe@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Feb 2010 00:24:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from web51302.mail.re2.yahoo.com (web51302.mail.re2.yahoo.com [206.190.38.168]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id E5E4B3A682F for <recipe@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Feb 2010 00:24:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 90850 invoked by uid 60001); 12 Feb 2010 08:25:36 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1265963135; bh=xASL2QlSI8RT1+baoHjw2Ddywj7a5XtWhcXlHu9nPF4=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=CTmfUYsJCC1VK33hBAQT5cnxBiLJZABB+1n4IOiGD5qd5+EqmS7/2OLPiUem4jKRmkfziwgB9+3QGUgGwixpJRtgAVncfcLXK+hsh96Sm+vOB6xJb6kbxKfi5Oum34laIbxk/4TiWihcBHMcN5jnQrycJG0WP0FRG2wch1QfqNU=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=11SOL/BD/SG3kelwjEJInKci/g9DDHDeuDgaqdIPwqRWreDUaNpWim43lGc4Gn/hlkQae+47Oc7COotGXqMjZVSoLWPyGcPj+SCKXRhgrdBcBWlTwesg+tiy8zoBTTMzwUYtM7vTxUtX3f2XFKzoamiko56VzDDj8pSIVWsdI/Y=;
Message-ID: <968747.90846.qm@web51302.mail.re2.yahoo.com>
X-YMail-OSG: RzMDqv0VM1lzszCEarkjKcnWszOe8kQlo6HvRWm72kbNMv91X0xtyfATbfh7_QHKOjOJQwTDFLjVDfjk9kZlvuBy.FgG1Y1ntUyMespj0dJEvNCdXiqwspEd_zTF.QIt74GqVrZoOyNCDlh9QCRpfPjVkNQdSPjXvrs3hv2GE.NY0xR7OuG4bFyKRK0iiOQZiNczQyfRAkl0yg0lfXilYjrObBPqU69v1gUsgeeNlezQ6NMvGcyCr2NNVavLdfpCB32TlXGZMMFhwoNFXE3nuQIOd7nY57r_vg2IWJEs_mKtUgbWn92bBT_sbSOEz9NgznSHD73YHO1AsLqLTik.VZoemg--
Received: from [67.188.116.191] by web51302.mail.re2.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 12 Feb 2010 00:25:35 PST
X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/9.1.10 YahooMailWebService/0.8.100.260964
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2010 00:25:35 -0800 (PST)
From: Tom Herbst <tomherbst@yahoo.com>
To: recipe@ietf.org, Henning Schulzrinne <hgs@cs.columbia.edu>
In-Reply-To: <C2AFA516-0CBE-4326-8004-C0129AD03CDE@cs.columbia.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Subject: Re: [recipe] Application layer
X-BeenThere: recipe@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "RECIPE \(Reducing Energy Consumption with Internet Protocols Exploration\)" <recipe.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/recipe>, <mailto:recipe-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/recipe>
List-Post: <mailto:recipe@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:recipe-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/recipe>, <mailto:recipe-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2010 08:24:21 -0000

Not sure I understand Zigbee vs v6/lowpan since all of the
work being done on Smart Energy 2.0 is v6/6lowpan and 
either tcp/http or COAP provided RESTful api.

Several of the people defining this will be in Anaheim. 

tom

--- On Thu, 2/11/10, Henning Schulzrinne <hgs@cs.columbia.edu>; wrote:

> From: Henning Schulzrinne <hgs@cs.columbia.edu>;
> Subject: [recipe] Application layer
> To: recipe@ietf.org
> Date: Thursday, February 11, 2010, 7:55 PM
> Bruce Nordman and I have been
> discussing whether we should re-convene a Bar BOF in
> Anaheim, focusing on topics beyond the usual Zigbee-vs.-IPv6
> or LowPAN discussions. In particular, I think that the
> current stovepipe application layers (e.g., in BACS and the
> other control-oriented building networks) are not very
> helpful as a long-term architecture. We also might want to
> think about the interfaces that need to be exposed - we
> don't want our architecture to look like the 3GPP diagram...
> (If you've taken a look at the NIST interface diagram for
> the smart grid, this comparison is not purely theoretical,
> although obviously the protocols are completely different.)
> 
> Does this sound like something of interest?
> 
> (There is some work in the SIP Forum context, but this is
> not [just] about a particular protocol.)
> 
> Henning
> _______________________________________________
> recipe mailing list
> recipe@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/recipe
>