Re: [recipe] Application layer

Not sure I understand Zigbee vs v6/lowpan since all of the
work being done on Smart Energy 2.0 is v6/6lowpan and 
either tcp/http or COAP provided RESTful api.

Several of the people defining this will be in Anaheim. 

tom

--- On Thu, 2/11/10, Henning Schulzrinne <hgs@cs.columbia.edu> wrote:

> From: Henning Schulzrinne <hgs@cs.columbia.edu>
> Subject: [recipe] Application layer
> To: recipe@ietf.org
> Date: Thursday, February 11, 2010, 7:55 PM
> Bruce Nordman and I have been
> discussing whether we should re-convene a Bar BOF in
> Anaheim, focusing on topics beyond the usual Zigbee-vs.-IPv6
> or LowPAN discussions. In particular, I think that the
> current stovepipe application layers (e.g., in BACS and the
> other control-oriented building networks) are not very
> helpful as a long-term architecture. We also might want to
> think about the interfaces that need to be exposed - we
> don't want our architecture to look like the 3GPP diagram...
> (If you've taken a look at the NIST interface diagram for
> the smart grid, this comparison is not purely theoretical,
> although obviously the protocols are completely different.)
> 
> Does this sound like something of interest?
> 
> (There is some work in the SIP Forum context, but this is
> not [just] about a particular protocol.)
> 
> Henning
> _______________________________________________
> recipe mailing list
> recipe@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/recipe
> 