Re: [recipe] [EERG] Why not using the IETF RECIPE mailing list?

JinHyeock Choi <jinchoe@gmail.com> Sat, 16 July 2011 15:01 UTC

Return-Path: <jinchoe@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: recipe@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: recipe@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58B1421F84DA for <recipe@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 16 Jul 2011 08:01:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.766
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.766 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.833, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZaknHbS0wH0t for <recipe@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 16 Jul 2011 08:01:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pz0-f52.google.com (mail-pz0-f52.google.com [209.85.210.52]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C89421F84CF for <recipe@ietf.org>; Sat, 16 Jul 2011 08:01:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by pzd13 with SMTP id 13so2939046pzd.39 for <recipe@ietf.org>; Sat, 16 Jul 2011 08:01:08 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=oaKN9SqCBhYZXDNN25wnz96Q79U6p3/vP36cf2DylHI=; b=iYr03HpNQu1EJEevvf7xbuUDdAReDqNU2T64AMrr9pPwl4p1PgnIXbM0+h1wDQj+E6 QcUctYdafCp8BE77FzFWC4om3Os/fPx8DjUwOKWxNBCOjOWLsyPHd9zGC7GNA+I/i+cI zWmR10/i7fGXvJde5J6po63YHd0/VBKYyY8EY=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.68.40.232 with SMTP id a8mr6029485pbl.84.1310828468063; Sat, 16 Jul 2011 08:01:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.68.63.230 with HTTP; Sat, 16 Jul 2011 08:01:08 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <5D4DA9AB-BF57-4780-880F-E0F2DAFFB98A@gmx.net>
References: <5D4DA9AB-BF57-4780-880F-E0F2DAFFB98A@gmx.net>
Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2011 00:01:08 +0900
Message-ID: <CAOqz15q-WmEjqinPHbhKwp5mh1OoKc7_X1kk3QVx9XY9v9fiXQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: JinHyeock Choi <jinchoe@gmail.com>
To: eerg@listserv.netlab.nec.de, Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>, hannes.tschofenig@siemens.com, recipe@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Subject: Re: [recipe] [EERG] Why not using the IETF RECIPE mailing list?
X-BeenThere: recipe@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "RECIPE \(Reducing Energy Consumption with Internet Protocols Exploration\)" <recipe.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/recipe>, <mailto:recipe-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/recipe>
List-Post: <mailto:recipe@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:recipe-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/recipe>, <mailto:recipe-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2011 15:01:12 -0000

Dear Hannes

thanks for notifying RECIPE activities.

I went over its discussion archive and wonder whether
RECIPE is about Green ICT or Green by ICT or both.

As you know, there is a subtle but clear difference among them.
The first is to improve energy efficiency of ICT itself and
the second is to improve energy efficiency using ICT,
which may result in more ICT power consumption.

For EERG, currently we have in mind Green Communication,
so Green ICT.

Thanks for your kind consideration.

Best regards

JinHyeock

On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 3:21 PM, Hannes Tschofenig
<hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>; wrote:
> Hi Juergen,
> Hi all,
>
> I am wondering why a separate mailing list was established given that there is an existing one already with a similar, if not identical, scope - "Reducing Energy Consumption with Internet Protocols Exploration (RECIPE)",
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/recipe
>
> The recipe list is an IETF mailing list and the IETF IPR note well applies, which is probably a good thing to have.
>
> Ciao
> Hannes
>
> _______________________________________________
> Eerg mailing list
> Eerg@listserv.netlab.nec.de
> https://listserv.netlab.nec.de/mailman/listinfo/eerg
>