[regext] WG: draft-ietf-regext-epp-fees: add feature to inquire balance and credit limit?

"Matthias Pfeifer" <info@freshmail.de> Wed, 15 May 2019 15:15 UTC

Return-Path: <info@freshmail.de>
X-Original-To: regext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: regext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5507E120152 for <regext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 May 2019 08:15:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7aDIgpUYVXec for <regext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 May 2019 08:15:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mout.kundenserver.de (mout.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.130]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0454212011D for <regext@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 May 2019 08:15:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from MatthiasPC ([217.92.186.232]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (mreue011 [212.227.15.167]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MwfrG-1gUIfo2xnW-00yAGN for <regext@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 May 2019 17:15:46 +0200
From: Matthias Pfeifer <info@freshmail.de>
To: regext@ietf.org
References: <e5b6f4f6-96cc-eaeb-7f25-478e98cf1488@knipp.de>
In-Reply-To:
Date: Wed, 15 May 2019 17:15:31 +0200
Message-ID: <003901d50b31$09ee1a80$1dca4f80$@freshmail.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Thread-Index: AQGYBMCVX+qRDw5kOV1HWIvK28gxNAEz07j9pty54AA=
Content-Language: de
X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:iV0x+962ZxhGifoMw3SrU0+2RsSaI4vc0kb4PelLs2CqOiomwok bEyBFiWXJCHf+DTw3j7AsKa+hnP3dilWYmb4iKblUDNXPb8QeyFAT8+PvjLjZNHc3pXEeTE kqV05LDYeOaIcr4GLM0TLAqe7Ux5pkq6am0byTF9k2LOAfeEHooERnFKZwhhQfh8SdLR/75 Q+yb7cznXkg74uY17vWtQ==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:xh7Fz590ZzA=:V0qwsaQhsj1Xr9TG7sBQ+h gvQlcFVw7uvl4XqsrdhyNx9l/J8cnIXZf7BYHdiVSAeY8MyG82ZiFxxnONRvcz3r/FO+VAUiP 8l7Q94P4SCZz3UDH7f0xW19vqXtK3JUP04SalfMjl74Llbg9LbHdPRB4UKooCdPU134sADwBw 37srMOCLJ2CIYu9tBeNzmy9Suq5K3sUJiBbAJdOV+DLPjMWMpSwLLDiPOZJQ7aFdhc2XYyfM1 VvlsGrRV4C1qBf5VVJQTnup2Jb0vlYTgFTBXEVUM/y1aVvvsDN9JS8as3TMhsoZaHQHvUne+N dMcRtYGn5f6ct4TWlBSMXTosP9cCzCn92LCP3RRzVj+WqlfCcpDOJz50AKSUu4sqLAQtPJNvY P+t0PmbWByTQDBILeJjz01mc9c7aBU4WBxAsRvlR7j/q0hutStF2sqPZe3+Yy101xrgVFmmq/ 9Nm28leCsKowSnDged3Nfo5MpSPq5WxxCH+BtCGjXw2dGBzgK7xgSYvPAQNxLvGoxaKsLBUI3 /u5w3/6mV9aP4phi8y3mSL6T7tv5stnVCbu8nyks96SJZh7ICRnvc0vNyY4MGlP7ApagwDQjk GvHYdt46XUXUkVgZFX3MacvVxsdGqFWwc84HGrgnK9CNPDXTa27hoO/wPWylG6NiCqHJ97lU3 PyMtq1gL9SEndRCqRIRvpvV1AYvfJH+Omh/ViljsJx2S70888blymGTTfjb0NJB2jGwDKFnd8 vU4CfiAiU5vMGBY6ZrqTc6qYneGQ48lFCxtcoOouqT2q1YlAGUL1qUlM9m8=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/regext/-ejrSw0_q1mQ7h9tH11srdR1GtE>
Subject: [regext] WG: draft-ietf-regext-epp-fees: add feature to inquire balance and credit limit?
X-BeenThere: regext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Registration Protocols Extensions <regext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/regext>, <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/regext/>
List-Post: <mailto:regext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext>, <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 May 2019 15:15:55 -0000

 
 Hello Thomas,
 
 We have technically a credits based backend with pre-payment (tldbox).
 But in fact we are doing post-payment with our Registrars by managing huge
 volumes of credits for each of them. So in our case this wouldn’t make sense
 - at least it could lead to confusion.
 
 So this should be optional.
 
 Best, Matthias
 
 
 > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> > Von: regext <regext-bounces@ietf.org> Im Auftrag von Thomas Corte
> > (TANGO support)
> > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 15. Mai 2019 16:48
> > An: regext@ietf.org
> > Cc: support@tango-rs.com
> > Betreff: [regext] draft-ietf-regext-epp-fees: add feature to inquire
> > balance and credit limit?
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > some of our registrars keep asking for a feature to simply inquire
> > their current account balance and credit limit via EPP.
> >
> > As far as I can tell, even the latest fee extension draft
> > ("draft-ietf-regext-epp-fees-16") only supports the retrieval of this
> > information in the response to a *transform* command, but not e.g. in
> > a check response.
> >
> > This isn't ideal since the registrar should not be forced to send a "dummy"
> > sequence of billable commands (e.g., a domain create/delete or
> > transfer request/cancel sequence) only to get this information.
> > Also, even if the registrar would store the values from the most
> > recent "non- dummy" transform response, they could become obsolete
> > quickly due to intermittent automatic renewals, or account top-up
> deposits.
> >
> > What's the opinion in this group regarding the addition of an inquiry
> > feature, e.g. by adding a flag to the <domain:check> command fee
> > extension, which could trigger the inclusion of the balance/limit in
> > the <domain:check> fee response extension?
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
> > Thomas Corte
> >
> > --
> > TANGO REGISTRY SERVICES® is a product of:
> > Knipp Medien und Kommunikation GmbH
> > Technologiepark                             Phone: +49 231 9703-222
> > Martin-Schmeisser-Weg 9                       Fax: +49 231 9703-200
> > D-44227 Dortmund                       E-Mail: support@tango-rs.com
> > Germany
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > regext mailing list
> > regext@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext