[regext] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-regext-epp-ttl-18: (with COMMENT)

Murray Kucherawy via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Tue, 07 January 2025 14:26 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Murray Kucherawy via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <173625999902.2040311.16286639313486862730@dt-datatracker-65f549669d-2xld9>
Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2025 06:26:39 -0800
Message-ID-Hash: BBYTL3AS33Q26NDWX66OZ36PAAOWGNHQ
CC: draft-ietf-regext-epp-ttl@ietf.org, regext-chairs@ietf.org, regext@ietf.org, andy@hxr.us
Reply-To: Murray Kucherawy <superuser@gmail.com>
Subject: [regext] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-regext-epp-ttl-18: (with COMMENT)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/regext/3mAwSZGEOOUqsqczy3MyRH69u_E>

Murray Kucherawy has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-regext-epp-ttl-18: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-epp-ttl/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thanks to Takahiro Nemoto for their ARTART review.

I support Eric's DISCUSS position.

For the SHOULDs in Section 3.2, what are the implications of deviating from
this advice?  Is there ever a legitimate reason to do so?

Thank you for including Section 9.

[regext] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft… Murray Kucherawy via Datatracker