[regext] Re: WGLC: draft-ietf-regext-epp-delete-bcp-03

["[e-mail]" <[e-mail]>]

Hi Scott,

Splitting Section 5 into "Current Practices" and "Proposed experimental 
Practices" would offer a lot of more clarity in this respect.

Also abstract is not mentioning proposed practices:

"This document describes best practices to delete domain and host 
objects that reduce the risk of DNS resolution failure and maintain 
client-server data consistency."

I would change to:
"This document describes best current practices as well as proposes new 
experimental practices to delete domain and host objects that reduce the 
risk of DNS resolution failure and maintain client-server data consistency.

Kind Regards,

Pawel

On 18.06.24 17:46, Hollenbeck, Scott wrote:
> Pawel, the document already describes known practices, their issues, and those that are proposed, along with analysis of how they're thought to be better. What's missing?
>
> Scott
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [e-mail] <[e-mail]>
>> Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2024 11:36 AM
>> To: [e-mail]
>> Subject: [EXTERNAL] [regext] Re: WGLC: draft-ietf-regext-epp-delete-bcp-03
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> In the course of the actual discussion on the clarity of documents we produce,
>> especially related to implementation maturity of the solutions I would need to
>> repeat the remark I brought up during the call for adoption [1].
>>
>> I think the document, being a BCP, should be very specific about which
>> methods have already been field proven and which are kind of experimental
>> with unknown implementation or operational impact.
>>
>> [1]
>> https://secure-web.cisco.com/1WmRFtKB8RXzAHuXHoN-OpHA3vOlG-
>> G0Gpki1ow4L_ezX0s3WaHnOjI1vjfr3mJJj49Wx2QArJxHz_7WstL3WUkGvQXd
>> O_QI2Mxh_wKKA9UvoWj_UJUlybSsh9WVIQK4h2Hcc-
>> LRehJ7_1E2xmP1iH5FpdEdMxrN2CGNIlFnFVDNyoiPSKZ_xANApbBjCnW1gXU
>> pEpbFO4TVSXTFbYeTzWmJT3PHkqzw4dmncdVrCbGbV8b99WCfG2c-
>> ahrgqfi1TBuravVfcBrC61Q9oNp2QGP5FzDQ9hbP2gAR93uA0CSo/https%3A
>> %2F%2Fmailarchive.ietf.org%2Farch%2Fmsg%2Fregext%2FlDkYhEak6_JehglG
>> -YuqxBpwgrw%2F
>>
>> Kind Regards,
>>
>> Pawel
>>
>> On 03.06.24 16:56, James Galvin wrote:
>>> The document editors have indicated that the following document is ready
>> for submission to the IESG to be considered for publication as a Best Current
>> Practice:
>>> Best Practices for Deletion of Domain and Host Objects in the
>>> Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP)
>>> https://secure-
>> web.cisco.com/1kPqjqwCJfsCxQHvBeBU74pCSqzTWdJQ6jZ6RQm7-
>> 2mcVf8pmghWjgEJRqVdkFppbs7M_HiHAE7CVQJzMEmDrBQgrLJGI5WUGwC
>> 1rsVWeoAzVgC
>> MgBrz_tOOZZ_yWsmaNrvKsCiYCAcKk34iXfGeMuD9YljauXP4IJOs_ATrkUln1aa
>> Ezd61l
>> pawefS7VAbs77M4BMKMb1NWfX_heCB1wqcD1HYXnSkD203cWebWfQKgj
>> 5C8DWHYMuKHwud
>> dFtPJJaxGWQA_qb0xjiiL9S3sLb2CbefBMEsC2aAwis4YLx2E/https%3A%2F%2F
>> datatr
>>> acker.ietf.org%2Fdoc%2Fdraft-ietf-regext-epp-delete-bcp%2F03%2F
>>>
>>> Please indicate your support or no objection for the publication of this
>> document by replying to this message on list (a simple “+1” is sufficient).
>>> If any working group member has questions regarding the publication of this
>> document please respond on the list with your concerns by close of business
>> everywhere, Monday, 17 June 2024.
>>> If there are no objections the document will be submitted to the IESG.
>>>
>>> The Document Shepherd for this document is Andy Newton.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Antoin and Jim
>>> REGEXT WG Co-Chairs
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> regext mailing list -- [e-mail] To unsubscribe send an email to
>>> [e-mail]