Re: [regext] rfc7484bis

Marc Blanchet <marc.blanchet@viagenie.ca> Tue, 11 August 2020 18:29 UTC

Return-Path: <marc.blanchet@viagenie.ca>
X-Original-To: regext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: regext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E2413A09FC for <regext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 11:29:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.888
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.888 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=viagenie-ca.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id K9VvSvmX1TL3 for <regext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 11:29:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt1-x82b.google.com (mail-qt1-x82b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::82b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 892E23A09B4 for <regext@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 11:29:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt1-x82b.google.com with SMTP id e5so10176906qth.5 for <regext@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 11:29:53 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=viagenie-ca.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=I6UZaYiLNnzCae4/ZjC7q2xln1grlyxHNycJMrBPjp8=; b=zWaPJbkO2FuW+HH4yTXLdG8JbpF1J009oQKdz4Q/Ko8iuxO99Rt51mcNpnxjO45gz7 ZsjLG+Ahs8ooxWXL82/hiVBoOHo/iIgq2WEww1c83YM6p3Z0wmYq4wy22anQZTX/+y6q UKFB0NK2Ly5EGAkexuJrNw+iXTYGh4bxs7VD8hrDmyI5uZ8wzmBeztBy2hWS8CbOnVhg Dd09bUDrI+zN4TNnFeQ4BsY1GgnIDTFdtQP1G9nGBT4soees2/x1sTR/JJuUluWF7r4W QGqwXwG34oW+3ovQj78rVDRKJZDheBL/wYFAyWShh5hTZryQ3i+IXHhNcbsLw9uErj36 uDjQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=I6UZaYiLNnzCae4/ZjC7q2xln1grlyxHNycJMrBPjp8=; b=deo0i8+qyqspw2KQHtkISrJaO9Ah4EeWxpO6rXeIWYh2KwRrebN0snf6cuyl8TEfo6 i3bprBaJ1K12uf304R5rQTzSr7iFO/ROUbagNi66mCQmScJd2XNdAyZKZD8PgqnlA5DR k4F+k73ecjO4guU5KizVPUUZ606k+GVmM4+n0IafTKX9/cPFzY6dr4v8DveP8gCP7Pyy 2LcXJPUQioU6fLsIvvzHN6EpWUHsTXhGVZSCwDHr+GMuxJaOb1fYv+pw+lmzOrBqeEhC SIq+UgyuA6jDmGBua27oAv52oL+WDP1zv2QxkcySZmYtMRWZuAzQ82CsvBnyUPlHfL4X W7ew==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533Wwcc5KHGW2Rrs5WLzohXGaCEfHk4OV8xNZXOoPs5e7MXh/klW G+uE64iFlJlOHNdKybZksVkXnQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzj2R8vkO6MQ46lP4hXiBr36vXfYB2NhI/t/oHJM1RHHYXes2sI2t6o7Bum4C8ANUM/m27Xog==
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:6782:: with SMTP id b2mr2463821qtp.152.1597170592431; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 11:29:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.60] (modemcable138.218-70-69.static.videotron.ca. [69.70.218.138]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 65sm19527801qkf.33.2020.08.11.11.29.51 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 11 Aug 2020 11:29:51 -0700 (PDT)
From: "Marc Blanchet" <marc.blanchet@viagenie.ca>
To: "Patrick Mevzek" <pm@dotandco.com>
Cc: regext@ietf.org
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2020 14:29:50 -0400
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.13.1r5671)
Message-ID: <24FF3F3C-D5B6-485B-8741-8D931203617D@viagenie.ca>
In-Reply-To: <b462d05a-4739-46c1-91e2-09c3b6533f64@www.fastmail.com>
References: <2F82ED17-8312-4E70-B18B-C51B2BDCFD97@viagenie.ca> <b462d05a-4739-46c1-91e2-09c3b6533f64@www.fastmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed; markup=markdown
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/regext/5UC1XJg2cJu1_-Lrr5ibkHomcc0>
Subject: Re: [regext] rfc7484bis
X-BeenThere: regext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Registration Protocols Extensions <regext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/regext>, <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/regext/>
List-Post: <mailto:regext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext>, <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2020 18:29:56 -0000

On 4 Aug 2020, at 12:47, Patrick Mevzek wrote:

> On Tue, Aug 4, 2020, at 08:46, Marc Blanchet wrote:
>>   if anyone has a something to raise for RFC7484, please send me 
>> email
>> asap.
>
> Hello Marc,
> Also about:
> "
>    Because these registries will be accessed by software, the download
>    demand for the RDAP Bootstrap Services Registries may be unusually
>    high compared to normal IANA registries.  The technical
>    infrastructure by which registries are published will need to be
>    reviewed and might need to be augmented.
> "
>
> 5 years after the first RFC, maybe it would be useful/interesting to 
> get some
> statistics from IANA about this or even their feelings on that for the 
> future.

I’ve got word from IANA management some time ago that there were no 
issues regarding these registries or the volume. However, I don’t have 
statistics. And they said that they had no comment on a possible bis 
version.

>
> For example, I do have witnessed some changes at some point, like 
> downloads without
> a User-Agent are prohibited now if I recall correctly.

I don’t have any data. Will ask. To my understanding, this registry is 
served by a contracted CDN. So it might be a change in policy by the 
CDN.

Marc.

>
> -- 
>   Patrick Mevzek
>   pm@dotandco.com