[regext] Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-regext-rdap-extensions-02.txt

["Hollenbeck, Scott" <[e-mail]>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrew Newton (andy) <[e-mail]>
> Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2024 8:27 AM
> To: [e-mail]
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] [regext] Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-regext-rdap-
> extensions-02.txt
> 
> Caution: This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click links
> or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is
> safe.
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> This new version of the draft has a couple of new sections.
> 
> Two of the new sections call for the addition of more expert reviewers for the
> IANA RDAP registries and for the reviewers to check each others work.
> 
> And the other two sections regard security considerations and privacy
> considerations.
> 
> Let us know what you think.

[SAH] Andy, I'd very much prefer that we discuss changes like this BEFORE they appear in a working group draft. I don't necessarily disagree with the suggestions, but if we assume that a working group draft is a reflection of working group consensus it makes more sense to discuss significant change proposals on this mailing list before they're committed to the draft. Now I have to read it very carefully to make sure I don't miss something important... 😊

Some of what the draft proposes requires updates to RFCs 9082 and 9083. They're full standards. Doesn't that raise a process question that we need to discuss?

I do like the idea of adding additional reviewers and guidance for their responsibilities. I'll share more feedback after I re-read it all again, this time very carefully.

Scott