IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [regext] status of draft-ietf-regext-rdap-reverse-search

Jasdip Singh <jasdips@arin.net> Thu, 01 September 2022 13:43 UTC

Return-Path: <jasdips@arin.net>
X-Original-To: regext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: regext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04216C152594 for <regext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Sep 2022 06:43:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.906
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.906 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5-PbG0y1Wnq1 for <regext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Sep 2022 06:43:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp3.arin.net (smtp3.arin.net [IPv6:2001:500:4:201::53]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EE3FCC15259D for <regext@ietf.org>; Thu, 1 Sep 2022 06:43:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from CAS01CHA.corp.arin.net (cas01cha.corp.arin.net [10.1.30.62]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp3.arin.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E98141074723; Thu, 1 Sep 2022 09:43:18 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from CAS01CHA.corp.arin.net (10.1.30.62) by CAS01CHA.corp.arin.net (10.1.30.62) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Thu, 1 Sep 2022 09:43:18 -0400
Received: from CAS01CHA.corp.arin.net ([fe80::99af:898b:219f:401]) by CAS01CHA.corp.arin.net ([fe80::99af:898b:219f:401%17]) with mapi id 15.00.1497.000; Thu, 1 Sep 2022 09:43:18 -0400
From: Jasdip Singh <jasdips@arin.net>
To: James Galvin <galvin@elistx.com>, REGEXT WG <regext@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [regext] status of draft-ietf-regext-rdap-reverse-search
Thread-Index: AQHYu62rn0tsjWRZN0Sf5texnHprPK3KmjmA
Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2022 13:43:17 +0000
Message-ID: <55741403-146A-4924-8BFD-F192B497BBB4@arin.net>
References: <DE3DF65A-F1DE-4B7F-A30A-C4DF19FE604D@elistx.com>
In-Reply-To: <DE3DF65A-F1DE-4B7F-A30A-C4DF19FE604D@elistx.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [192.136.136.37]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <CE7ED616CF8A7B4C9670940590E20E4B@corp.arin.net>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/regext/6ROBdNsSzByrFpGeNjQPOYNfyrI>
Subject: Re: [regext] status of draft-ietf-regext-rdap-reverse-search
X-BeenThere: regext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Registration Protocols Extensions <regext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/regext>, <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/regext/>
List-Post: <mailto:regext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext>, <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2022 13:43:34 -0000

Hi.

+1 for input addressed.

Thanks,
Jasdip

On 8/29/22, 9:45 AM, "regext on behalf of James Galvin" <regext-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of galvin@elistx.com> wrote:

    Mario Loffredo has asked for WGLC for the RDAP reverse search document:

    https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-rdap-reverse-search/

    This document had a WGLC about 6 months ago that resulted in quite some extended discussion, and as a result it did not pass WGLC.

    Mario has produced a revised document but there has not been any discussion on the list about these changes.

    The Chairs would like for those who had concerns the last time to indicate on the list that their concerns have been addressed before we start another WGLC on this document.

    Please, if you had questions last time, indicate if your questions have been answered in the latest version of the document.

    The Chairs must see this before we can start a WGLC.

    Thanks,

    Antoin and Jim

    _______________________________________________
    regext mailing list
    regext@ietf.org
    https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email