Re: [regext] Security Lock anyone? (Was: Preliminary agenda for Prague, and call for agenda items)

Kal Feher <ietf@feherfamily.org> Mon, 04 March 2019 12:30 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf@feherfamily.org>
X-Original-To: regext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: regext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 705FB13105F for <regext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Mar 2019 04:30:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PeApoaynY1cU for <regext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Mar 2019 04:30:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from indigo.securenic.net (li90-55.members.linode.com [74.207.248.55]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD6F213107F for <regext@ietf.org>; Mon, 4 Mar 2019 04:30:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by indigo.securenic.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 598DF67013 for <regext@ietf.org>; Mon, 4 Mar 2019 23:30:05 +1100 (AEDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at securenic.net
Received: from indigo.securenic.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (indigo.securenic.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LzRXKpRr0fnm for <regext@ietf.org>; Mon, 4 Mar 2019 23:30:04 +1100 (AEDT)
Received: from Brussels.local (c49-177-68-250.eburwd8.vic.optusnet.com.au [49.177.68.250]) by indigo.securenic.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 345E767007 for <regext@ietf.org>; Mon, 4 Mar 2019 23:30:04 +1100 (AEDT)
To: regext@ietf.org
References: <19F54F2956911544A32543B8A9BDE0759FBF8765@NICS-EXCH2.sbg.nic.at> <8175501f-3365-c8d1-7a76-a4584e76734e@centralnic.com> <C4A68CA3-1ADE-4959-A51E-A73F4A4914DC@sidn.nl> <395DD26B-B2D1-4144-87BD-8DBCD772A8A5@lansing.dk> <34c35e4c575a4e338215b919c102cdfc@cira.ca> <2BE5D16A-F8A6-4609-9420-19BA1CE89185@nic.br> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1902261744450.19193@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk> <CAHXf=0rcJD_CQQ5WhLPhC_AtqXqMkZDdxpZAMjBfx1KRsSErGQ@mail.gmail.com> <CADyWQ+HqGBDSk4EwcSi=gq1VXmAEwK7eP=aYaeLVndfwao2h7A@mail.gmail.com>
From: Kal Feher <ietf@feherfamily.org>
Openpgp: preference=signencrypt
Autocrypt: addr=ietf@feherfamily.org; keydata= mQENBFtz9XEBCAD2uTgg4OvehOlyellLS2prQpjmrMP6eck6Ow40GNZrqsM9XTCF1KRh1XmE qHHSEswbyoHia6mYfXrG/5lHjeisgVK6cqw2CpzyR+i/PhFbqjtiEQsWuiKa72hcW6J95TNL XEBvbcNHIkl1VOCbfKuMhqbtqoEfUWlsPdM/W5Vk/6OboY81VIPxpIws5Db8TIODjBEcKmhe BmkoIcsztHbo+p2uM7B2kyi9MzBFVYMeGF6IQTdinCw7WCBE8Jrmx645oQ/TNGT+//WXXTrU 5wajmHdNEYWa0muT/IhKstvU6K0/fWRfwQaQ4sdKAzJ+/8xu+A7xiPYBJq/7MHcpTIUfABEB AAG0IEthbCBGZWhlciA8aWV0ZkBmZWhlcmZhbWlseS5vcmc+iQFUBBMBCAA+FiEEce3bjehV CDyQmzspY20IgJ75NrcFAltz9XICGwMFCQHhM4AFCwkIBwIGFQoJCAsCBBYCAwECHgECF4AA CgkQY20IgJ75Nrekgwf/Ubn9ADzWrkcdAx3UAbhpA0SSrnKA5KaZrzDdjQf85nUfw2hWLARs zEyhpgqcPoU6mSAcdUHcmufHPf2ovOpIzHlHNrsDmGbcU1ScLaVBrGcZJ3J9W5SbyJH5Repa bKildHVY5wn/FyB+KTBUD3pJ6VUhVqUvQhfBi3KN0moCfe77W8EpdCOifZ6m6mv8o9/xDArY xLJR9PAJto1wxMz1WznhTz5A7QiMTgHeeh5OYKz79pihUZPUCQY0oxhBDeK+bAtNl7I07vR6 XSqtM4chm6Zr4YV/QeugX8/Xj2OMxnQLqdnnwC8YhwNConEKalW7XEKb962ZS8/jbitkSaFq VbkBDQRbc/VxAQgAwwHuWHsRk+56J3XACM4H0uZsunNU+Ic1nDQ/eVSLbHoYU3slSk+TbV/Z CV+pzYAJL3aRVDUFIlpeN7M3cmx23kgtIjzL9KdbZYKJ9QdFOrGht1S/iyFApmEWHVOjPegb gnaHzLKyJJGwTofjfhoz2yQG4JidRt11yGpsJ+Yd3FR7NeQiJy8gVmzcnmqBtw18nJstrEmE tIg4QGMgvSw4SfenoQh4S/kTW3aD1fQyFVDr/dhNuWdZom6D8GeOLvcpviLnFtcPyl7w4KuQ zwZPDhDTOt4eY8VKsyPdc3o8K5oL4hIx9IUVioQglxb5SRlLm+ihhUwp78+S0PxfzjBo6wAR AQABiQE8BBgBCAAmFiEEce3bjehVCDyQmzspY20IgJ75NrcFAltz9XECGwwFCQHhM4AACgkQ Y20IgJ75NrfSIQf+KshlrOAryQNJqAb2p+9XGamIHWvk/r6KVSDx16WI3F6VxlPCvnzKcOkM Lo8yBR28065fodAK6FWiK/PGv6wSNm5rXoEdishAtn4aH36hwFsNeQ3t5zbzj8LhuP0wf/xf 1I/5rSY8YSg2eW0/dMRKA+PTjLwlj/6nbVgjf9C3p2GiAPMDl49XVGpb5G8+C0GNarl7CFZz 7T9DVbwFKaM9u/a5ZVky9wZF6HzVxTkxPse28R1XvHfAafnfj+zWfiI8q0i/ALKDUOXxBpLY BGwWeqxIsnl6C4v65nHpGjeRfWwx+Nk8T85fI7aANsbIbmwAbX/hkzRd8tLLftUa2K3gqA==
Message-ID: <ac6bcf02-1e3e-90fa-38b4-ebd5ba9527ee@feherfamily.org>
Date: Mon, 04 Mar 2019 23:30:03 +1100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.5.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CADyWQ+HqGBDSk4EwcSi=gq1VXmAEwK7eP=aYaeLVndfwao2h7A@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="tVwu1Am0F2hGgkgqZvoWV8ixB7dANaBLs"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/regext/6f8CZgMOv5zBYfpW-rsniR-jrXk>
Subject: Re: [regext] Security Lock anyone? (Was: Preliminary agenda for Prague, and call for agenda items)
X-BeenThere: regext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Registration Protocols Extensions <regext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/regext>, <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/regext/>
List-Post: <mailto:regext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext>, <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Mar 2019 12:30:07 -0000

I wont be on-site but will attend remotely if remote participation is
available.

On 4/3/19 8:32 pm, Tim Wicinski wrote:
>
> Count me in.
>
> Tim
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 4:14 AM Alexander Mayrhofer
> <alex.mayrhofer.ietf@gmail.com <mailto:alex.mayrhofer.ietf@gmail.com>>
> wrote:
>
>     I've reserved room PARIS on wednesday, 2pm for that discussion. I hope
>     that everyone can make it - this is the "unstructured time" slot on
>     Wed afternoon, and so far it does not collide with any BoFs.. If
>     there's a more convenient time, please let me know in private mail...
>     i thought a doodle would be overkill for now..
>
>     best,
>     Alex
>
>     On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 6:46 PM Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at
>     <mailto:dot@dotat.at>> wrote:
>     >
>     > Rubens Kuhl <rubensk@nic.br <mailto:rubensk@nic.br>> wrote:
>     > >
>     > > I imagine that DNS as a communication channel to assure registrant
>     > > willingness to change something, similar to CDNS/CDNSKEY,
>     could be quite
>     > > useful. For instance, if the name servers that are delegated
>     on the
>     > > registry are now pointing to new name servers, and this
>     response is
>     > > signed by the current DS/DNSKEY on the delegation, changing
>     the DNS
>     > > servers for that domain is pretty safe.
>     >
>     > There is RFC 7477 CSYNC, but I don't know of any implementations.
>     >
>     > Tony.
>     > --
>     > f.anthony.n.finch  <dot@dotat.at <mailto:dot@dotat.at>> 
>     http://dotat.at/
>     > safeguard the balance of nature and the environment
>     >
>     > _______________________________________________
>     > regext mailing list
>     > regext@ietf.org <mailto:regext@ietf.org>
>     > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     regext mailing list
>     regext@ietf.org <mailto:regext@ietf.org>
>     https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> regext mailing list
> regext@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext

-- 
Kal Feher
Melbourne, Australia