Re: [regext] draft-ietf-regext-rfc7482bis Last Call Comments Channeled from draft-blanchet-regext-rdap-deployfindings

"Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com> Tue, 08 September 2020 14:45 UTC

Return-Path: <shollenbeck@verisign.com>
X-Original-To: regext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: regext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA1CD3A0D57 for <regext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Sep 2020 07:45:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=verisign.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id e6Mnt-E3D6HE for <regext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Sep 2020 07:45:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail6.verisign.com (mail6.verisign.com [69.58.187.32]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 109893A0D2C for <regext@ietf.org>; Tue, 8 Sep 2020 07:45:27 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=verisign.com; l=2454; q=dns/txt; s=VRSN; t=1599576328; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=yE+Tvd7ea5AR5j2N/omSxEg5P4doLGKOWLOJz5F9Cvc=; b=V6JEbx7u2nhRblHm1Ok4/DA6WT1gkhuuTJGoAwpo31bllh7cxk3kKaLq /P9NaSMURbmPxbdbaKUw+tuAxnipntZ331SGQZPcvLnJl30j606x64iPq nJsIvT+/RSRPdmVXVQwlf49O3oaXYekCt85MxTDBv2/HGZb7sp9uRLFsy z00zV87y5SSPHtSBqF2+PJv7LXGwoz15VfJ2HxoId0toK+RYqFe08vIUj to5wH8GNKwCElMO7uzxQGydrE9NgnUJOQ7VkeqJxbFqV//kF4IYNGMA/c PU0FN8vU2fKrFwWfre/aArV9TeYqzZ2u0+zbjqUIzCvpRt1vPFPSYs1OE A==;
IronPort-SDR: uKBvRB6gGK27AbPB/AyZREZ36s1L5WedKV9SEkTCkLpHPULCYwBCQNRkqv7P+BGGtqvW9Vqy4z YaoN44IY+uj93hi3xog1Rxh4T+np+lFQzDhtDXAFAXmm3BiVop44+a9HV3LSkvzuxG1okfImkb jz+XzxXlRd2kAVzs4IcO+3CO09K4syaAGuS/tZ9jC/oVEO+o/Is1qcn4j7fc4n5gYQkCDmvMB1 GSH5Eo+5+MAimZObuw6QSqTqgMqt5S0o27sorIAFqzG8ARAZ2/8h9lPj5rjtqFxnRiSPEm9RlB new=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.76,406,1592884800"; d="scan'208";a="2828786"
IronPort-PHdr: =?us-ascii?q?9a23=3AIneUOB3uyHTCs26UsmDT+DRfVm0co7zxezQtwd?= =?us-ascii?q?8ZseMWLPad9pjvdHbS+e9qxAeQG9mCtbQd1rGd7fqocFdDyK7JiGoFfp1IWk?= =?us-ascii?q?1NouQttCtkPvS4D1bmJuXhdS0wEZcKflZk+3amLRodQ56mNBXdrXKo8DEdBA?= =?us-ascii?q?j0OxZrKeTpAI7SiNm82/yv95HJbAhEmTuwbalvIBi2owjducgbjZV/Iast1x?= =?us-ascii?q?XFpWdFdf5Lzm1yP1KTmBj85sa0/JF99ilbpuws+c1dX6jkZqo0VbNXAigoPG?= =?us-ascii?q?Az/83rqALMTRCT6XsGU2UZiQRHDg7Y5xznRJjxsy/6tu1g2CmGOMD9UL45VS?= =?us-ascii?q?i+46ptVRTljjoMOTwk/2HNksF+jLxVrg+9pxJxwIDUboOaNPtica3SctwXXn?= =?us-ascii?q?ZBXt9TVyBdHo+wc5UDAuwcNuhYtYn9oF4OoAOwCQeuA+PvzjtIiWHw3aIhze?= =?us-ascii?q?suDQLG0BQ9FNwTrHvUq8n1NLscXeuoy6TI1jXDb/RS2Tf59ofIdAsuru+QUr?= =?us-ascii?q?JzasfR11cgFxnEjlWLqIzlMDWV2v4RvGic6uptTOSigHMopA9tuDag3Nssip?= =?us-ascii?q?XXiYIPzFDJ7Th0zYY1KNCkVkN2Y8OpHZ9fuiyHOIV6XscvT311tComxLAIt4?= =?us-ascii?q?O2cSsFxZg72xLRa/yJf5SG7B/hWuicPzN1iW5jdbmihBiy6VCtxvDgWsWuzV?= =?us-ascii?q?pHrCRInsPRun0N2RHf8MeKR/9l8ku8xTqDzR3f5+NYLUwuiKbWJJ0szqQtmp?= =?us-ascii?q?cQt0nIAzX4l1/sjKCMc0Up4u2o6+P6bbr4vpKcLIp0ih3mMqQph8y/Hfw0Mg?= =?us-ascii?q?gQUGif/uSxzKDu81HhTrlXjvI4iqbXv5HGKcgFvKK5HRNa0oE56xanFTupys?= =?us-ascii?q?kXkWMZLFJfYxKHiZLlNE3JIPD9Ffu/glKsnyl3x/3eI7HtHo/BImXBnbrvZ7?= =?us-ascii?q?px9k5RxQQpwd1Q459YErQBL+jyWk/1utzYFBg5Mwmszub8CNV90YceWWaRDa?= =?us-ascii?q?+fK6zdr0OH5uE0LumSeoAVojf9K+Mk5/7hi381g0MSfa6s3ZcPcnC3AuxmI1?= =?us-ascii?q?mFYXrrmtoBC3kFvgUgQ+3llF2PSj9TaGiuX6Iy/D07D5imDYiQDryq1fab0S?= =?us-ascii?q?i2DoF+Z21aBBaLC3iiP9GeVvgBeD66I8J9nHoDT7f3GKE70hT7/i/9z75qKO?= =?us-ascii?q?DZ8S5c/ano08RpraWHjhE18Th5Cc6Q2GKlUWxun3gJSDlw16d69x8ugmyf2L?= =?us-ascii?q?R11qQLXedY4OlEB183?=
X-IPAS-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A2E5BAB6mFdf/zGZrQpfHQEBAQEJARIBBQUBQIFPhE4Kl?= =?us-ascii?q?WmcHAsBAQEBAQEBAQEHAS8EAQGESwKCEyU4EwIDAQELAQEBBQEBAQEBBgMBA?= =?us-ascii?q?QEChkYLgjcig3IBAQEBAx0dSwQCAQgRBAEBHwULMh0IAQEEEwi4BHSBNIpFg?= =?us-ascii?q?TiNRYFCPoERgxA+ijQEtmoDB4JlmikqgwmdTY4DhE6BbZ1qAgQCBAUCFYFrg?= =?us-ascii?q?XtwgzlQFwINjlaOEHQ3AgYKAQEDCY1lgREBAQ?=
Received: from BRN1WNEX02.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com (10.173.153.49) by BRN1WNEX02.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com (10.173.153.49) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1979.3; Tue, 8 Sep 2020 10:45:26 -0400
Received: from BRN1WNEX02.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com ([fe80::7c0a:1cc:5def:9dde]) by BRN1WNEX02.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com ([fe80::7c0a:1cc:5def:9dde%4]) with mapi id 15.01.1979.003; Tue, 8 Sep 2020 10:45:26 -0400
From: "Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>
To: "regext@ietf.org" <regext@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: draft-ietf-regext-rfc7482bis Last Call Comments Channeled from draft-blanchet-regext-rdap-deployfindings
Thread-Index: AdZ1aWYqsij1hyFNQTasNAb2smpjcgQhPc7g
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2020 14:45:26 +0000
Message-ID: <4aa2999cb0a04606b65892ec4745d343@verisign.com>
References: <6168e0bea0804678bb77d210be1515e2@verisign.com>
In-Reply-To: <6168e0bea0804678bb77d210be1515e2@verisign.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.170.148.18]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/regext/6kvI1hjqLem7DHPT2ffvHaJETDY>
Subject: Re: [regext] draft-ietf-regext-rfc7482bis Last Call Comments Channeled from draft-blanchet-regext-rdap-deployfindings
X-BeenThere: regext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Registration Protocols Extensions <regext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/regext>, <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/regext/>
List-Post: <mailto:regext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext>, <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2020 14:45:30 -0000

> -----Original Message-----
> From: regext <regext-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Hollenbeck, Scott
> Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2020 10:13 AM
> To: regext@ietf.org
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] [regext] draft-ietf-regext-rfc7482bis Last Call Comments
> Channeled from draft-blanchet-regext-rdap-deployfindings
> 
> Marc Blanchet recently asked me if I had reviewed draft-blanchet-regext-
> rdap-deployfindings as I edited the 7482bis and 7483bis documents. I missed
> that, so I thought I'd do it in the context of the working group last call for the
> two documents. Here's my summary for draft-ietf-regext-rfc7482bis:
> 
> There are two sections in draft-blanchet-regext-rdap-deployfindings that talk
> about RFC 7482: 4.1 (percent encoding of the ":" character in IPv6 addresses)
> and 6.1 (search patterns). 7482bis notes that the structure of the IP address
> formats are described in Section 3.2.2 of RFC 3986, so I think the document is
> fine with respect to acceptable formats. For what it's worth, 3986 explicitly
> notes that "URI producing applications must not use percent-encoding in
> host unless it is used to represent a UTF-8 character sequence". I interpret
> this to mean "RDAP queries MUST NOT include percent-encoded ":"
> characters in IPv6 addresses". That's probably worth talking about is some
> other place if there are clients sending such queries as reported by Marc.
> 
> Section 6.1 describes an issue with a confusing use of the term "search
> pattern" for an IP address query term that isn't really a search pattern. That
> should be fixed as follows:
> 
> OLD:
> "ZZZZ is a search pattern representing an IPv4"
> "Syntax: domains?nsIp=<domain search pattern>"
> "YYYY is a search pattern representing an IPv4"
> "Syntax: nameservers?ip=<nameserver search pattern>
> 
> NEW:
> "ZZZZ is an IPv4"
> "Syntax: domains?nsIp=<nameserver IP address>"
> "YYYY is an IPv4"
> "Syntax: nameservers?ip=<nameserver IP address>"
> 
> Is there anything here that requires additional discussion? If not, I'll make the
> changes described above. Thanks, Marc.

I just submitted an update (-02) that addresses these corrections. Note that the fixes were in Sections 3.2.1 and 3.2.2, not 6.1 as described above. With this update I believe the document is ready to start WG last call a discussed during our meeting at IETF-108.

Scott