Re: [regext] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-regext-rdap-partial-response-12
Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in> Thu, 10 September 2020 12:52 UTC
Return-Path: <alissa@cooperw.in>
X-Original-To: regext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: regext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 810E43A08B2; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 05:52:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=cooperw.in header.b=qf9eZEDf; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=rJNgetdL
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3qEfii8rzEnZ; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 05:52:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com (out5-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.29]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DC04C3A098A; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 05:52:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34B795C00BC; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 08:52:07 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 10 Sep 2020 08:52:07 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cooperw.in; h= from:message-id:content-type:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; s=fm1; bh=BkuSXEL3hgUCt2ighbBkVV+ gxqI8Bomawn71F02WEng=; b=qf9eZEDfr5ivdSDucnqf3NtJVyIE8RIb7PnSFQb RBxovTu59DDT1mIaomwHjihivXARNSxmFKcvIV/rWybLbaosMIKtqDZufsGPKZyF 3KBTvLGVXiHx7qIpiWzZ4qYxD67tWahmImbqdXyjVqpFv9LfKgfVHpSnAXpgvm5H TMhxTLuyhc4HRhkziC2r0tO204Viqy57HENrEhlScDYHnTu5VnlM7g054g343gQB BRndkYi6RtNios2SY+TgHcYbjPlIUyasaI01B7X/xhgBDutslwGa5o8I7Y7yuFD3 zp/uRwGE9REKpWP/WXd9v6q2PQYmpNNyw3p/714asYKYq5A==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=BkuSXE L3hgUCt2ighbBkVV+gxqI8Bomawn71F02WEng=; b=rJNgetdLCkEV80VWWqtoow nAHl0j4PyWzzlqRNm0pjN693ILTWlJcMrZuBQzODZbr2AxttZ7S2KqpOCoXYzYqF aw3/PupkWdz2lD6/bSCQMya/o2jRDmwzZDLp0x4BnFVQtrckMnpFgTTRLWlDnxqH R5VbCYIaFG1B1k78+VKvsAHEzOL02CadnjZ2u3kczWKJEFv3+rG5gMMOLc8nxNBT PTCl6GTbYpiqbyXsP8A/ivNA6eU+XwzMGAcjcdQlSYh0t0BvgBWexA79EH6FzT+G 9kTCJAWHCKH9ZdAyloUUOC+H0QlHDkbdj8rv6JFu6WljWlM/CJppe4h9Nq3nRY4Q ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:diFaX98v9FfH1j6CQyzeeOu0-t4kEZvELI5JeBMjLPF5OvJmw4PIAQ> <xme:diFaXxvYhKGjZKcw1fYv3ahdT0eyBZ_Q0TGUaqFovsgMeZqRcdmVzE-gvWnrDddx0 -07MFXo_xLLFHaG-w>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduiedrudehjedgheduucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhephffktgggufffjgfvfhfosegrtdhmrehhtddvnecuhfhrohhmpeetlhhishhs rgcuvehoohhpvghruceorghlihhsshgrsegtohhophgvrhifrdhinheqnecuggftrfgrth htvghrnhepuefhgfekjeetjedvtefgtdethfduveevffeuleetfeelgefghfeggfelhfeh vdeinecuffhomhgrihhnpehivghtfhdrohhrghdptghnrhdrihhtpdhhthhtphegtddtsg grughrvghquhgvshhtrhgvshhpohhnshgvtghouggvrdhnvgifpdhhthhtphegtddtsggr ughrvghquhgvshhtrhgvshhpohhnshgvtghouggvrdhishenucfkphepudejfedrfeekrd duudejrdekgeenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhr ohhmpegrlhhishhsrgestghoohhpvghrfidrihhn
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:diFaX7Cd_Llq3FkS7Ce7FkzPc9K4WzsjjG8cqWZr4J8VEvwCy2GMxw> <xmx:diFaXxewXmkS9yA3cB2n_nQF48cnTh318JA9StBksgQkdU4R9qj_iA> <xmx:diFaXyNo_XJkQIN9YiuQcX72u4eiuIVtQ6xA9MnlRyfukLQD-GlCzg> <xmx:dyFaX_rYT_4klD7FBA0ueO07xK7joyOLxSCep5HVX70ek2zW-yp7KQ>
Received: from rtp-alcoop-nitro2.cisco.com (unknown [173.38.117.84]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id E39AA3280065; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 08:52:05 -0400 (EDT)
From: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>
Message-Id: <DABDDD43-0D46-432C-A1EC-89AC29DB627E@cooperw.in>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_C073D995-E237-4B7A-BA6B-2281BBB75273"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.1\))
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2020 08:52:05 -0400
In-Reply-To: <CAPDSy+5Zh2jt7M1Uh08OzbfXf7GAt96judanj5z0N-GncBgJtA@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: Mario Loffredo <mario.loffredo@iit.cnr.it>, draft-ietf-regext-rdap-partial-response.all@ietf.org, gen-art <gen-art@ietf.org>, regext@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org
To: David Schinazi <dschinazi.ietf@gmail.com>
References: <159563087863.9898.3402105673204734293@ietfa.amsl.com> <b9c20941-1823-3bbc-02e2-9d0f7aa67d06@iit.cnr.it> <CAPDSy+5Zh2jt7M1Uh08OzbfXf7GAt96judanj5z0N-GncBgJtA@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/regext/7lJsc5qMjqF1O7VDHx3YRkv3Nf4>
Subject: Re: [regext] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-regext-rdap-partial-response-12
X-BeenThere: regext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Registration Protocols Extensions <regext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/regext>, <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/regext/>
List-Post: <mailto:regext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext>, <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2020 12:52:11 -0000
David, thanks for your review. Mario, thanks for updating the document. I entered a No Objection ballot. Alissa > On Jul 27, 2020, at 2:12 PM, David Schinazi <dschinazi.ietf@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 9:41 AM Mario Loffredo <mario.loffredo@iit.cnr.it <mailto:mario.loffredo@iit.cnr.it>> wrote: > Hi David, > > thanks a lot for your review and feedback. I provide my answer to your feedback below: > > Il 25/07/2020 00:47, David Schinazi via Datatracker ha scritto: >> Reviewer: David Schinazi >> Review result: Ready with Issues >> >> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area >> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed >> by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just >> like any other last call comments. >> >> For more information, please see the FAQ at >> <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq> <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. >> >> Document: draft-ietf-regext-rdap-partial-response-12 >> Reviewer: David Schinazi >> Review Date: 2020-07-24 >> IETF LC End Date: 2020-08-14 >> IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat >> >> Summary: Document is clear, well-written, and short. Thank you! >> >> Major issues: None >> >> Minor issues: After reading the document, I was somewhat >> confused as to the definition of fieldSet query parameter. >> I think adding a few sentences to Section 2 explaining that >> a field set is a string that the server generates which maps >> to a set of fields only known to the server would help. > [ML] It seems to me that both the concepts are already conveyed in the document. Maybe they are not adequately clarified. > > The sentence "... whose value is a string identifying a server-defined set of supported fields.." means that a field set name and the related list of fields are defined by the server. > > With regards to the assumption that a field set is known only by the server, this is not generally true. > > Both the field set names and the related list of fields might (hopefully should) be shared by as many servers as possible to facilitate interoperability as described in section 4. > > Moreover, the field sets together with other server features are expected to be described in out-of-band documents like the RDAP profile. > > Finally, as described in section 2.1, the subsetting_metadata element could provide an in-band information about the supported field sets that is more reactive to server updates than out-of-band contents. > > Do you think that the concepts above should be furtherly clarified ? > > > I would say that clarifying this would be useful, because it wasn't clear to me. > That said, I'm not very knowledgeable about RDAP so maybe I'm not the target audience. > Though since this document might need to consumed by HTTP server operators > that don't know RDAP either, perhaps a clarification is worth the effort. > > >> Additionally, specifying that the string can't be empty and >> which characters are allowed might help avoid interop >> issues down the road. >> >> Nits/editorial comments: None >> > [ML] Agreed. > > But rather than updating section 2, I think that it would be better to change the section 5 as in the following: > > OLD > > Each request including an unsupported field set SHOULD produce an > HTTP 400 (Bad Request) response code. > NEW > > Each request including either an empty or an unsupported "fieldSet" value SHOULD produce an > HTTP 400 (Bad Request) response code. > Is it okay with you? > > > Yes, this would avoid the interop problem I was worried about. > Though using the word "non-empty" in section 2 wouldn't hurt. > Also, I would personally recommend making this a MUST rather > than a SHOULD so clients can rely on that behavior. > > David > > Best, > > Mario > >> _______________________________________________ >> regext mailing list >> regext@ietf.org <mailto:regext@ietf.org> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext> > -- > Dr. Mario Loffredo > Systems and Technological Development Unit > Institute of Informatics and Telematics (IIT) > National Research Council (CNR) > via G. Moruzzi 1, I-56124 PISA, Italy > Phone: +39.0503153497 > Mobile: +39.3462122240 > Web: http://www.iit.cnr.it/mario.loffredo <http://www.iit.cnr.it/mario.loffredo>_______________________________________________ > Gen-art mailing list > Gen-art@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
- [regext] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-re… David Schinazi via Datatracker
- Re: [regext] Genart last call review of draft-iet… Barry Leiba
- Re: [regext] Genart last call review of draft-iet… Mario Loffredo
- Re: [regext] Genart last call review of draft-iet… David Schinazi
- Re: [regext] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of… Alissa Cooper