IETF Logo Mail Archive

[regext] Re: WGLC: draft-ietf-regext-epp-delete-bcp-03

kowalik@denic.de Tue, 18 June 2024 15:36 UTC

Return-Path: <kowalik@denic.de>
X-Original-To: regext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: regext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CEA8C1D5C4E for <regext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Jun 2024 08:36:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.106
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.106 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=denic.de
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id E2-IYPvO-EYB for <regext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Jun 2024 08:36:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mout-b-210.mailbox.org (mout-b-210.mailbox.org [195.10.208.40]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 13EDDC18DBBC for <regext@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Jun 2024 08:35:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp102.mailbox.org (smtp102.mailbox.org [IPv6:2001:67c:2050:b231:465::102]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mout-b-210.mailbox.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4W3W6x6J1vzDtx8 for <regext@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Jun 2024 17:35:53 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=denic.de; s=MBO0001; t=1718724953; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=RHTDIC0+AcPHjclf4Gjb2R9/O+DBxhlQfA4aXBQCMOY=; b=aerwTLobxkpOG9VhA579JWWU6y+OGeRzcRDj2qqfahDzftwLasy4XdCcVEXqN/gJDnDDFt 05gYNswdghxn1abo0FzP5zXbi1k5F57tjyNpWaeQWykR6vHVeRDGBR9KaRBOYQR/vhyKl5 6gOBkQyYL2gGWxQzCzzCdTmZnxAsiiaLr5+WRLm3oYMNhSnz5k6VdQjaHnnJXcq8Ukwnn3 M92bKmV6BmMOGsZErPs/cGWSen0v2pFYOjKVoVj2T2qlOgsA0V2Oth8hLgc7uyrLyrDErd SFGx1k1C6Lg6fb+Jc1yLFgmAV+y2fP95dqC2S3OKlE7eLsUhTy3YTk0/Y0RdHQ==
Message-ID: <a3b3ef1e-0fb5-44d5-bae0-1209acabfc02@denic.de>
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2024 17:35:47 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: kowalik@denic.de
To: regext@ietf.org
References: <591E988C-2F3E-45CA-9E43-874C50CD0F5B@elistx.com>
Content-Language: en-GB, de-DE
In-Reply-To: <591E988C-2F3E-45CA-9E43-874C50CD0F5B@elistx.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha-512"; boundary="------------ms070703020107070205060308"
X-MBO-RS-ID: 536465c389c85dbcdd8
X-MBO-RS-META: g83qe6xdugxqt9zanecuyfq5um431nb3
Message-ID-Hash: 7RWHBFFQUPKTLIRMV7TM2PJC3LAPZN6Y
X-Message-ID-Hash: 7RWHBFFQUPKTLIRMV7TM2PJC3LAPZN6Y
X-MailFrom: kowalik@denic.de
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-regext.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [regext] Re: WGLC: draft-ietf-regext-epp-delete-bcp-03
List-Id: Registration Protocols Extensions <regext.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/regext/84OifRULoUCBZFp5MgM0yDqgk60>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/regext>
List-Help: <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:regext-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:regext@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:regext-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:regext-leave@ietf.org>

Hi,

In the course of the actual discussion on the clarity of documents we 
produce, especially related to implementation maturity of the solutions 
I would need to repeat the remark I brought up during the call for 
adoption [1].

I think the document, being a BCP, should be very specific about which 
methods have already been field proven and which are kind of 
experimental with unknown implementation or operational impact.

[1] 
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/regext/lDkYhEak6_JehglG-YuqxBpwgrw/

Kind Regards,

Pawel

On 03.06.24 16:56, James Galvin wrote:
> The document editors have indicated that the following document is ready for submission to the IESG to be considered for publication as a Best Current Practice:
>
> Best Practices for Deletion of Domain and Host Objects in the Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP)
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-epp-delete-bcp/03/
>
> Please indicate your support or no objection for the publication of this document by replying to this message on list (a simple “+1” is sufficient).
>
> If any working group member has questions regarding the publication of this document please respond on the list with your concerns by close of business everywhere, Monday, 17 June 2024.
>
> If there are no objections the document will be submitted to the IESG.
>
> The Document Shepherd for this document is Andy Newton.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Antoin and Jim
> REGEXT WG Co-Chairs
>
> _______________________________________________
> regext mailing list -- regext@ietf.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to regext-leave@ietf.org

v2.39.1 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status