Re: [regext] Francesca Palombini's Discuss on draft-ietf-regext-epp-registry-maintenance-17: (with DISCUSS)

["Murray S. Kucherawy" <[e-mail]>]

On Wed, Oct 6, 2021 at 11:21 AM Francesca Palombini via Datatracker <
[e-mail]> wrote:

> Francesca Palombini has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-regext-epp-registry-maintenance-17: Discuss
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
>
>
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/blog/handling-iesg-ballot-positions/
> for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>
>
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-epp-registry-maintenance/
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> DISCUSS:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Thank you for the work on this document.
>
> Many thanks to Harald Alvestrand for the ART ART review:
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/review-ietf-regext-epp-registry-maintenance-17-artart-lc-alvestrand-2021-09-13/
> .
> I agree with his comments, and thank you to the authors for working with
> him to
> fix those points.
>
> I will hold a DISCUSS until the update answering the two first comments
> about
> "weak definitions", the "formatting issues" comment, and the date-format
> comment is published.
> [...]
>

There is a revision already pending that addresses the ARTART review
comments.  I've asked the authors to post it as soon as they get the signal
that we've processed it during the telechat, and that should be enough to
resolve this.

-MSK