Re: [regext] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-regext-rdap-sorting-and-paging-15

Mario Loffredo <mario.loffredo@iit.cnr.it> Mon, 17 August 2020 12:26 UTC

Return-Path: <mario.loffredo@iit.cnr.it>
X-Original-To: regext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: regext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFDBC3A0B87; Mon, 17 Aug 2020 05:26:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.848
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.848 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.949, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zXp_mMOoCSZE; Mon, 17 Aug 2020 05:26:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.iit.cnr.it (mx4.iit.cnr.it [146.48.98.151]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C2CD93A150C; Mon, 17 Aug 2020 05:26:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.iit.cnr.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61268B803E1; Mon, 17 Aug 2020 14:26:02 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mx4.iit.cnr.it
Received: from smtp.iit.cnr.it ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mx4.iit.cnr.it [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id h0qaLdWztJjO; Mon, 17 Aug 2020 14:25:59 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [192.12.193.108] (pc-loffredo.nic.it [192.12.193.108]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.iit.cnr.it (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A2A70B80278; Mon, 17 Aug 2020 14:25:59 +0200 (CEST)
To: Vijay Gurbani <vijay.gurbani@gmail.com>, gen-art@ietf.org
Cc: last-call@ietf.org, regext@ietf.org, draft-ietf-regext-rdap-sorting-and-paging.all@ietf.org
References: <159753241794.3282.10287963728007886569@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Mario Loffredo <mario.loffredo@iit.cnr.it>
Message-ID: <d07ed430-219a-0435-789b-03378c41fc91@iit.cnr.it>
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2020 14:22:57 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.11.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <159753241794.3282.10287963728007886569@ietfa.amsl.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: it
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/regext/9icTu18xqkAez-txpRh6kkL3r1w>
Subject: Re: [regext] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-regext-rdap-sorting-and-paging-15
X-BeenThere: regext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Registration Protocols Extensions <regext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/regext>, <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/regext/>
List-Post: <mailto:regext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext>, <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2020 12:26:08 -0000

Hi Vijay,

thanks a lot for your review. I provide my responses to your feedback below.

Il 16/08/2020 01:00, Vijay Gurbani via Datatracker ha scritto:
> Reviewer: Vijay Gurbani
> Review result: Ready with Nits
>
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
> by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
> like any other last call comments.
>
> For more information, please see the FAQ at
>
> <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
>
> Document: draft-ietf-regext-rdap-sorting-and-paging-??
> Reviewer: Vijay K. Gurbani
> Review Date: 2020-08-15
> IETF LC End Date: 2020-08-13
> IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat
>
> Summary: The draft is ready for publication as a proposed standard, with a
> couple of nits.
>
> Major issues: 0
>
> Minor issues: 0
>
> Nits/editorial comments: 2
>
> - Section 6: I understand that RFC7942 requests the authors to add a note to
> the RFC Editor to remove this section, but I also understand that this is a
> request to the author, and not a mandate (no normative language).   As an
> implementer, I always find it easy to start with some bootstrapping  code, so I
> find such implementation notes helpful.  You may wish to consider including
> this information in an Appendix.

[ML] According to what is stated in RFC7942, the "Implementation Status" 
section "... is inappropriate for inclusion in a published RFC."

Despite this, I would agree with you if that section included a client 
implementation because clients are more likely than servers to be 
publicly available as open source applications.

Definitively, I believe that the examples included in the document are 
sufficient to explain the specification.

Hope you are okay with that.

>
> - Section 1, towards end of Page 3: s/that could be/that is often/ (Reason:
> "could be" implies that truncation could happen, but is may not, "is often"
> implies the same thing, but that phrase seems somehow more deterministic than
> "could be".  This is a suggestion, please use your editorial discretion as
> appropriate.)

[ML] Sounds much better. I correct the phrase.


Best,

Mario

>
>
> _______________________________________________
> regext mailing list
> regext@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext

-- 
Dr. Mario Loffredo
Systems and Technological Development Unit
Institute of Informatics and Telematics (IIT)
National Research Council (CNR)
via G. Moruzzi 1, I-56124 PISA, Italy
Phone: +39.0503153497
Mobile: +39.3462122240
Web: http://www.iit.cnr.it/mario.loffredo