Re: [regext] FW: I-D Action: draft-hollenbeck-regext-rfc7482bis-00.txt

"Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com> Mon, 27 April 2020 16:36 UTC

Return-Path: <shollenbeck@verisign.com>
X-Original-To: regext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: regext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA8DF3A0EF6 for <regext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 09:36:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=verisign.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dTUI0dc1vDzj for <regext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 09:36:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail4.verisign.com (mail4.verisign.com [69.58.187.30]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D3ED13A0EEF for <regext@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 09:36:28 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=verisign.com; l=2218; q=dns/txt; s=VRSN; t=1588005390; h=from:to:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject; bh=3zWynvMG/BDz/oMt4E0gvkDUdGaYuFS0czzUKJdmWzc=; b=TxQcn7U7d5sgZsjFNDZvp8WovjENFi+BlmYD1lyBojUL4rh3tbh6+097 sqFXJF4Zl5EH5j0cmxEskw4Cw2/kDEa/bTRc3VykbYVHjXHwFFVH2iwRg ZWp/PRM5sbjt86LKcCcmQqJPTnsLUsm6klSSiDvJ0SsNj86bILINQdfoN ntVB4+8O+O5PtKYAMUlPJlA49eoLbcFzrdCWuF7nBFcgUeayVkAXLinGT YU9c5sjTTs0VQpPXzCTn/CQyTMd6Q1wCW3JFm1aKNmhOp+hJq7vlQFGEe ygDCJeJxl4lz9mDrnpwMh9nlkKcbcR1hMvT/HwzlOF/JOqjZWoAaFf0I7 A==;
IronPort-SDR: BAlEYDLl5CR/vsgzTakLfTbf02UbkpPQq602rFM4ykI1q2wRFlqz5fuUNR2runEUSV5jTb/CcY xX/OOLNktVIeQvdG1bVt7aAkC+Eakd5MwjXa7+CDSxpn2hphFn2B3IvrKJGRpL+Jeyz9xYUbIX xlQNHZOsxMMostkCvIinjV/jNJvKICWNJ96k7qKoNBv++ifbidM3pnxFzEmvdZzRox3o0XuN4E Q35sxY7mH3NuRsGFHaCC4+fzyuYwmqjFv0XtHu3zRZq19Df1K4VDheT//9S2wOyXsZQ15g9BVe klw=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.73,324,1583211600"; d="scan'208";a="1268395"
IronPort-PHdr: =?us-ascii?q?9a23=3AfuzLNBIkh4B1UEPugNmcpTZWNBhigK39O0sv0r?= =?us-ascii?q?FitYgeI/TxwZ3uMQTl6Ol3ixeRBMOHsq8C1rud4vGocFdDyK7JiGoFfp1IWk?= =?us-ascii?q?1NouQttCtkPvS4D1bmJuXhdS0wEZcKflZk+3amLRodQ56mNBXdrXKo8DEdBA?= =?us-ascii?q?j0OxZrKeTpAI7SiNm82/yv95HJbAhEmTqwbalyIRiyogncss0bipZ+J6gszR?= =?us-ascii?q?fEvmFGcPlMy2NyIlKTkRf85sOu85Nm7i9dpfEv+dNeXKvjZ6g3QqBWAzogM2?= =?us-ascii?q?Au+c3krgLDQheV5nsdSWoZjBxFCBXY4R7gX5fxtiz6tvdh2CSfIMb7Q6w4VS?= =?us-ascii?q?ik4qx2ThLjlSUJOCMj8GzPisJ+kr9VoA6vqRJ8zY7bYoCVO+ZxcKzSZt4aWX?= =?us-ascii?q?NBXsRNWyBdHo+wcY0CBPcBM+ZCqIn9okMDoRW8CwmrAOPvziFHhnnt0qIkz+?= =?us-ascii?q?shEhnK1xE9Ed0St3TUsMn1OKkPWu2y16nIzTLDb/dS2Tjj7ojHaQ4uru2PXb?= =?us-ascii?q?9rb8re11MvFwLejlWRpozlOSmZ2fgKs2ie9udtU/+khW0/qwxpvzSj2t0ghp?= =?us-ascii?q?TLi48b0FzI6CV0zYgvKdC3TEN3ecOoHIdKuy2HNYZ6XtkuT3xntSs50LEKpJ?= =?us-ascii?q?22cS4Xw5o93RHfceaIc42Q7xLmU+aePCl3iWp+eLK6mxay6U+gyvDgVsWs0F?= =?us-ascii?q?ZFsC5Fkt7Uu30QyxLd8tWLRftl8Emu2DmDyx7f5vtaIU8okqrbMYYhzqQqmZ?= =?us-ascii?q?UOq0jDADX2mF7wjKOMakok/e2o5/zmYrXguJCcK5d5hhziPqg0h8CyA+o1Ph?= =?us-ascii?q?ITU2Wb9+mwzrLu8EnhTLVPlPI2k63ZsJ7AJcQco660GxRV0oYk6xa7Czepzt?= =?us-ascii?q?IYkmIZI11ZexKKlJbpNE/UIPD5Fve/gluskDFxy//aOb3hB43BLmLfn7f5Yb?= =?us-ascii?q?Z990lcxRIrzdBa/J9bF7YBIO7pVU/3qdPXEhg5PxaozObgDdV3zpkeVn6XAq?= =?us-ascii?q?+FLKPStkeF5vgxLOmDeoAUtyr9JuMk5/HwkX85l0URfa6z3ZsYOziEGaEsO0?= =?us-ascii?q?CxbX3wi9ENGmBMtQ07BqS+kFiqXTlPbnC+VKV67TY+XsbuR53OSY29nJSA0T?= =?us-ascii?q?u1WJpMaSoOXkqBHnr4a62FVusCLiWILZkyvCYDUO3ra4gl0RyovgLxyP4vFe?= =?us-ascii?q?HT5jFS/cb41N9x4+DVnxw59hRqAt6cyGCCSSd/mWZeFGx+57x2vUEokgTL6q?= =?us-ascii?q?N/mfENTdE=3D?=
X-IPAS-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A2HMAgA/Cade/zGZrQpmHAEBAQEBBwEBEQEEBAEBPIFHh?= =?us-ascii?q?EcKlTCZcYFnCwEBAQEBAQEBAQcBLwQBAYREAoJNOBMCAwEBCwEBAQUBAQEBA?= =?us-ascii?q?QUDAQEBAoZLgjsig2kBAQEBAzpLBAIBCBEEAQEBHhAyHQgCBAESCLhgdIE0h?= =?us-ascii?q?U+FFoE4jFeBQj6BEYMQPoQZARIBhhIEjmKjQAMHgkWXeCWCW4lvkDGPeoFWm?= =?us-ascii?q?zACBAIEBQIVgWmBCXBwUIJpUBgNkWyOEHQ1AgYIAQEDCY4MgRABAQ?=
Received: from BRN1WNEX02.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com (10.173.153.49) by BRN1WNEX02.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com (10.173.153.49) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1913.5; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 12:36:26 -0400
Received: from BRN1WNEX02.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com ([fe80::7c0a:1cc:5def:9dde]) by BRN1WNEX02.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com ([fe80::7c0a:1cc:5def:9dde%4]) with mapi id 15.01.1913.005; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 12:36:26 -0400
From: "Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>
To: "pm@dotandco.com" <pm@dotandco.com>, "regext@ietf.org" <regext@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [EXTERNAL] Re: [regext] FW: I-D Action: draft-hollenbeck-regext-rfc7482bis-00.txt
Thread-Index: AQHWHGsGGHjfbpmwCki/isMdX/o2qaiM1GjQgACMGgD//8oU0A==
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2020 16:36:26 +0000
Message-ID: <eac5466575544290b3e05fb7684b24c4@verisign.com>
References: <157978263830.22814.10753224081346165172@ietfa.amsl.com> <1a23b173513a40568e5fa6da66df9686@verisign.com> <a51395d3-137f-40b9-bab0-a6f636188a10@www.fastmail.com> <88c2c3d3cf764a27b35e70960805749f@verisign.com> <1187b76a-485e-4276-a17f-d9febda152f9@www.fastmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <1187b76a-485e-4276-a17f-d9febda152f9@www.fastmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.170.148.18]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/regext/DySuT7VV_EGVuCcO8kpQV9EChko>
Subject: Re: [regext] FW: I-D Action: draft-hollenbeck-regext-rfc7482bis-00.txt
X-BeenThere: regext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Registration Protocols Extensions <regext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/regext>, <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/regext/>
List-Post: <mailto:regext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext>, <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2020 16:36:31 -0000

> -----Original Message-----
> From: regext <regext-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Patrick Mevzek
> Sent: Monday, April 27, 2020 11:47 AM
> To: regext@ietf.org
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [regext] FW: I-D Action: draft-hollenbeck-regext-
> rfc7482bis-00.txt
>
> On Mon, Apr 27, 2020, at 06:27, Hollenbeck, Scott wrote:
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: regext <regext-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Patrick Mevzek
> > > Sent: Monday, April 27, 2020 4:06 AM
> > > To: regext@ietf.org
> > > Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [regext] FW: I-D Action:
> > > draft-hollenbeck-regext- rfc7482bis-00.txt
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jan 23, 2020, at 07:35, Hollenbeck, Scott wrote:
> > > > FYI, folks. I just submitted the first version of 7482bis. I've
> > > > addressed the known errata, but I also have some clarification
> > > > suggestions queued up for discussion. I'll start a thread for each
> > > > of those shortly.
> > >
> > >
> > > See my previous email on RFC7483bis the same caveat (on the breadth
> > > of changes called for) applies here.
> >
> > The goal of the update is to only address necessary editorial
> > corrections and clarifications. No protocol changes. Some of what you
> > describe below has already come up in on-list discussion, so it will
> > be addressed. Anything that changes the protocol itself will be out of
> > scope for now. I'll take a look at everything below as I work on the
> > next version of the document.
>
> Thanks Scott for your explanation and hence sorry for my two emails.
>
> There may be a few things and nitpicks that could still be viewed as
> "corrections and clarifications" and hence be useful, but indeed some other
> points are really like protocol enhancements (based on what I see on the
> field today, trying to use RDAP servers in gTLDs right now is really a
> minefield...) and hence sadly will need to be jettisoned for now.

Let's not jettison the issues. We should capture them in a place like the WG wiki and queue them up for discussion if we ever get around to talking about RDAP 1.1 or 2.0. I'll take that on as an action as I triage the feedback I'm getting for 7482bis and 7483bis.

Scott