IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [regext] RDAP questions

Bernhard Reutner-Fischer <rep.dot.nop@gmail.com> Wed, 22 March 2017 12:58 UTC

Return-Path: <rep.dot.nop@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: regext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: regext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D6B31297E9 for <regext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 05:58:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ckEDcTYiAAiK for <regext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 05:58:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vk0-x22e.google.com (mail-vk0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c05::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DFE9B1297C5 for <regext@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 05:58:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vk0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id j64so109418704vkg.3 for <regext@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 05:58:22 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=HiWOHi1NnVh2HuJieM8TNyNbeSsROL+eXZsJAgQnLwg=; b=fmYWi2lwK+XTKhxvrjmnB4Aynik8i+K7tXyW4AfZgg/mzMQlGMHEjUWszIidYxRgV8 mwiukR7vHuu+e3zZe0pFSQ1HxMSAs4pAY6BRKA3TYw3G3txkNmjX+760rzWsck4oXnQn Fs2z58bKOUF2AlxW0iihy5IoY8L4EjvrRxDmJAAilX/FR+VF+gYvoAqgAz69nu8lzUvw /bw8vWZHoQHnH0NDJbzD1cZlCYSgax7ae5aytpE9NujiZqOCRGoF8bt9nEQh/WT0Mjke TPWfVvdnKGJ2jdV+dOKeLyl3uFMEgN5EHdH9CpuTv5/U4PHFs2pH1gcTv9YiQmOgEEtc 8UYg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=HiWOHi1NnVh2HuJieM8TNyNbeSsROL+eXZsJAgQnLwg=; b=KwsJxC9xmNdU0g+1Uj9KQMeo9DQqHlWWD+MU899OPVnbH/iZahpGJWlErs7Im56tUu FybZ7hhKUHCmnXzuJ4d89/4OBDLdzYO3f5OlHhTu2J1hjpSWOOwxjmvjfdnj58lpxjK/ RFNjGHGidomDIobbsreNO8XYe+tzd0h7kwPUtFGrygJJ1d/0W1PpVoM1CaMgdAkcXzW3 yd1/yEgaPApEPJGDlRvq1S1a3vTqmNJaGI2+Fd++7O65S+9mFI1ADcZzAc+qGsd80szs YtiiDyfUxQHyqmYV5Ch8Td7VfE9XnA0PhvcRFQUeFVY8Tgl2oyEULAAXmgNK9poQPT7H TvFQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H3vQ6pObOR8Z4iH1Z8NvhHf3X2O+fRQT1cbDV5pdMAf0NDIOKs8VA5yCwLXtSwa7zTbQnG3c2Ip/yh99Q==
X-Received: by 10.159.33.240 with SMTP id 103mr16932545uac.150.1490187489721; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 05:58:09 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.159.48.133 with HTTP; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 05:58:09 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAC1BbcRevbXPZY166tHLRB_eoSgir7u8W+usdmDZywFZprHbYA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CALRmJyiz3yx=Gxa9LeWNUJU5CJczvc6ojjyVwUPL4mcbD5wKiw@mail.gmail.com> <64CC805B-AD64-4127-8645-C576104AFA8B@arin.net> <D3CF5FFE.1174C5%gustavo.lozano@icann.org> <CALRmJyi2LuoJOFAN95dZQs1H4KEKzM6pEDz=rEBZ4QmqqfHVWw@mail.gmail.com> <CAC1BbcRevbXPZY166tHLRB_eoSgir7u8W+usdmDZywFZprHbYA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Bernhard Reutner-Fischer <rep.dot.nop@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2017 13:58:09 +0100
Message-ID: <CAC1BbcTx8owTCvRvJ26MDcMNgfEX76japV1MAnBvGNxBDMGbdQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Bernhard Reutner-Fischer <rep.dot.nop@gmail.com>
Cc: Gustavo Lozano <gustavo.lozano@icann.org>, Andy Newton <andy@arin.net>, "regext@ietf.org" <regext@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/regext/EEEMoNWLQAKJQbYk7qWfqGfvCz4>
Subject: Re: [regext] RDAP questions
X-BeenThere: regext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Registration Protocols Extensions <regext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/regext>, <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/regext/>
List-Post: <mailto:regext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext>, <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2017 12:58:29 -0000

Hi!

3) missing normative reference to IANA, "RDAP JSON Values" ?

https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7483#section-10.2.2
mentions
---8<---
... have been registered in the "RDAP JSON Values"
   registry:
---8<---

But there is no reference (rendered?) to rdap-json-values in
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7483#section-14.1

where i would have expected to find something like:
   [rdap-json-values]
              IANA, "RDAP JSON Values",
              <https://www.iana.org/assignments/rdap-json-values/>.

I do not know where the source for the rfc is so cannot say if this is
an omission or a rendering-bug.

https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7480#section-8.1
might have the same problem

At first glance this omission makes it unclear if a compliant server
should emit an extension entry in the 'rdapConformance' array when
using values defined in rfc8056

thanks,

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email