Re: [regext] Privacy and HR considerations for draft-ietf-regext-verificationcode

Andrew Newton <andy@hxr.us> Wed, 19 December 2018 15:20 UTC

Return-Path: <andy@hxr.us>
X-Original-To: regext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: regext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F22212E036 for <regext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Dec 2018 07:20:32 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=hxr-us.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CI9443rPxae6 for <regext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Dec 2018 07:20:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-it1-x12e.google.com (mail-it1-x12e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::12e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CFF0D12872C for <regext@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Dec 2018 07:20:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-it1-x12e.google.com with SMTP id h193so9833215ita.5 for <regext@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Dec 2018 07:20:29 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hxr-us.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=57V+8YN0Fb1Ig+6YQnDte5OLbXZNBofJbd1fIN/Fyis=; b=a6FhBLBCMiAFizblOkqvkjMyRf923DUfY3uZPf04RjpOVG/+0zMcOoF7usmA4AHqTQ +ULJo8lK6FWQYKn52ifuULfAPrzWiTXJVpBe0htzY+X3+YnPy4fhJui53NTz0vkZ4a/N OcwgOokXQcY/8H0GqvL2iaQT1ZgE2rxDqNuogqWSzyBlcknbDJrv/BaQDrCW4LtgCuxI 8U7YX4XYtXZphAa3C9q0t0aI0aSYWrUPMSDLK23uEVZqjlajqzD3K6OEZlUj2ZHGIiwG FpCY6j1glT/AC62ERwXA+yrfn0PMXkOqsmr3tk8E/JbvDf7W7SUOa6TUjJ+Trh3MWNFA FONA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=57V+8YN0Fb1Ig+6YQnDte5OLbXZNBofJbd1fIN/Fyis=; b=pkhtgii2qmiCt4IEj/x9iOTrq1TeiTNK6a8hDLyoq31uEzy73HsVRVcsGjqlkOKVJ2 0c3xmEnpybBGYf/3STGSVSlsCL24oKTS6P4hF220eSwknLx2S5vxCvaeBfYu8uitJ5Rz TU7YS7awTeaHqESnNLeZ/FQuWlmXhjlZP6iYUjo9bHoVXMJALTAv4NPlhGYljFrmVFuC F7A3H2F2RCP4hP3fUxTp5onlw5j23SGSvck6oUYgVJryesqB3L1vGFpZ8jAb0OVhWov9 HpsZAs8tZZ4lF6n83UmrGoWRYTBsi8Oy1w6OMrASvrp032uXEAJBVFOjIG1EzbGjC/M+ Bf9A==
X-Gm-Message-State: AA+aEWbJ88xig4yweURDDQ2faBY0sX4B9Vsq3WHYghTZb+uJN5+hQLkA Kci1uufYXlfoMFpjvGII+ske3q8M6FCa37E+G7Sw0Mvi
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AFSGD/UNVVZACgvp0nfi00y5XHwbRL+8R4x0tABdsLT2GQ7wi01r1Ya4RKfHqS0Av/zQPkr6v+FcC6Z9xiLUtjzVKjY=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:660c:283:: with SMTP id s3mr7037208itl.135.1545232828948; Wed, 19 Dec 2018 07:20:28 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <5f7d0b3e-c844-1700-c369-90bb41e8241e@cis-india.org> <CAAQiQReVnuwFBCA2vOwnwaUw8k+1TCK-5DO+KLsd=CWF3Lh8Cg@mail.gmail.com> <90404577-8405-c48f-351b-2c157a24de6d@cis-india.org>
In-Reply-To: <90404577-8405-c48f-351b-2c157a24de6d@cis-india.org>
From: Andrew Newton <andy@hxr.us>
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2018 10:19:33 -0500
Message-ID: <CAAQiQRehJ6Ak7emkPk=0rHyD7yxTab_CH=n18Z8cxLP=R-tXCg@mail.gmail.com>
To: gurshabad@cis-india.org
Cc: Registration Protocols Extensions <regext@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/regext/Fony-X-alM4tfBNkl50LK5tn7gE>
Subject: Re: [regext] Privacy and HR considerations for draft-ietf-regext-verificationcode
X-BeenThere: regext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Registration Protocols Extensions <regext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/regext>, <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/regext/>
List-Post: <mailto:regext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext>, <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2018 15:20:32 -0000

On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 5:22 AM Gurshabad Grover
<gurshabad@cis-india.org> wrote:
>
>
> Privacy Considerations
> ----------------------
> The working of the described extension depends on the sharing of data of
> (or generated by) registrants with the Verification Service Provider
> (VSP), which is a third party. The specification leaves the scope of
> information shared with and stored by the VSP up to the policies of the
> locality. There may be no mechanisms for registrants to express
> preference for what information should shared with the VSP, in which
> case, registrants' sensitive personal information directly linked to the
> identities of the individual, such as contained in the contact mapping
> object, may be exposed to the VSP without user control. This personal
> information may be further correlated with other data sources available
> to the VSP.
>
> If a client seeks to implement or offer this extension, it MUST inform
> the registrant about about the exact information to be shared with the VSP.
>

I disagree with the MUST. What the registrant is informed of or not is
entirely a policy matter and not up to the IETF. At best, this should
be a lowercase "should".

-andy