Re: [regext] rfc7484bis

Patrick Mevzek <pm@dotandco.com> Tue, 04 August 2020 16:47 UTC

Return-Path: <pm@dotandco.com>
X-Original-To: regext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: regext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A7B33A0C3B for <regext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Aug 2020 09:47:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=dotandco.com header.b=S25xYyNL; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=djgmqpTN
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dFOoF_c4tMxY for <regext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Aug 2020 09:47:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wout5-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout5-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 01D253A0C25 for <regext@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Aug 2020 09:47:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B3F086E for <regext@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Aug 2020 12:47:24 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from imap22 ([10.202.2.72]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 04 Aug 2020 12:47:24 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=dotandco.com; h= mime-version:message-id:in-reply-to:references:date:from:to :subject:content-type; s=fm3; bh=96d6N81KiAkK9yCdIqaiCf7Jk93Kzyl O9GGBj1HZCfs=; b=S25xYyNLsHjhF3wbBNpd5/1yzynBFnrC5avVw+YdQ2rnOvI cFlBtVmHNu8sbdDx7PtgIkDaGHJ4l9Mu5PGuSM9TSZchk+w1+1YYxtTpNTlcvLGM +ggGtusI4GTjxk0xpQ+ti3td1ujUeIMa+yBkYV1I+ORjQaslO4c0sfaNNLa3Nd1q uEXDhnFPSdzUhbi/cvOKJ7WMkyLmtLbUNalv8/N6MG5rLhfp5W79T5jwvR9iv5K8 e+Wnti5jPhMKk+cmOTJe0Cw34SmWGDBR8kE4uMSn3DGB5qtCxRBuGpOwteIbS/58 mdprh4Z6Vbg2MIPE7uDIW0hC6z3mdxaukxXdeJA==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=96d6N8 1KiAkK9yCdIqaiCf7Jk93KzylO9GGBj1HZCfs=; b=djgmqpTNgCiOlvmM1dq2od wXmUBFcI4BNIVGq8NaaUjWg8Kx87H2o/GmyMg0doeCM4oPfVLC2hxXhhZk1XQqc/ hOQ6hDPoqn2T16evgWk9pf8tcNaZY3sd5EO9JYJyJDFgRELRVf79zB1FSmMghBEp v7EmUcpb0MAgkFV5z9Zak25RussM+WYbq156QkM+M0/5sn0233eoUa5NohSjz8Rh SVsUsi4JRmmnsHq3M1vCOgl4MEk29hpXcQKnw10YNZaSlXcaxHv5GjD+lRp5RIjf bB5wuJpczslDy8v8GLaN3mi5R1rMXAaQSnqu14ujzvB6sT/r95iWV3TZ//i66Ibg ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:G5EpXxvhNHoXKgjenLh1UJfZay9Xc22zpQ5JkhI2ojhvzalBnYxz1wdUacU>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduiedrjeeigddutdeiucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpefofgggkfgjfhffhffvufgtsehttd ertderredtnecuhfhrohhmpedfrfgrthhrihgtkhcuofgvvhiivghkfdcuoehpmhesugho thgrnhgutghordgtohhmqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpedugfffieehffejkeduhfdvke evffdufeeuieekheeuffejfeejieetieehudfgkeenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedt necurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehpmhesughothgrnhgutghordgtohhm
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:G5EpX6c2nMHMvuTN_O8wSOr05zeKb9RAANAjoyArUTWDafhiTpJOfw> <xmx:G5EpX0yn8fO0JOQfny1C9BFmV8ZKJ8asBFpxhCBsd0JNv-kc1IhpRg> <xmx:G5EpX4PvJWE3ED_PgokHGJGlGQ4aVyhdGdRKSvCqDep6RFGdeSmGfw> <xmx:G5EpX3cvF6Jmr6yJ20Nn6Zy86cRQ4L-akIzv9L6QzISnIkIxtjeUOQ>
Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id 7D03E6680078; Tue, 4 Aug 2020 12:47:23 -0400 (EDT)
X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface
User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.3.0-136-gc39b634-fm-20200803.001-gc39b6340
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <b462d05a-4739-46c1-91e2-09c3b6533f64@www.fastmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <2F82ED17-8312-4E70-B18B-C51B2BDCFD97@viagenie.ca>
References: <2F82ED17-8312-4E70-B18B-C51B2BDCFD97@viagenie.ca>
Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2020 11:47:03 -0500
From: "Patrick Mevzek" <pm@dotandco.com>
To: regext@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/regext/GKR6SYJkhEzZ4TNWbAJEo_fU32E>
Subject: Re: [regext] rfc7484bis
X-BeenThere: regext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Registration Protocols Extensions <regext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/regext>, <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/regext/>
List-Post: <mailto:regext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext>, <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2020 16:47:26 -0000

On Tue, Aug 4, 2020, at 08:46, Marc Blanchet wrote:
>   if anyone has a something to raise for RFC7484, please send me email 
> asap.

Hello Marc,

Maybe just an update regarding TLS:
s/RFC5246/RFC8446/
but depending on what IANA webservers support or not.

Also about:
"
   Because these registries will be accessed by software, the download
   demand for the RDAP Bootstrap Services Registries may be unusually
   high compared to normal IANA registries.  The technical
   infrastructure by which registries are published will need to be
   reviewed and might need to be augmented.
"

5 years after the first RFC, maybe it would be useful/interesting to get some
statistics from IANA about this or even their feelings on that for the future.

For example, I do have witnessed some changes at some point, like downloads without
a User-Agent are prohibited now if I recall correctly.

-- 
  Patrick Mevzek
  pm@dotandco.com