Re: [regext] milestones for recently adopted documents

[Patrick Mevzek <[e-mail]>]

Hello,

On Mon, May 4, 2020, at 08:04, Roger D Carney wrote:
>  Good Morning,
> 
>  Thanks for your review and comments Patrick.
> 
>  For the questions you brought up:

If possible, please also see the points I raised earlier in:
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/regext/d79sscIkCy0RR1yv-VZb3d2_D48/

>  DDOS/SRS down - This draft is not intended to support emergency notifications.

Ok but then the draft says:

     <maint:reason>
       MUST be present and contains the reason behind the maintenance;
       values SHOULD either be 'planned' or 'emergency'.

emergency is listed as a value...

>  <maint:description> - Draft will be updated to match text to schema. 
> Simply, we limited size to restrict someone from writing a book, is 
> there an alternative size people would suggest?

I see no reason to limit it at the protocol level.
And even if you do limit it, I do not think that "MUST NOT exceed 1024 bit." is the adequate description for a string of characters.

-- 
  Patrick Mevzek
  [e-mail]