IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [regext] CALL FOR ADOPTION: Proposed Milestones for the next year

Peter Koch <pk@DENIC.DE> Fri, 17 May 2019 16:38 UTC

Return-Path: <peter@denic.de>
X-Original-To: regext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: regext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3921C1200FC for <regext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 May 2019 09:38:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.3
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.3 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=denic.de
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Xg_NyjuWLPcB for <regext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 May 2019 09:38:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx1.denic.de (mx1.denic.de [81.91.161.53]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47F0E1200F8 for <regext@ietf.org>; Fri, 17 May 2019 09:38:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at spamav-1.osl.denic.de
Received: from (mx.denic.de) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.denic.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4C47331A; Fri, 17 May 2019 18:38:12 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mx1.denic.de 4C47331A
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=denic.de; s=mail; t=1558111092; bh=2vrTH6Vrj6/HvLH9TANT/qpnJPeaAoch8O9c1OH75O0=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:Sender:From:Sender:To:CC:Subject: Message-Id:Date; b=M4buQx5NV29CdjtiJfiNPQHCF2oqHWnGPJ5vNCWJ0KX7/aOLwmiEwA8mDC+fzxAEm CeRxCeVQyXKuecUNqHT4OG9QhocJhxXMJryEJT/pIiY+5mS+i6/VGqdDQhXEjvl/KS /WgeJjU3tp8+fjwWGDvblGNB18v5OjCLruMiY77b9oupKOVwVwmjkW33yqxciNqmb0 Z/RpAWC0SuCqUjQ7AT6JkomfOODKpidAOAv02MR1NNCTAZTUoSb26f+ARIiclwSkKe hjdrLKVu0eSZjKGXKobpty5lBU22ujJ+mfnzWfzd6gYhLunaG2LxnD8rqg7dxpbkef +L9VKBqOPshig==
Date: Fri, 17 May 2019 18:38:12 +0200
From: Peter Koch <pk@DENIC.DE>
To: Registration Protocols Extensions <regext@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <20190517163812.GE41702@x11672.adm.denic.de>
Mail-Followup-To: Registration Protocols Extensions <regext@ietf.org>
References: <B0493623-D8BD-4A58-A554-07794EB2F816@elistx.com> <C3EB6BF6-6611-4A1E-8A20-B143023E08A1@elistx.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <C3EB6BF6-6611-4A1E-8A20-B143023E08A1@elistx.com>
Sender: Peter Koch <peter@denic.de>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/regext/Ieje913vvIGEGN-RWyW4yz4xvA8>
Subject: Re: [regext] CALL FOR ADOPTION: Proposed Milestones for the next year
X-BeenThere: regext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Registration Protocols Extensions <regext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/regext>, <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/regext/>
List-Post: <mailto:regext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext>, <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 May 2019 16:38:20 -0000

On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 11:58:59AM -0400, James Galvin wrote:

> The results were:
> Support: 4
> Object: 0
> 
> The chairs consider these milestones adopted by the REGEXT WG.

could the chairs please clarify my point raised 29 April:

# maybe I missed it, but is an item designated as a milestone to be read as the
# point in time the respective draft is supposed to be sent to the IESG for
# approval and do you suggest that all drafts ought to go on standards track?

Without putting words in anyone's mouth: "we'll decide that later"
would be an acceptable, albeit not ideal, response.

Thanks,
  Peter

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email