[regext] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-regext-org-ext-09: (with COMMENT)

Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com> Tue, 23 October 2018 22:00 UTC

Return-Path: <ben@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: regext@ietf.org
Delivered-To: regext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43609128CE4; Tue, 23 Oct 2018 15:00:40 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
To: "The IESG" <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-regext-org-ext@ietf.org, Pieter Vandepitte <pieter.vandepitte@dnsbelgium.be>, regext-chairs@ietf.org, pieter.vandepitte@dnsbelgium.be, regext@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.87.1
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <154033204026.31220.17905261883074891533.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2018 15:00:40 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/regext/JRjFwNEvsJvVrfxfstuqA4yIyxo>
Subject: [regext] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-regext-org-ext-09: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: regext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Registration Protocols Extensions <regext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/regext>, <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/regext/>
List-Post: <mailto:regext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext>, <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2018 22:00:40 -0000

Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-regext-org-ext-09: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)

Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.

The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:


Thanks for the work on this. I have a few comments:

*** Substantive Comments ***

§1: "An organization mapping object defined in [ID.draft-ietf-regext-org]
SHOULD be created first."

First before what?

*** Editorial Comments ***

- General:
I'm a little confused by the split in material between draft-ietf-regext-org
and draft-ietf-regext-org-ext, especially how the command mapping and related
info seems to span both documents. It seems a bit reader-unfriendly. But it's
late enough in the process that it's probably not worth changing.

- Abstract: Please expand EPP on first mention both in the abstract and in the

§2, 3rd paragraph:  I know we are not consistent about this, but I find the
word “conforming” to be a red flag. Standards track RFCs should be about
interoperability, not conformance. I suggest striking all after “presented”.