[regext] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-regext-data-escrow-07: (with COMMENT)
Éric Vyncke via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Wed, 08 April 2020 09:29 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: regext@ietf.org
Delivered-To: regext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 803593A0F4A; Wed, 8 Apr 2020 02:29:58 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Éric Vyncke via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-regext-data-escrow@ietf.org, regext-chairs@ietf.org, regext@ietf.org, James Gould <jgould@verisign.com>, jgould@verisign.com, cjbc@it.uc3m.es, int-dir@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.124.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Éric Vyncke <evyncke@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <158633819848.32694.18059299837744880060@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2020 02:29:58 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/regext/K3ukhRgxmQHhsllWVwgoEb2M44o>
Subject: [regext] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-regext-data-escrow-07: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: regext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Registration Protocols Extensions <regext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/regext>, <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/regext/>
List-Post: <mailto:regext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext>, <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2020 09:29:59 -0000
Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-regext-data-escrow-07: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-data-escrow/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Thank you for the work put into this document. I have appreciated the examples of section 13. I am also support the "data at rest encryption" as noted by Roman's DISCUSS as by Carlos in his INTDIR review. Please address the issues found by Carlos during the INTDIR review: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-dir/8BJEPavSHK0BYTe_f1W1BFG-fwA Finally, for my own curiosity, is there a reason why using the word "watermark" rather than "timestamp" ? Regards, -éric
- [regext] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf… Éric Vyncke via Datatracker