IETF Logo Mail Archive

[regext] Scheduling for IETF 108

Antoin Verschuren <ietf@antoin.nl> Fri, 05 June 2020 13:31 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf@antoin.nl>
X-Original-To: regext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: regext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFE143A080E for <regext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Jun 2020 06:31:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=antoin.nl
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0aUYochnl4IN for <regext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Jun 2020 06:31:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from walhalla.antoin.nl (walhalla.antoin.nl [62.251.108.8]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EE4003A00D3 for <regext@ietf.org>; Fri, 5 Jun 2020 06:31:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by walhalla.antoin.nl (Postfix, from userid 5001) id 5C7372805FA; Fri, 5 Jun 2020 15:31:02 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=antoin.nl; s=walhalla; t=1591363862; bh=idQCbb3CkWWYIdSt4HdvfB0C6StmoM2YIkh9pYxOtnc=; h=From:Subject:Date:To:From; b=gQR4u7vxleXiBo5QqDYCz7FW7GLsj9atPLF4pSNsW3EWQdKe7uXarvyIYkcbTh/3Y MelZU0iaOyCx/t+cxPRtFrFCcabn80SUOR+9MaWIq6c0TyWk1hUkm71zu3uNoWXS5I cuvshkhvGav+l6zojnPWLsncGCXnawgXbTCPdfwI=
Received: from [IPv6:2001:985:b3c0:1:406c:ce87:b110:278d] (unknown [IPv6:2001:985:b3c0:1:406c:ce87:b110:278d]) by walhalla.antoin.nl (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8B382280470 for <regext@ietf.org>; Fri, 5 Jun 2020 15:31:00 +0200 (CEST)
From: Antoin Verschuren <ietf@antoin.nl>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.80.23.2.2\))
Message-Id: <4629A7E4-448A-44A3-BABC-26A6D212D61F@antoin.nl>
Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2020 15:31:00 +0200
To: regext <regext@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.80.23.2.2)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/regext/KBSnVYe0eoAYYxNigyh-jR2rUxM>
Subject: [regext] Scheduling for IETF 108
X-BeenThere: regext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Registration Protocols Extensions <regext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/regext>, <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/regext/>
List-Post: <mailto:regext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext>, <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2020 13:31:07 -0000

Hi all,

It is time again to start thinking about scheduling a meeting for IETF 108.
As you are aware, IETF 108 will be an all virtual meeting this time.
We are reaching out to you to ask your opinion on scheduling a meeting.
What conflicts with other working groups or BOF’s should be avoided?

This is also a first call for agenda items.
We would like to know if any of the authors intend to discuss major topics regarding their documents.
Are there any other topics to discuss?
If so, please send us your thoughts on giving a remote presentation.

As a reminder to people, this will be the first time that there will be a meeting fee for all remote participation.
Any opinions for participants in our group for which that would be an obstacle for participating would be welcomed too.

Regards,

Your co-chairs Jim and Antoin.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email