Re: [regext] WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-regext-rfc7483bis
James Galvin <galvin@elistx.com> Fri, 02 October 2020 20:06 UTC
Return-Path: <galvin@elistx.com>
X-Original-To: regext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: regext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C86EF3A16D1 for <regext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Oct 2020 13:06:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=elistx-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dkAtuPf082FZ for <regext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Oct 2020 13:06:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qv1-xf2f.google.com (mail-qv1-xf2f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::f2f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 618183A16CF for <regext@ietf.org>; Fri, 2 Oct 2020 13:06:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qv1-xf2f.google.com with SMTP id b13so1706417qvl.2 for <regext@ietf.org>; Fri, 02 Oct 2020 13:06:16 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=elistx-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=wUO8M+HOV9plw7GWIq8Q4bBwLllvRtQ2sOV2ol5qavw=; b=do9CfGGzHTNHyn8jESQ/DDcFtjiKPahOLweF55fHm+jB3KAhp/x9ySiVEqUgnDx11E xgNRHDvN+NcA028jK0lN0ou5kXXKl2nWym/FjPMwSIjhi7/+xHCczDHo/2k6kZKdhNni vDYw92FGmY7lY3M929EJIisPQQbATG9u8glilXGsBh8VUbrpGzDbmzC1Qmck1Xs0jPb5 O2XwkONt6j+10uCTL5P3jZZ5x6GH4ltLFXF4Zh6OqYWiEbN1KKoM15QDNIjdxbp+gY42 9WXeUHAsfPw691tx5Ri2b68Vcqz4lhOE4FmMvIjXyyFrMHZtkZjaerO2UfjRgIo8ww/x +JMA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=wUO8M+HOV9plw7GWIq8Q4bBwLllvRtQ2sOV2ol5qavw=; b=LIwohVgrCxn++5GwRxpGH/BHezI7Ti4l8Tfv9T3uP/DaIy3SFodNyaw48jzZUNgSmF Nt1Liohmi9lHnwJU0kGQGjFXqAj4O3b180rg5W2Vp3XuTSdqMqqwZEEa8k85iCR1IRMr YVnGmX+qzi4hrTyh2Kqc+jwgqhQaze/rbOUwz7scEzUex9MTWY/eA4u1vMIR0TH5PYy7 z7YuACicxeIh/n0NvYqUQs7wS0KuyPyY+qKXddgddQ92cIo6nL41c2QBkbUKu0lpFwM1 MoJJUezRczZX1DCGjlnn8aXvvVb2zoks/VEXyB55boDU2YVcKQslWvuQywUe/6NToa0X m+rQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5331YOyhIxDS/b7lQ4+VAAmHEt/HosDhVpd0FS0BiIKQeBtUkt/6 Ee+mACYhVjdGBd2EN+rr2Zn4NCtmc/vx3mXqrZo=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyjXJ89bYxPKtElyPHxsfVv2TN0nh5sJuaYg078jBRXu0LYI107C4Io3bkdWJbkZVwYPpKFAg==
X-Received: by 2002:ad4:408f:: with SMTP id l15mr3797682qvp.4.1601669174975; Fri, 02 Oct 2020 13:06:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.0.100] ([2601:154:c202:9d20:591:5600:a9ec:a8fa]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id l13sm1924673qtv.82.2020.10.02.13.06.13 for <regext@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 02 Oct 2020 13:06:13 -0700 (PDT)
From: James Galvin <galvin@elistx.com>
To: regext@ietf.org
Date: Fri, 02 Oct 2020 16:06:27 -0400
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.13.2r5673)
Message-ID: <064F7704-0619-4CD1-A17C-A59EC82A7596@elistx.com>
In-Reply-To: <F5EC2287-ADD1-49E9-B5F2-25E73C64DA10@antoin.nl>
References: <F5EC2287-ADD1-49E9-B5F2-25E73C64DA10@antoin.nl>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/regext/KESYOjNABInduX3sL1LQYhR31xs>
Subject: Re: [regext] WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-regext-rfc7483bis
X-BeenThere: regext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Registration Protocols Extensions <regext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/regext>, <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/regext/>
List-Post: <mailto:regext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext>, <mailto:regext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Oct 2020 20:06:19 -0000
The WGLC for this document was scheduled to end today. While there is support to move the document forward there are two minor comments that have been raised during the last call. The chairs would like to hear from other working group members as to what to do with these comments. Rather than close the last call and risk another last call, we are extending this last call for another week. If we can come to a consensus as to how to proceed before the end of last call than the document can stay on track to be submitted to the IESG after the last call. The WG last call will end at close of business on Friday, 9 October 2020. Here are the comments as seen on the mailing list. Please respond with your suggestions regarding these two comments. James Gould: I have one item to bring up with draft-ietf-regext-rfc7483bis, which is associated with Section 5.1 “The Entity Object Class”. The jCard "version" and "fn" members are required according to RFC 6350, which poses an issue if a contact name does not exist or needs to be redacted. To address this case, I recommend adding a sentence to the end of section 3 "Common Data Types": Contact information is defined using jCards as described in [RFC7095]. The “version” and “fn” members are required according to [RFC6350], where an empty “fn” member MAY be used when the contact name does not exist or is redacted. Two response have been offered: Scott Hollenbeck: I'd like to see some discussion of this suggestion. If one understands the normative references, the suggestion is already implicitly addressed. There may be some value in describing this situation explicitly since it came up in the ICANN gTLD implementation context, but so others think this clarification is necessary? Jasdip Singh: Seems if the RDAP profile for the DNRs (https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/rdap-operational-profile-2016-07-26-en) could clarify this, the spec could be left as-is. Mario Loffredo: The document does not contain any requirement or recommendation about when returning ldhName and unicodeName values. However, the examples seem to convey the idea that ldhName must always be returned and unicodeName must be returned in case of an IDN. No responses yet. Thanks! Antoin and Jim On 18 Sep 2020, at 9:52, Antoin Verschuren wrote: > The following working group document is believed to be ready for > submission to the IESG for publication as a standards track document: > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-rfc7483bis/ > > This WG last call will end at close of business, Friday, 2 October > 2020. > > Please review this document and indicate your support (a simple > “+1” is sufficient) or concerns with the publication of this > document by replying to this message on the list. > > The document shepherd for this document is Jasdip Singh. > > Regards, > > Jim and Antoin > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > regext mailing list > regext@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
- [regext] WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-regext-rfc7483b… Antoin Verschuren
- Re: [regext] WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-regext-rfc7… Tom Harrison
- Re: [regext] WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-regext-rfc7… Mario Loffredo
- Re: [regext] WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-regext-rfc7… Roger D Carney
- Re: [regext] WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-regext-rfc7… Gould, James
- Re: [regext] WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-regext-rfc7… Hollenbeck, Scott
- Re: [regext] WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-regext-rfc7… Jasdip Singh
- [regext] Fwd: Re: WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-regext… Mario Loffredo
- Re: [regext] WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-regext-rfc7… James Galvin
- Re: [regext] WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-regext-rfc7… Mario Loffredo
- Re: [regext] WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-regext-rfc7… Hollenbeck, Scott
- Re: [regext] WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-regext-rfc7… Jasdip Singh
- Re: [regext] WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-regext-rfc7… Hollenbeck, Scott
- Re: [regext] WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-regext-rfc7… Antoin Verschuren